Literature DB >> 23145527

Opioid sensitivity in mice selectively bred to consume or not consume methamphetamine.

Emily C Eastwood1, Tamara J Phillips.   

Abstract

There has been little investigation of genetic factors and associated mechanisms that influence risk for development of methamphetamine (MA) dependence. Selectively bred mouse lines that exhibit high (MAHDR) or low (MALDR) levels of MA intake in a two-bottle choice MA drinking (MADR) procedure provide a genetic tool for this purpose. These lines were used to determine whether opioid sensitivity and MA intake are genetically associated, because opioid-mediated pathways influence some effects of MA. Sensitivity to the analgesic effects of the μ-opioid receptor (MOP-r) agonist fentanyl (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 mg/kg) was examined using two acute thermal tests (hot plate and tail flick) and one chronic pain test (magnesium sulfate abdominal constriction). Locomotor stimulant responses to fentanyl (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 mg/kg) and morphine (10, 20, 30 mg/kg) were also examined. In addition, MADR was measured in the progenitor strains [(C57BL/6J (B6), DBA/2J (D2)] of the F2 population from which the selected lines were generated. The MADR lines did not differ in sensitivity to the analgesic effects of fentanyl; however, MALDR mice exhibited greater locomotor activation than MAHDR mice to both fentanyl and morphine. D2 mice consumed more MA than B6 mice. The line differences for MA consumption and morphine activation recapitulated B6 and D2 strain differences for these two traits, but not strain differences previously found for opioid analgesic responses. These results support a negative genetic correlation between MA consumption and sensitivity to the stimulant effects of opioids and suggest the involvement of MOP-r regulated systems in MA intake. Published 2012. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amphetamine; selective breeding; μ-opioid receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23145527      PMCID: PMC3796126          DOI: 10.1111/adb.12003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Biol        ISSN: 1355-6215            Impact factor:   4.280


  41 in total

1.  Antagonism of the frequency of phenylquinone-induced writhing in the mouse by weak analgesics and nonanalgesics.

Authors:  L C HENDERSHOT; J FORSAITH
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Short-term selective breeding as a tool for QTL mapping: ethanol preference drinking in mice.

Authors:  J K Belknap; S P Richards; L A O'Toole; M L Helms; T J Phillips
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  mu-Opioid receptor knockout mice are insensitive to methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization.

Authors:  Xine Shen; Chris Purser; Lu-Tai Tien; Chi-Tso Chiu; Ian A Paul; Rodney Baker; Horace H Loh; Ing K Ho; Tangeng Ma
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Antinociceptive effects of morphine, fentanyl, tramadol and their combination, in morphine-tolerant mice.

Authors:  Asunción Romero; Hugo F Miranda; Margarita M Puig
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect of plumbagin through inhibition of nuclear factor-κB activation.

Authors:  Pei Luo; Yuen Fan Wong; Lin Ge; Zhi Feng Zhang; Yuan Liu; Liang Liu; Hua Zhou
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.030

6.  Localization to chromosome 10 of a locus influencing morphine analgesia in crosses derived from C57BL/6 and DBA/2 strains.

Authors:  J K Belknap; J S Mogil; M L Helms; S P Richards; L A O'Toole; S E Bergeson; K J Buck
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.037

7.  A major QTL on chromosome 11 influences psychostimulant and opioid sensitivity in mice.

Authors:  C D Bryant; H P Chang; J Zhang; T Wiltshire; L M Tarantino; A A Palmer
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.449

8.  Differential genetic mediation of sensitivity to morphine in genetic models of opiate antinociception: influence of nociceptive assay.

Authors:  J S Mogil; B Kest; B Sadowski; J K Belknap
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  One or two genetic loci mediate high opiate analgesia in selectively bred mice.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Mogil; Przemyslaw Marek; Pamela Flodman; Anne M Spence; Wendy F Sternberg; Benjamin Kest; Bogdan Sadowski; John C Liebeskind
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Effects of acute and repeated ethanol exposures on the locomotor activity of BXD recombinant inbred mice.

Authors:  T J Phillips; M Huson; C Gwiazdon; S Burkhart-Kasch; E H Shen
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.455

View more
  21 in total

1.  Unique genetic factors influence sensitivity to the rewarding and aversive effects of methamphetamine versus cocaine.

Authors:  Noah R Gubner; Cheryl Reed; Carrie S McKinnon; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Differential genetic risk for methamphetamine intake confers differential sensitivity to the temperature-altering effects of other addictive drugs.

Authors:  John R K Mootz; Nicholas B Miner; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.449

3.  Methamphetamine Addiction Vulnerability: The Glutamate, the Bad, and the Ugly.

Authors:  Karen K Szumlinski; Kevin D Lominac; Rianne R Campbell; Matan Cohen; Elissa K Fultz; Chelsea N Brown; Bailey W Miller; Sema G Quadir; Douglas Martin; Andrew B Thompson; Georg von Jonquieres; Matthias Klugmann; Tamara J Phillips; Tod E Kippin
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Verification of a genetic locus for methamphetamine intake and the impact of morphine.

Authors:  Emily C Eastwood; Amy J Eshleman; Aaron Janowsky; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 5.  Commonalities and Distinctions Among Mechanisms of Addiction to Alcohol and Other Drugs.

Authors:  Angela R Ozburn; Aaron J Janowsky; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1 Regulation of Methamphetamine Intake and Related Traits.

Authors:  John H Harkness; Xiao Shi; Aaron Janowsky; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Morphine intake and the effects of naltrexone and buprenorphine on the acquisition of methamphetamine intake.

Authors:  E C Eastwood; T J Phillips
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.449

8.  Genetic factors involved in risk for methamphetamine intake and sensitization.

Authors:  John K Belknap; Shannon McWeeney; Cheryl Reed; Sue Burkhart-Kasch; Carrie S McKinnon; Na Li; Harue Baba; Angela C Scibelli; Robert Hitzemann; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  Non-genetic factors that influence methamphetamine intake in a genetic model of differential methamphetamine consumption.

Authors:  A M Stafford; C Reed; T J Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Genetic variation of the cutaneous HPA axis: an analysis of UVB-induced differential responses.

Authors:  Cezary Skobowiat; Reza Nejati; Lu Lu; Robert W Williams; Andrzej T Slominski
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 3.688

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.