Literature DB >> 23147284

Increasing bony contact and overlap with computer-designed offset cuts in free fibula mandible reconstruction.

Nicholas T Haddock1, Casian Monaco, Katherine A Weimer, David L Hirsch, Jamie P Levine, Pierre B Saadeh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The free fibula flap is the standard of care in mandibular reconstruction; however, procedural nuances continue to optimize results. More accurate and efficient osteotomies for graft insetting can be envisioned, which address the difficulty in obtaining a perfect match between the cut ends of the fibula and the mandible and the subsequent giving up of maximal bone contact. We propose a method of complementary offset osteotomies. The angled cuts were virtually planned using three-dimensional computed tomographic images. Optimal offset cuts maximized surface area contact and facilitated intraoperative repositioning in the setting of additional native bone margin requirement.
METHODS: Using previously described protocols, three-dimensional virtual reconstructions of the facial skeleton and the fibula (average, series of five) were used to simulate osteotomies at 25, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 degrees to the long axis of the fibula. Complementary osteotomies were then simulated at the mandibular body just distal to the first molar in simulated free fibula reconstructions. Total area of apposing surfaces was calculated using computer-aided design. The results from the 25-, 30-, 45-, 60-, and 75-degree cuts were compared with the conventional 90-degree cut. Resin-based mandibular osteotomy guides and a complementary fibula jig were manufactured using computer-aided design. Two representative clinical cases were presented to illustrate proof of principle and benefits.
RESULTS: The total surface area of apposing fibula and mandible surfaces in a conventional 90-degree cut was 103.8 ± 2.05 mm. Decreasing this angle to 75, 60, 45, 30, and 25 degrees yielded increased surface areas of 0.86%, 10.3%, 35.3%, 136.7%, and 194.3%, respectively. Cuts of 25 degrees also allowed for adequate bony contact in the setting of additional margin requirements up to 2.77 cm. Complementary 45-degree cuts provided excellent bone-to-bone contact in a free fibula reconstruction using resin guides and a jig. This angle also facilitated access of the saw to the distal mandible.
CONCLUSIONS: Virtual surgical planning is an increasingly recognized technology for optimizing surgical outcomes and minimizing operative time. We present a technique that takes advantage of the precision complementary osteotomies that this technology affords. By creating offset cuts, we can maximize bony contact and ensure adequate contact should additional margins or intraoperative adjustments be required. This flexibility maximizes the precision of premanufactured cutting guides, mitigates the constraints of sometimes unpredictable intraoperative environments, and maximizes bony contact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23147284     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318257576c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  11 in total

1.  A Virtual Surgical Planning Algorithm for Delayed Maxillomandibular Reconstruction.

Authors:  John T Stranix; Carrie S Stern; Michael Rensberger; Ian Ganly; Jay O Boyle; Robert J Allen; Joseph J Disa; Babak J Mehrara; Evan S Garfein; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Computer-Assisted Mandibular Reconstruction using a Patient-Specific Reconstruction Plate Fabricated with Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Techniques.

Authors:  Frank Wilde; Carl-Peter Cornelius; Alexander Schramm
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-02-25

3.  [Application of mixed reality technique for the surgery of oral and maxillofacial tumors].

Authors:  Z N Tang; Y Hui; L H Hu; Y Yu; W B Zhang; X Peng
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-12-18

4.  Step-by-step surgical technique for mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flap: application of digital technology in virtual surgical planning.

Authors:  G Succo; M Berrone; B Battiston; P Tos; F Goia; P Appendino; E Crosetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Customized mandibular reconstruction plates improve mechanical performance in a mandibular reconstruction model.

Authors:  Ralf Gutwald; Raimund Jaeger; Floor M Lambers
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  Fibular osteofasciocutaneous flap in computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction: technical aspects in oral malignancies.

Authors:  M Berrone; E Crosetti; P L Tos; M Pentenero; G Succo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Condyle dislocation following mandibular reconstruction using a fibula free flap: complication cases.

Authors:  Sang-Hoon Kang; Sanghoon Lee; Woong Nam
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-04-01

8.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of Isolated Orbital Floor Fractures Pre- and Post-Reconstruction with Standard Titanium Meshes and "Hybrid" Patient-Specific Implants.

Authors:  Guido R Sigron; Nathalie Rüedi; Frédérique Chammartin; Simon Meyer; Bilal Msallem; Christoph Kunz; Florian M Thieringer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Virtual Surgical Planning for Oncologic Mandibular and Maxillary Reconstruction.

Authors:  Paige L Myers; Jonas A Nelson; Evan B Rosen; Robert J Allen; Joseph J Disa; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-09-17

10.  In-House, Open-Source 3D-Software-Based, CAD/CAM-Planned Mandibular Reconstructions in 20 Consecutive Free Fibula Flap Cases: An Explorative Cross-Sectional Study With Three-Dimensional Performance Analysis.

Authors:  Lucas M Ritschl; Paul Kilbertus; Florian D Grill; Matthias Schwarz; Jochen Weitz; Markus Nieberler; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Andreas M Fichter
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.