The number of renal cancers has increased over the last ten years and patient survival in advanced stages remains very poor. Therefore, new therapeutic approaches for renal cancer are essential. Englerin A is a natural product with a very potent and selective cytotoxicity against renal cancer cells. This makes it a promising drug candidate that may improve current treatment standards for patients with renal cancers in all stages. However, little is known about englerin A's mode of action in targeting specifically renal cancer cells. Our study is the first to investigate the biological mechanism of englerin A action in detail. We report that englerin A is specific for renal tumor cells and does not affect normal kidney cells. We find that englerin A treatment induces necrotic cell death in renal cancer cells but not in normal kidney cells. We further show that autophagic and pyroptotic proteins are unaffected by the compound and that necrotic signaling in these cells coincided with production of reactive oxygen species and calcium influx into the cytoplasm. As the first study to analyze the biological effects of englerin A, our work provides an important basis for the evaluation and validation of the compound's use as an anti-tumor drug. It also provides a context in which to identify the specific target or targets of englerin A in renal cancer cells.
The number of renal cancers has increased over the last ten years and patient survival in advanced stages remains very poor. Therefore, new therapeutic approaches for renal cancer are essential. Englerin A is a natural product with a very potent and selective cytotoxicity against renal cancer cells. This makes it a promising drug candidate that may improve current treatment standards for patients with renal cancers in all stages. However, little is known about englerin A's mode of action in targeting specifically renal cancer cells. Our study is the first to investigate the biological mechanism of englerin A action in detail. We report that englerin A is specific for renal tumor cells and does not affect normal kidney cells. We find that englerin A treatment induces necrotic cell death in renal cancer cells but not in normal kidney cells. We further show that autophagic and pyroptotic proteins are unaffected by the compound and that necrotic signaling in these cells coincided with production of reactive oxygen species and calcium influx into the cytoplasm. As the first study to analyze the biological effects of englerin A, our work provides an important basis for the evaluation and validation of the compound's use as an anti-tumor drug. It also provides a context in which to identify the specific target or targets of englerin A in renal cancer cells.
Kidney cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the U.S with an estimated
60,920 new cases and 13,120 deaths in 2011. About 85% of all kidney cancers
are classified as renal-cell carcinomas, a malignancy arising from the renal
epithelium [1],
[2]. The
primary therapy for patients with renal-cell carcinoma is surgical excision.
However, approximately 25% of the patients show signs of local invasion or
metastasis making a complete excision difficult [2]. Once the disease is in an
advanced stage, surgery alone is not sufficient and the 5-year patient survival
drops from 70% to under 20% [1], [3]. Historically, the state of the
art treatment for patients with renal cell carcinoma has been immunomodulatory
therapy with interferon-α or interleukin-2 [4]. However, recent years have seen
an increase in the use of more targeted approaches to treat advanced stage renal
cancers. The discovery of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor gene lead to
the development of receptor tyrosine kinase-based therapies targeting the VEGF or
TGF-α signaling pathway [5], [6]. VHL regulates angiogenesis and a loss of this gene in
cancer cells results in increased production of growth factors like VEGF [7].
Alternatively, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors like Sorafenib that block
signaling through affected pathways are now approved or in clinical trials for the
treatment of advanced renal cancers [8]. However, these drugs are not applicable for all patients
with advanced renal cancers and severe side effects have been reported in some cases
[2], [9].Englerin A is a guaiane sesquiterpene that showed intriguing specificity as inhibitor
of renal cancer cell growth [10]. The natural product was isolated from the bark of
Phyllanthus engleri, a plant native to Tanzania and Zimbabwe.
Englerin A was screened for specific cytotoxic activity against a panel of cancer
cell lines (NCI 60-cell panel). In this screen, the compound showed renal cancer
specific GI50 values that were up to 1000fold lower than in other cancer
cell lines. GI50 values determined were as low as 11 nM for certain renal
cancer cell lines [10], [11]. Englerin A not only showed extraordinary specificity for
renal cancer cells, in some cases its potency was even higher then state of the art
treatments like Sorafenib [10], [12]. After its initial description in 2009, labs around the
world have described synthetic strategies to make the natural product [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], as well as
growing amounts of structure-activity relationship data [11], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Despite its high impact,
literature on englerin A is still limited and published articles mainly deal with
the synthesis of the compound. We now report for the first time a mechanism by which
englerin A acts on renal cancer cells to inhibit cell growth. Our results show that
englerin A specifically induces necrotic cell death in renal cancer cell lines, but
does not affect the viability of a glioblastoma cancer cell line or normal kidney
cells. Our study provides further insight into the biological activity of englerin
A.
Materials and Methods
Reagents
Englerin A was synthesized in the laboratory of Dr. William J. Chain according to
the protocol previously published [12]. Staurosporine was purchased from EMD Chemicals
(Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), ionomycin and chloroquine diphosphate was purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO).
Cell Lines and Cell Culture
Humanrenal cell carcinoma lines A-498 and UO-31, as well as the humanglioblastoma cell line SF-295 were obtained from the DCTD Tumor Repository of
the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland. Cells were cultured in
RPMI-1640 (Mediatech Inc., Manassas, VA) containing 10% fetal bovine
serum (FBS, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), 1% MEM nonessential
amino acids (NEAA, Mediatech) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (PenStrep,
Mediatech). HEK293 cells were purchased from ATCC (Rockville, MD) and maintained
in DMEM (Mediatech) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% NEAA and
1% PenStrep. Renal proximal tubule cells (RPTC) were purchased from
Lifeline Cell Technology (Frederick, MD). Cells were cultured in RenaLife
complete medium (Lifeline Cell Technology). All cells were cultured at 37°C
and 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator.
Cell Viability Assay
Cells were plated in 96-well plates in 90 μl of RPMI without phenol red and
without antibiotics, supplemented with 10% FBS and 2mM L-glutamine. Cell
were seeded at a density of 5,000 cells per well. Cells were allowed to anchor
down for 60min at 37 °C and 5 % CO2 in a humidified atmosphere. After
60 min, 10 μl of englerin A working solution or an equivalent volume of DMSO
diluted in RPMI medium was added. An englerin A stock solution was prepared by
dissolving the compound in DMSO at a concentration of 10 mM. All further
englerin A working solutions were prepared by diluting this stock solution with
RPMI medium to the desired final concentration as indicated. The volume of
englerin A stock solution or DMSO carrier control therefore never exceeded 0.1
% of the final volume. After adding the compound, cells were incubated
for 48h. Cell viability was determined using a Cell Proliferation Assay (XTT)
according to the manufacturer's protocol (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis,
IN).
Microscopy
Brightfield micrographs were taken using a Zeiss Axiovert200M microscope with a
40x objective. Acquired images were analyzed using AxioVision software. Scale
bars represent 20 μm.
Annexin V/PI assay
Cells were treated with either 1 μM englerin A, carrier DMSO or 5 μM
staurosporine for the indicated amount of time (1h or 3h). After incubation,
cells were trypsinized and stained for extracellular phosphatidyl serine
expression using FITC-tagged Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) as co-stain to
test cell membrane integrity (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Dyes were used
according to the manufacturer's protocol. Stained cells were analyzed using
a FACScan flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and CellQuest Pro analyzing
software.
Cell lysis and immunoblotting
Cell lysates were prepared using MLB lysis buffer (1% NP-40, 25 mM
HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 10%
glycerol, 10 mM MgCl2, 1mM EDTA and protease/phosphatase inhibitors).
Cell lysates were resolved using SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting. Protein
expression was detected with specific primary antibodies against PARP, caspase 3
and GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), as well as caspase 1 (EMD
Millipore, Billerica, MA), Beclin-1 (Epitomics, Burlingame, CA) and LC-3 (Novus
Biologicals, Littleton, CO). Binding of primary antibodies was detected using
IRDye 680 goat anti-mouse and IRDye 800 goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies.
Bands were visualized using an Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (Li-Cor
Biosciences, Lincoln, NE).
Caspase 3 activity assay
Caspase 3 activity in cells treated with englerin A, staurosporine or DMSO
carrier control was analyzed using a Caspase 3 Activity Assay Kit (Roche
Diagnostics). After incubation with the compound cells were lysed and cell
lysates were assayed according to the manufacturer's protocol.
ROS detection assay
Cells treated with englerin A, staurosporine or carrier control DMSO were tested
for their production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species using the Total ROS
Detection Kit (Enzo Lifesciences, Farmingdale, NY). Cells were treated according
to the manufacturer's protocol. The relative change in reactive oxygen or
reactive nitrogen species was measured using a FACScan flow cytometer (BD
Biosciences) and CellQuest Pro analyzing software.
Intracellular Ca2+ assay
Intracellular calcium concentration was measured after cells were treated with
englerin A, carrier DMSO or ionomycin positive control. After 30min incubation
with the compound 2 μM Fluo-3 AM (Life Technologies) was added for
subsequent 30min incubation. After incubation, cells were trypsinized and washed
with 1x PBS. Fluo-3 binding to Ca2+ ions was measured through an
increased fluorescence emission of the dye at 520 nm upon excitation at 485 nm.
Cells were analyzed using a FACScan flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and
CellQuest Pro analyzing software.
Results
Chemically synthesized englerin A reduces viability of renal cancer cell
lines
Englerin A has been described to have potent activity in inhibiting renal cancer
cell growth [10]. Recent publications describe methods for a synthetic
production of englerin A without the need of isolating the natural product [13], [14], [16], [17]. All englerin
A in our study (chemical structure see Fig. 1) has been
synthesized following the protocol described in our recent article by Li and
colleagues [12].
In order to evaluate the potency of the synthetic englerin A we screened its
cytotoxic effects on two humanrenal cancer cell lines (UO-31 and A-498) that
have been described before to be sensitive to the natural product. As control
cell line we used a humanglioblastoma cell line (SF-295), previously reported
to be unresponsive to englerin A [10]. Furthermore we analyzed
the effects of englerin A treatment on the viability of an immortalized kidney
cell line derived from normal humanembryonic kidney cells (HEK293) and normal
human renal epithelial cells (renal proximal tubule cells, RPTC). Viability was
determined by measuring the metabolic activity of the cells.
Figure 1
Englerin A selectively reduces cell viability in renal cancer
cells.
(A) Chemical Structure of englerin A. (B) Glioblastoma (SF-295), normal
immortalized kidney cells (HEK-293), renal proximal tubule cells (RPTC)
and renal cancer cells (UO-31, A-498) were incubated with the indicated
concentration of englerin A for 48 h. Cell viability was analyzed using
an XTT Cell Proliferation Assay. Results are shown in % viability
compared to a cell sample treated with the carrier DMSO. Values shown
represent the mean ± SEM of all experiments (n≥6). IC50 values
were calculated with Prism 5 using a non-linear regression fit
(log(inhibitor) vs. normalized response – variable slope).
Englerin A selectively reduces cell viability in renal cancer
cells.
(A) Chemical Structure of englerin A. (B) Glioblastoma (SF-295), normal
immortalized kidney cells (HEK-293), renal proximal tubule cells (RPTC)
and renal cancer cells (UO-31, A-498) were incubated with the indicated
concentration of englerin A for 48 h. Cell viability was analyzed using
an XTT Cell Proliferation Assay. Results are shown in % viability
compared to a cell sample treated with the carrier DMSO. Values shown
represent the mean ± SEM of all experiments (n≥6). IC50 values
were calculated with Prism 5 using a non-linear regression fit
(log(inhibitor) vs. normalized response – variable slope).We found that englerin A reduced the viability of renal cancer cells while it had
no cytotoxic effects on the glioblastoma control cell line (Fig. 1). Interestingly, the
compound did not affect the viability of HEK293 cells either and only changed
cell viability in RPTCs at very high concentrations (Fig. 1,
left). IC50 values were determined as 140.3 nM
for UO-31 cells and 53.25 nM for A-498 cells. The IC50 for RPTCs was
approximately seven magnitudes higher and was calculated as 2.53 M.
Englerin A causes morphological changes different from staurosporine-induced
apoptosis
To exclude englerin A effects on cell proliferation that would have accounted for
the observed decrease in metabolic activity we analyzed cell morphology after
treatment with englerin A using a brightfield microscope. Morphological changes
also allowed us to distinguish between apoptotic and necrotic cell death. For
this analysis we furthermore compared the cell morphology in response to
incubation with staurosporine, a known inducer of apoptosis [23].We found that englerin A treatment of renal cancer cells resulted in an obvious
change in cell morphology pointing to cell death (Fig. 2). No differences in cell shape or
structure could be observed in glioblastoma cells SF-295 treated with the
compound. Renal cancer cells treated with englerin A lost filopodia extensions,
eventually reaching a round, symmetrical structure, before fully detaching from
the matrix. Staurosporine induced apoptosis in both glioblastoma and renal
cancer cells. Apoptotic cell death was characterized by shrinkage of the cells
and the formation of apoptotic bodies surrounding the dying cell. Although the
treatment with englerin A caused a relative decrease in cell volume, we could
not observe the formation of clear apoptotic bodies. Both staurosporine and
englerin A caused the renal cancer cells to die, but in morphologically distinct
ways.
Figure 2
Englerin A induces cell death morphologically distinct from
staurosporine induced apoptosis.
Micrographs show the morphology of cells treated with englerin A or
staurosporine, a known inducer of apoptosis. Cells were treated with
either 1 μM englerin A or carrier DMSO for 60 min, or 1 μM
staurosporine for 5 h. Pictures were taken using a Zeiss Axiovert200 M
microscope with a 40× phase objective. For every treatment,
5–10 random fields of vision were acquired. The experiment was
repeated three times, micrographs shown are representative of the
average cell morphology upon treatment. Scale bars represent 20
μm.
Englerin A induces cell death morphologically distinct from
staurosporine induced apoptosis.
Micrographs show the morphology of cells treated with englerin A or
staurosporine, a known inducer of apoptosis. Cells were treated with
either 1 μM englerin A or carrier DMSO for 60 min, or 1 μM
staurosporine for 5 h. Pictures were taken using a Zeiss Axiovert200 M
microscope with a 40× phase objective. For every treatment,
5–10 random fields of vision were acquired. The experiment was
repeated three times, micrographs shown are representative of the
average cell morphology upon treatment. Scale bars represent 20
μm.
Englerin A treatment results in a loss of membrane integrity, but not in the
up-regulation of external phosphatidyl serine indicative of early apoptotic
stages
The morphologically different outcome in cells treated with the apoptosis-inducer
staurosporine led us to analyze if renal cancer cells die through necrotic
signaling processes rather than apoptosis when incubated with englerin A.
However, direct measures of necrosis are scarce and the most common way to
confirm necrotic cell death is by excluding that a cell dies through apoptosis
[24]. Early
apoptotic stages are characterized by an increase of phosphatidyl serine (PS) on
the extracellular side of the cell membrane followed by the loss of membrane
integrity in the late apoptotic stages [25]. We used FITC-labeled
Annexin V and propidium iodide to analyze these two parameters by flow
cytometry, which is a common approach to determine if cell death is apoptotic or
necrotic [26], [27]. We quantified the cell subpopulations corresponding
to early apoptotic and late apoptotic/necrotic stages by measuring the
percentage of cells expressing extracellular PS with or without the loss of
membrane integrity (Fig.
3).
Figure 3
Englerin A does not lead to up-regulation of extracellular
phosphatidyl serine.
Cells were treated with either 1 μM englerin A or carrier DMSO for 60
min, or 5 μM staurosporine for 3 h. After incubation, cells were
trypsinized and stained for extracellular phosphatidyl serine expression
using FITC-tagged Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) as co-stain to
test cell membrane integrity. Shown is a result representative of three
independent experimental repeats. Quantifications and statistics of all
data are depicted as bar graphs and show the distribution of cells
testing positive for Annexin V binding (early apoptotic stages) or
Annexin V binding and propidium iodide uptake (late apoptotic
stages/necrotic death). Values shown are mean ± SEM
(n = 3), statistically significant differences are
marked with asterisks (*** p<0.001),
n.s. = not significant.
Englerin A does not lead to up-regulation of extracellular
phosphatidyl serine.
Cells were treated with either 1 μM englerin A or carrier DMSO for 60
min, or 5 μM staurosporine for 3 h. After incubation, cells were
trypsinized and stained for extracellular phosphatidyl serine expression
using FITC-tagged Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) as co-stain to
test cell membrane integrity. Shown is a result representative of three
independent experimental repeats. Quantifications and statistics of all
data are depicted as bar graphs and show the distribution of cells
testing positive for Annexin V binding (early apoptotic stages) or
Annexin V binding and propidium iodide uptake (late apoptotic
stages/necrotic death). Values shown are mean ± SEM
(n = 3), statistically significant differences are
marked with asterisks (*** p<0.001),
n.s. = not significant.As expected, the control cell line SF-295 did not show a significant increase in
apoptotic cell populations when treated with englerin A or the DMSO carrier
control. Staurosporine treatment caused apoptotic cell death in all cell lines
accompanied by an increase in both early and late apoptotic cell populations.
Renal cancer cells A-498 were the most sensitive, showing the highest percentage
(27%) of late apoptotic/dead cells. SF-295 and UO-31 cell lines showed
elevated populations in the early apoptotic stages of about 12–20%.
A clear increase in early apoptotic cells was also visible after 1h of treatment
with staurosporine (Fig. S1).Interestingly, englerin A treatment did not affect the cell populations in the
same way. We found no significant change of early apoptotic cell populations
(Annexin V single positive) in either UO-31 or A-498 cells after treatment with
englerin A. The treatment caused the cells to lose membrane integrity early,
leading to a double positive staining of the cells. While the percentage of
cells in the early apoptotic sector did not increase, we observed a
statistically significant increase to approximately 10–15% dead
cells in UO-31 cell samples and a double positive population of up to 27%
in A-498 cells after 1 h of treatment (Fig. 3, bar graphs). Even at a later
time-point the number of single positive, early apoptotic cells did not increase
in the englerin A treatments (Fig. S1). DMSO treatment of both renal cancer cell
lines (UO-31 and A-498) did not induce a significant up-regulation of either
single positive (Annexin V) or double positive (Annexin V and PI)
populations.
Englerin A induced cell death is independent from PARP cleavage and Caspase 3
activity
Apoptotic cell death is in part mediated by effector caspases like caspase 3 that
cleave and activate downstream targets like poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP).
PARP is thought to aid in apoptotic signaling by depleting the cells energy
resources [28]. Cleavage and activation of these proteins is
therefore a marker for an activated apoptotic signaling cascade. To further
confirm that renal cancer cells treated with englerin A do not die through
apoptosis we tested the cleavage of PARP (Fig. 4) and the cleavage
and activity of caspase 3 (Fig.
4). As a control, treatment of SF-295
cells with staurosporine for 4 or 5 h resulted in cleaved protein bands at 17
and 19 kDa indicative of the active protein fragments. Similarly, staurosporine
treatment of SF-295 cells caused the cleavage of PARP as indicated by the 89kDa
cleaved fragment. We found that englerin A did not affect the cleavage of these
two proteins in SF-295 or the renal cancer cells (UO-31 and A-498). We could not
detect bands for cleaved caspase 3 or PARP when treating the cell lines with
englerin A for 1 or 4 hours (Fig.
4). Control treatments of all cell lines with
the carrier DMSO for the same amount of time did not result in detectable
cleavage of caspase 3 or PARP (Fig.
4).
Figure 4
Englerin A does not induce cleavage of caspase 3, PARP, caspase 1 or
the autophagic markers LC-3 and Beclin-1.
Cells were treated with either 1 μM englerin A, carrier DMSO or 5
μM staurosporine for the indicated amount of time. (A) After the
incubation, cells were lysed and lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting
for PARP cleavage or full-length and cleaved caspase 3 (Casp3-fl,
Casp3-cl). Equal protein loading was confirmed by probing for GAPDH.
Full-length and cleaved bands are indicated. The experiment was repeated
three times. (B) Alternatively, after incubation cells were lysed and
caspase 3 activity was tested using a caspase 3 activity assay kit.
Values shown are means ± SEM (n = 6),
statistically significant differences are marked with asterisks
(*** p<0.001). (C) Cells were treated with either 1
μM englerin A, carrier DMSO for 60min or 50 μM chloroquine
diphosphate (Chloro) for 18 h. After the incubation, cells were lysed
and lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting for Beclin-1, LC3-I/II and
caspase 1 cleavage (proenzyme p45 and cleaved active subunit p20). Equal
protein loading was confirmed by probing for GAPDH. All membranes were
analyzed using IRDye secondary antibodies and a Licor Odyssey system.
Membranes shown are from representative experiments.
Englerin A does not induce cleavage of caspase 3, PARP, caspase 1 or
the autophagic markers LC-3 and Beclin-1.
Cells were treated with either 1 μM englerin A, carrier DMSO or 5
μM staurosporine for the indicated amount of time. (A) After the
incubation, cells were lysed and lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting
for PARP cleavage or full-length and cleaved caspase 3 (Casp3-fl,
Casp3-cl). Equal protein loading was confirmed by probing for GAPDH.
Full-length and cleaved bands are indicated. The experiment was repeated
three times. (B) Alternatively, after incubation cells were lysed and
caspase 3 activity was tested using a caspase 3 activity assay kit.
Values shown are means ± SEM (n = 6),
statistically significant differences are marked with asterisks
(*** p<0.001). (C) Cells were treated with either 1
μM englerin A, carrier DMSO for 60min or 50 μM chloroquine
diphosphate (Chloro) for 18 h. After the incubation, cells were lysed
and lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting for Beclin-1, LC3-I/II and
caspase 1 cleavage (proenzyme p45 and cleaved active subunit p20). Equal
protein loading was confirmed by probing for GAPDH. All membranes were
analyzed using IRDye secondary antibodies and a Licor Odyssey system.
Membranes shown are from representative experiments.To confirm this result we analyzed caspase 3 activity with an ELISA based assay
that measures enzymatic activity directly through the cleavage of a caspase 3
substrate. As expected, staurosporine treatment resulted in an increase of
caspase 3 activity in both the glioblastoma control cell line and the renal
cancer cell line A-498. Englerin A treatment did not lead to any significant
increases in enzyme activity indicative of caspase 3 activation (Fig. 4).
Englerin A does not induce caspase 1 cleavage
Pyroptosis is a mode of cell death caused by inflammation pathways. Signaling is
independent from the apoptosis-related effector caspases 3 and 7, but involves
the release of active interleukin-1β mediated by caspase 1 [29], [30].
Here we measured caspase 1 cleavage as an indicator of pyroptotic cell death. We
followed the dynamics of caspase 1 activation by detecting the levels of the 45
kDa pro-enzyme and the 20 kDa reduced caspase 1 isoform after treatment with
englerin A (Fig.
4). Interestingly, we found that caspase 1 is
activated to a low level in both tested types of cell lines, with differing
expression levels that are highest in SF-295 cells and lowest in A-498 cells. We
detected slight bands for cleaved caspase 1 isoforms in samples of SF-295glioblastoma cells and UO-31 renal cancer cells. However, treatment with
englerin A did not significantly increase the levels of caspase 1 cleavage
indicative of pyroptotic signaling. Band intensities for the cleaved caspase 1
fragment are similarly low. Levels of p45 pro-enzyme barely change upon englerin
A treatment (Fig.
4)
Englerin A does not induce autophagy
Autophagy is a cellular process in which cytoplasmic material is degraded with
the help of lysosomes. The mechanism per se is a recycling pathway that is
generally associated with cell survival. However, there are reports of cells
undergoing a mode of cell death in which cells up-regulate autophagic signaling
(even though autophagy is not the cause of cell death in this scenario). The
result is called autophagic cell death [31], [32]. The activation of
autophagy can be analyzed by following the processing of the autophagic marker
LC3 and its conversion from the LC3 I isoform to the LC3 II form that is
accompanied by a change in molecular weight [31]. Another earlier marker
for autophagy is Beclin-1, which is up-regulated upon induction of autophagy and
triggers the formation of autophagosomes [33], [34].We determined if englerin A treatment induced autophagy in the experimental cell
lines by following changes in LC3 and Beclin-1 (Fig. 4). As a positive
control for the detection of the LC3 II isoform we treated all cell lines with
50 μM chloroquine (Chloro) for 18 h, a substance shown to arrest autophagy
at the autophagosomal stage resulting in increased levels of LC3 II [35], [36]. Treatment
with chloroquine resulted in a strong increase of LC3 II levels in all tested
cells. The LC3 I isoform was detectable in all cell lines under all treatment
conditions. However, treatment with englerin A or the carrier DMSO did not
result in a significant up-regulation of LC3 II. Even though we were able to
detect faint bands for this LC3 isoforms in SF-295 and UO-31 cells, the level if
LC3 II did not significantly increase upon englerin A treatment (Fig. 4).Beclin-1 levels could be detected in all experimental cell lines. Lowest levels
were found in SF-295 cells, highest levels in A-498 cells. Treatment with
englerin A or chloroquine did not result in differences in Beclin-1 levels in
either glioblastoma or renal cancer cells. Englerin A did not lead to a
significant up-regulation of Beclin-1 expression levels (Fig. 4).
Englerin A causes the production of reactive oxygen species
Oxidative stress induced by excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS)
is a known factor causing necrotic cell death [24]. We therefore sought to
analyze if englerin A caused an increase of intracellular ROS. We treated SF-295
and A-498 cells with the compound and measured the content of total reactive
oxygen and nitrogen species (Fig.
5).
Figure 5
Englerin A induces production of reactive oxygen species and
increased concentration of intracellular Ca2+.
(A) Cells were treated with either 1 μM englerin A or carrier DMSO
for 60 min. The relative change in reactive oxygen (ROS) or reactive
nitrogen species (RNS) compared to cells treated with the carrier DMSO
was measured using the Total ROS detection kit. Histograms show
fluorescence intensities in a representative experiment (left panel).
Quantified relative changes in ROS/RNS shown (right panel) are means
± SEM (n = 5), statistically significant
differences are marked with asterisks (* p<0.05). (B) Cells were
treated with either 1 μM englerin A or carrier DMSO for 60 min, or
10 μM ionomycin for 50 min. Fluo-3 binding to Ca2+
ions was measured through an increased fluorescence emission of the dye
at 520 nm upon excitation at 485 nm. Histograms show fluorescence
intensities in a representative experiment (left panel). Quantified
relative changes in intracellular calcium ions shown (right panel) are
means ± SEM (n = 3), statistically
significant differences are marked with asterisks (* p<0.05,
*** p<0.001).
Englerin A induces production of reactive oxygen species and
increased concentration of intracellular Ca2+.
(A) Cells were treated with either 1 μM englerin A or carrier DMSO
for 60 min. The relative change in reactive oxygen (ROS) or reactive
nitrogen species (RNS) compared to cells treated with the carrier DMSO
was measured using the Total ROS detection kit. Histograms show
fluorescence intensities in a representative experiment (left panel).
Quantified relative changes in ROS/RNS shown (right panel) are means
± SEM (n = 5), statistically significant
differences are marked with asterisks (* p<0.05). (B) Cells were
treated with either 1 μM englerin A or carrier DMSO for 60 min, or
10 μM ionomycin for 50 min. Fluo-3 binding to Ca2+
ions was measured through an increased fluorescence emission of the dye
at 520 nm upon excitation at 485 nm. Histograms show fluorescence
intensities in a representative experiment (left panel). Quantified
relative changes in intracellular calcium ions shown (right panel) are
means ± SEM (n = 3), statistically
significant differences are marked with asterisks (* p<0.05,
*** p<0.001).In our study, englerin A did not affect the relative amount of ROS in SF-295
cells when compared to a treatment with the carrier control DMSO. However, A-498
cells reacted strongly to englerin A by producing ROS concentrations
significantly higher than in the control cells. The total amount of reactive
species was about 2.5-fold higher when A-498 cells were treated with englerin
A.
Englerin A induces an increase in intracellular Ca2+
concentration
Calcium has been shown to regulate necrotic signaling. Excessive influx of
extracellular Ca2+ into the cells can stimulate both the
production of reactive oxygen species and necrotic cell death [24]. We measured
the effects of englerin A on intracellular Ca2+ concentrations
using the calcium indicator Fluo-3. This dye allowed us to quantify the amount
of intracellular calcium ions after treatment with englerin A (Fig. 5). The
relative Ca2+ concentration did not change when SF-295 cells
were incubated with englerin A. Ionomycin, a known inducer of
Ca2+ influx into the cell, doubled the measured ions [37]. Treatment
of A-498 renal cancer cells with englerin A significantly increased
intracellular calcium to an even higher extent then ionomycin. While ionomycin
doubled the amount of intracellular calcium, englerin A resulted in 4-fold
higher concentrations.
Discussion
The increased incidence of renal tumors around the world presents a serious problem
[1], [38]. For
patients with renal tumors in advanced stages, effective chemotherapeutics are
scarce and commonly used drugs like Sunitinib have been associated with serious side
effects [9]. The
search for new therapeutics therefore has to be focused on treatments that are not
only effective in fighting the tumors, but also specific enough to not harm
non-tumor cells and to avoid adverse side effects. The natural product englerin A is
a compound that potentially fits these criteria. Its high selectivity and potency
against renal cancer cells put it in the focus of many research groups. However,
little is known about its mode of action, besides targeting these cells with a high
specificity [10]. In order to fully evaluate englerin A's use as a
therapeutic agent and to anticipate possible side effects it is necessary to
understand the mechanism by which the compound affects renal cancer cells.Here we show for the first time how englerin A kills renal cancer cells. Importantly,
we also report that englerin A is in fact specific for cancerous renal cells and
does not affect normal kidney cells. As to the mode of action, we found that
englerin A induces a necrotic form of cell death in the sensitive cells. Apoptotic
markers like phosphatidyl serine externalization, effector caspase activation or
PARP cleavage are not up-regulated after treatment with englerin A. Plasma membrane
permeabilization happens quickly and cells don't form apoptotic bodies. At the
same time autophagy levels are not affected by the treatment and the compound does
not seem to induce pyroptosis-like processes. However, the mode of cell death
includes an increased production of reactive oxygen species and rising levels of
intracellular calcium ions either as part of the necrotic signaling or a result
thereof.The potency of a compound is an important measure of its qualification as a drug.
Half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) in the nanomolar range or
lower are desirable. At the same time a low IC50 increases the likelihood
of a good selectivity of the drug. With IC50 values in the lower
nanomolar range (140.3 nM for UO-31 cells and 53.25 nM for A-498 cells) englerin
A's has a potency that makes it a suitable drug candidate. Tests with non-renal
or non-cancer cell types also proved its extraordinary selectivity. While
significantly reducing the viability of renal cancer cells, englerin A does not
assert cytotoxic effects on glioblastoma cells (SF-295) or immortalized human kidney
cells (HEK-293) in concentrations of more then two magnitudes higher then the
IC50 for renal cancer cells. Englerin A did not affect viability of
normal human kidney cells either as the IC50 values tested in renal
proximal tubule cells show. The compound's IC50 values were
approximately 7 magnitudes higher in this cell type. Englerin A therefore shows both
potency and selectivity for renal cancer cells.Over the last decades, it became clear that the pathways leading to cell death are
very diverse and a simple classification into only two categories, apoptosis and
necrosis, based on one test is not sufficient. The Nomenclature Committee on Cell
Death therefore proposed a system that helps separating the different ways of cell
death by their morphological features and the cellular signaling pathways involved.
Their guidelines help classifying modes of cell death by analyzing a set of
different parameters [24], [39]. Using this classification system we were able to
characterize the mode of death induced by englerin A as part of the necrotic types
of cell death. Brightfield pictures of cells treated with the compound led us to
believe early on that the mechanism was different from typical apoptotic inducers
like staurosporine. The lack of apoptotic body formation and the quick loss of
membrane integrity, which started as early as 20–30 min after the start of the
treatment with englerin A, pointed towards necrotic rather than apoptotic signaling.
However, to be certain we analyzed the changes in cell morphology and signaling in
more detail to confirm our initial observations. Unfortunately there is no test
measuring distinct markers for necrotic signaling [24]. In order to confirm necrosis it
is therefore common practice to rather test for the absence of apoptotic markers. A
lack of phosphatidyl serine up-regulation on the plasma membrane, the failure to
detect activation of effector caspases and missing cleavage of PARP eliminated a
possible involvement of apoptotic signaling. Among the non-apoptotic death pathways
we were able to exclude autophagic cell death due to the lack of LC3 processing and
the absence of changes in Beclin-1 levels, leaving our initial hypothesis of a
necrotic cell death confirmed. The nonexistence of caspase 3 activation made
pyroptosis a likely candidate for the mode of cell death. Recent publications
connected this atypical cell death modality to a multi-protein complex called the
inflammasome, which includes caspase 1 and leads to the production of interleukin
1β, a process relevant for certain inflammatory reactions [30], [39]. However,
caspase 1 was not activated by englerin A treatment eliminating this candidate as
well.Typical inducers of necrotic signaling include an overproduction of reactive oxygen
species (ROS) and an uncontrolled influx of calcium ions into the cytoplasmic space
[24].
Interestingly, we were able to detect both events after treatment of renal cancer
cells with englerin A. The increase of total ROS was easily detectable after only 30
min, as well as a significantly higher intracellular calcium concentration. Both
parameters are therefore likely to be involved in the cell death induced by englerin
A. However, the exact signaling pathways leading to the production of ROS and the
influx of calcium in this scenario are not known. Further investigation is necessary
to clarify the exact involvement of these molecules in the necrotic process.Differential expression of proteins regulating the influx of ions into the cell and
the production of ROS might play a role in causing englerin A's selectivity for
renal cancer cells. Factors that could contribute to malfunctions in these areas are
imbalance of channel proteins, a change in membrane composition or a disturbance in
the mitochondrial machinery [24]. Englerin A could develop a selectivity for cells that
already have a predisposition for a disturbance of these processes due to
differential expression of the proteins involved. It has been shown that a variety
of ion channels and transmembrane transporters are overexpressed in tumor tissues,
including channels for K+, Na+ or
Ca2+ ions [40]. In humanrenal cell carcinomas in particular two
potassium ion channels of the ether-a-go-go (EAG) family were reported to be
up-regulated [41].
An additional possible target is CXCR4, a C-X-C chemokine receptor that has been
reported by multiple groups to be up-regulated in renal cancers [42]. The receptor
transduces signals across the plasma membrane by increasing the intracellular
Ca2+ ion concentration [43]. Deregulation of this receptor
could also contribute to an abnormal Ca2+ influx and cause cellular
damage.Renal cancer cells harbor a set of known mutations that distinguish them from normal
kidney cells [44]. The Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor gene is the
most prominent gene that is frequently inactivated in renal cancers and mutations in
this gene have been associated with the development of sporadic clear cell renal
carcinomas [45].
We analyzed if the mutation status of genes commonly mutated in renal cancer cells
correlates with the sensitivity of these cells to englerin A. The somatic mutations
we compared affected the genes VHL, CDK2NA,
PTEN, TP53, NF2 and SETD2
(Fig. 6). A correlation of
this kind might give further insight into why englerin A is so selective in killing
renal cancer cells. We correlated the sensitivity of all renal cancer cell lines
from the NCI-60 panel and the SF-295glioblastoma control cell line to the
cells' known mutations [11], [44]. We found no functional correlation between englerin A
sensitivity and mutation status of the analyzed genes. Mutations in these genes are
therefore most likely not linked to englerin A sensitivity.
Figure 6
Englerin A sensitivity does not correlate with any known mutations in
kidney cancer cell lines.
Renal cell carcinoma cell lines from the NCI-60 cell panel and a glioblastoma
cell line (SF-295) were arranged by decreasing sensitivity to the englerin A
natural product as determined by Akee and colleagues. [11] The known mutation status
in the cell lines as characterized by Ikediobi and colleagues [44] and
as obtained from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Cancer Genome Project
web site (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/genetics/CGP) are shown in red
(mutated) or green (wild-type).
Englerin A sensitivity does not correlate with any known mutations in
kidney cancer cell lines.
Renal cell carcinoma cell lines from the NCI-60 cell panel and a glioblastoma
cell line (SF-295) were arranged by decreasing sensitivity to the englerin A
natural product as determined by Akee and colleagues. [11] The known mutation status
in the cell lines as characterized by Ikediobi and colleagues [44] and
as obtained from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Cancer Genome Project
web site (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/genetics/CGP) are shown in red
(mutated) or green (wild-type).We conclude that englerin A is an effective cytotoxic agent that reduces the
viability of renal cancer cells at a low concentration, but at the same time does
not harm other cell types including normal kidney cells. In renal cancer cells,
englerin A activates necrosis with coincident production of ROS and calcium influx.
Necrotic cell death can contribute to inflammatory reactions, and this is a
potential concern. However, englerin A does not induce inflammasome formation,
potentially reducing concerns about undesirable inflammatory side effects. Our study
is an important first step in evaluating englerin A's possible use as an
anti-cancer therapeutic. Even though further research is necessary to fully
understand the molecular targets of englerin A in renal cancer cells, our work
provides a valuable basis for a better understanding of englerin A's biological
actions. Englerin A remains one of the most promising drug candidates in development
for curing kidney cancer without the severe side effects of other treatments.Englerin A induced cell death follows a distinct time course and
differs morphologically from staurosporine induced apoptosis.
Cells were treated with either 1 μM englerin A or 5 μM staurosporine
for 1 h or 3 h. After incubation, cells were trypsinized and stained for
extracellular phosphatidyl serine expression using FITC-tagged Annexin V and
propidium iodide (PI) as co-stain to test cell membrane integrity. Shown is
a representative result of three independent experimental repeats. Dot plots
show cells testing positive for Annexin V binding (early apoptotic stages)
in the upper left quadrant and cells positive for Annexin V binding and
propidium iodide uptake (late apoptotic stages/necrotic death) in the upper
right quadrant. Numbers shown represent quadrant percentages related to
total number of cells.(EPS)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Tammy F Chu; Maria A Rupnick; Risto Kerkela; Susan M Dallabrida; David Zurakowski; Lisa Nguyen; Kathleen Woulfe; Elke Pravda; Flavia Cassiola; Jayesh Desai; Suzanne George; Jeffrey A Morgan; David M Harris; Nesreen S Ismail; Jey-Hsin Chen; Frederick J Schoen; Annick D Van den Abbeele; George D Demetri; Thomas Force; Ming Hui Chen Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: David M Fash; Cody J Peer; Zhenwu Li; Ian J Talisman; Sima Hayavi; Florian J Sulzmaier; Joe W Ramos; Carole Sourbier; Leonard Neckers; W Douglas Figg; John A Beutler; William J Chain Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Essa M Bajalia; Farah B Azzouz; Danielle A Chism; Derrek M Giansiracusa; Carina G Wong; Kristina N Plaskett; Anupam Bishayee Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Cheryl Carson; Pichai Raman; Jennifer Tullai; Lei Xu; Martin Henault; Emily Thomas; Sarita Yeola; Jianmin Lao; Mark McPate; J Martin Verkuyl; George Marsh; Jason Sarber; Adam Amaral; Scott Bailey; Danuta Lubicka; Helen Pham; Nicolette Miranda; Jian Ding; Hai-Ming Tang; Haisong Ju; Pamela Tranter; Nan Ji; Philipp Krastel; Rishi K Jain; Andrew M Schumacher; Joseph J Loureiro; Elizabeth George; Giuliano Berellini; Nathan T Ross; Simon M Bushell; Gül Erdemli; Jonathan M Solomon Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-22 Impact factor: 3.240