Literature DB >> 23145621

Consonant recognition as a function of the number of stimulation channels in the Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant.

Lina A J Reiss1, Christopher W Turner, Sue A Karsten, Sheryl R Erenberg, Jessica Taylor, Bruce J Gantz.   

Abstract

Consonant recognition was measured as a function of the number of stimulation channels for Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant (CI) users, long-electrode CI users, and normal-hearing (NH) listeners in quiet and background noise. Short-electrode CI subjects were tested with 1-6 channels allocated to a frequency range of 1063-7938 Hz. Long-electrode CI subjects were tested with 1-6, 8, or 22 channels allocated to 188-7938 Hz, or 1-6 or 15 channels from the basal 15 electrodes allocated to 1063-7938 Hz. NH listeners were tested with simulations of each CI group/condition. Despite differences in intracochlear electrode spacing for equivalent channel conditions, all CI subject groups performed similarly at each channel condition and improved up to at least four channels in quiet and noise. All CI subject groups underperformed relative to NH subjects. These preliminary findings suggest that the limited channel benefit seen for CI users may not be due solely to increases in channel interactions as a function of electrode density. Other factors such as pre-operative patient history, location of stimulation in the base versus apex, or a limit on the number of electric channels that can be processed cognitively, may also interact with the effects of electrode contact spacing along the cochlea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23145621      PMCID: PMC3505213          DOI: 10.1121/1.4757735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectral and temporal cues for speech recognition: implications for auditory prostheses.

Authors:  Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing.

Authors:  D A Nelson; D J Van Tasell; A C Schroder; S Soli; S Levine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Matthew L Carlson; Colin L W Driscoll; René H Gifford; Geoffrey J Service; Nicole M Tombers; Becky J Hughes-Borst; Brian A Neff; Charles W Beatty
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Jorien Snel-Bongers; Jeroen J Briaire; Filiep J Vanpoucke; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  C W Turner; P E Souza; L N Forget
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Christopher Turner
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Combining acoustic and electrical hearing.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The quest for restoring hearing: Understanding ear development more completely.

Authors:  Israt Jahan; Ning Pan; Karen L Elliott; Bernd Fritzsch
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Delayed loss of hearing after hearing preservation cochlear implantation: Human temporal bone pathology and implications for etiology.

Authors:  Alicia M Quesnel; Hideko Heidi Nakajima; John J Rosowski; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Restoring autophagic flux attenuates cochlear spiral ganglion neuron degeneration by promoting TFEB nuclear translocation via inhibiting MTOR.

Authors:  Bin Ye; Quan Wang; Haixia Hu; Yilin Shen; Cui Fan; Penghui Chen; Yan Ma; Hao Wu; Mingliang Xiang
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 16.016

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.