Literature DB >> 23143916

Top-down task sets for combined features: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for two stages in attentional object selection.

Monika Kiss1, Anna Grubert, Martin Eimer.   

Abstract

We studied whether visual search for targets defined by a combination of features from different dimensions is guided by separately represented target features or by an integrated representation of the target objects. In Experiment 1, participants searched for target singleton bars that were defined by a specific combination of color (red or blue) and size (small or large). The target arrays were preceded by cue arrays that contained a spatially uninformative color/size singleton. Behavioral spatial-cueing effects indicative of attentional capture were triggered only by cues that matched both target-defining features, but not by partially target-matching cues, suggesting that attention was guided by integrated object representations. However, the presence of reliable N2pc components for partially matching cues demonstrated that these cues did capture attention, in line with independent feature-based guidance of attention. This dissociation between the electrophysiological and behavioral markers of attentional capture was confirmed in Experiment 2, in which targets were defined by a color/size disjunction. Our results suggest that the attentional selection of targets that are defined by a combination of features is a two-stage process: Attention is initially captured by all target-matching features, but is then rapidly withdrawn from nontarget objects that share some but not all features with the current target.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23143916     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0391-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  15 in total

1.  Color-relation-based capture occurs globally.

Authors:  Huimin Hua; Jie Zhang; Yanju Li; Feng Du
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-04

2.  Biasing spatial attention with semantic information: an event coding approach.

Authors:  Tarek Amer; Davood G Gozli; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-21

3.  Differential brain mechanisms for processing distracting information in task-relevant and -irrelevant dimensions in visual search.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Hongbo Yu; Hermann J Müller; Stefan Pollmann; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  A meta-analysis of contingent-capture effects.

Authors:  Christian Büsel; Martin Voracek; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-31

5.  Early information processing contributions to object individuation revealed by perception of illusory figures.

Authors:  Claire K Naughtin; Jason B Mattingley; Paul E Dux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Emergence of the benefits and costs of grouping for visual search.

Authors:  Rachel Wu; Brianna McGee; Madelyn Rubenstein; Zoe Pruitt; Olivia S Cheung; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Immunity to attentional capture at ignored locations.

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Nicholas Gaspelin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Contingent orienting or contingent capture: a size singleton matching the target-distractor size relation cannot capture attention.

Authors:  Feng Du; Yue Yin; Yue Qi; Kan Zhang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

9.  Behavioral and ERP measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: poor reliability and lack of correlation with anxiety.

Authors:  Emily S Kappenman; Jaclyn L Farrens; Steven J Luck; Greg Hajcak Proudfit
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-04

10.  From Capture to Inhibition: How does Irrelevant Information Influence Visual Search? Evidence from a Spatial Cuing Paradigm.

Authors:  Christine Mertes; Edmund Wascher; Daniel Schneider
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.