Literature DB >> 19145013

A critical examination of the spectral contrast account of compensation for coarticulation.

Navin Viswanathan1, Carol A Fowler, James S Magnuson.   

Abstract

Vocal tract gestures for adjacent phones overlap temporally, rendering the acoustic speech signal highly context dependent. For example, following a segment with an anterior place of articulation, a posterior segment's place of articulation is pulled frontward, and listeners' category boundaries shift appropriately. Some theories assume that listeners perceptually attune or compensate for coarticulatory context. An alternative is that shifts result from spectral contrast. Indeed, shifts occur when speech precursors are replaced by pure tones, frequency matched to the formant offset at the assumed locus of contrast (Lotto & Kluender, 1998). However, tone analogues differ from natural formants in several ways, raising the possibility that conditions for contrast may not exist in natural speech. When we matched tones to natural formant intensities and trajectories, boundary shifts diminished. When we presented only the critical spectral region of natural speech tokens, no compensation was observed. These results suggest that conditions for spectral contrast do not exist in typical speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19145013      PMCID: PMC3753042          DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  Contrast effects do not underlie effects of preceding liquids on stop-consonant identification by humans.

Authors:  C A Fowler; J M Brown; V A Mann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Neighboring spectral content influences vowel identification.

Authors:  L L Holt; A J Lotto; K R Kluender
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Preceding phonetic context affects perception of nonspeech.

Authors:  Joseph D W Stephens; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sound-producing sources as objects of perception: rate normalization and nonspeech perception.

Authors:  C A Fowler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of later-occurring nonlinguistic sounds on speech categorization.

Authors:  Travis Wade; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Compensation for coarticulation reflects gesture perception, not spectral contrast.

Authors:  Carol A Fowler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-02

7.  A critical evaluation of visually moderated phonetic context effects.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Joseph D W Stephens; Andrew J Lotto
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-08

8.  Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception.

Authors:  V A Mann; B H Repp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception.

Authors:  V A Mann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-11

10.  Compensation for coarticulation: disentangling auditory and gestural theories of perception of coarticulatory effects in speech.

Authors:  Navin Viswanathan; James S Magnuson; Carol A Fowler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  15 in total

1.  Contingent categorization in speech perception.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Natasha Bullock-Rest; Ariane E Rhone; Allard Jongman; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.331

2.  Perception of complete and incomplete formant transitions in vowels.

Authors:  Pierre Divenyi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparing speech and nonspeech context effects across timescales in coarticulatory contexts.

Authors:  Navin Viswanathan; Damian G Kelty-Stephen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Similar response patterns do not imply identical origins: an energetic masking account of nonspeech effects in compensation for coarticulation.

Authors:  Navin Viswanathan; James S Magnuson; Carol A Fowler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Allard Jongman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  Relative cue encoding in the context of sophisticated models of categorization: Separating information from categorization.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

7.  Compensation for coarticulation: disentangling auditory and gestural theories of perception of coarticulatory effects in speech.

Authors:  Navin Viswanathan; James S Magnuson; Carol A Fowler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Talking as doing: Language forms and public language.

Authors:  Carol A Fowler
Journal:  New Ideas Psychol       Date:  2014-01-01

9.  Information for coarticulation: Static signal properties or formant dynamics?

Authors:  Navin Viswanathan; James S Magnuson; Carol A Fowler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Compensation for visually specified coarticulation in liquid-stop contexts.

Authors:  Navin Viswanathan; Joseph D W Stephens
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.