Literature DB >> 23148469

Similar response patterns do not imply identical origins: an energetic masking account of nonspeech effects in compensation for coarticulation.

Navin Viswanathan1, James S Magnuson, Carol A Fowler.   

Abstract

Nonspeech materials are widely used to identify basic mechanisms underlying speech perception. For instance, they have been used to examine the origin of compensation for coarticulation, the observation that listeners' categorization of phonetic segments depends on neighboring segments (Mann, 1980). Specifically, nonspeech precursors matched to critical formant frequencies of speech precursors have been shown to produce similar categorization shifts as speech contexts. This observation has been interpreted to mean that spectrally contrastive frequency relations between neighboring segments underlie the categorization shifts observed after speech, as well as nonspeech precursors (Lotto & Kluender, 1998). From the gestural perspective, however, categorization shifts in speech contexts occur because of listeners' sensitivity to acoustic information for coarticulatory gestural overlap in production; in nonspeech contexts, this occurs because of energetic masking of acoustic information for gestures. In 2 experiments, we distinguish the energetic masking and spectral contrast accounts. In Experiment 1, we investigated the effects of varying precursor tone frequency on speech categorization. Consistent only with the masking account, tonal effects were greater for frequencies close enough to those in the target syllables for masking to occur. In Experiment 2, we filtered the target stimuli to simulate effects of masking and obtained behavioral outcomes that closely resemble those with nonspeech tones. We conclude that masking provides the more plausible account of nonspeech context effects. More generally, we suggest that similar results from the use of speech and nonspeech materials do not automatically imply identical origins and that the use of nonspeech in speech studies entails careful examination of the nature of information in the nonspeech materials. 2013 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23148469      PMCID: PMC3855849          DOI: 10.1037/a0030735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  25 in total

1.  Contrast effects do not underlie effects of preceding liquids on stop-consonant identification by humans.

Authors:  C A Fowler; J M Brown; V A Mann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Temporally nonadjacent nonlinguistic sounds affect speech categorization.

Authors:  Lori L Holt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-04

3.  Putting phonetic context effects into context: a commentary on Fowler (2006).

Authors:  Andrew J Lotto; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-02

4.  The mean matters: effects of statistically defined nonspeech spectral distributions on speech categorization.

Authors:  Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  On the causes of compensation for coarticulation: evidence for phonological mediation.

Authors:  Holger Mitterer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-10

Review 6.  Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues.

Authors:  C A Fowler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  General contrast effects in speech perception: effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification.

Authors:  A J Lotto; K R Kluender
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-05

8.  Letter: Dichotic release from masking for speech.

Authors:  T C Rand
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Compensation for coarticulation: disentangling auditory and gestural theories of perception of coarticulatory effects in speech.

Authors:  Navin Viswanathan; James S Magnuson; Carol A Fowler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  A critical examination of the spectral contrast account of compensation for coarticulation.

Authors:  Navin Viswanathan; Carol A Fowler; James S Magnuson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02
View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparing speech and nonspeech context effects across timescales in coarticulatory contexts.

Authors:  Navin Viswanathan; Damian G Kelty-Stephen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Spectral Contrast Effects Reveal Different Acoustic Cues for Vowel Recognition in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Information for coarticulation: Static signal properties or formant dynamics?

Authors:  Navin Viswanathan; James S Magnuson; Carol A Fowler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Compensation for visually specified coarticulation in liquid-stop contexts.

Authors:  Navin Viswanathan; Joseph D W Stephens
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Speaker-normalized sound representations in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Matthias J Sjerps; Neal P Fox; Keith Johnson; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.