Literature DB >> 30838527

Color-relation-based capture occurs globally.

Huimin Hua1,2, Jie Zhang1,2, Yanju Li1,2, Feng Du3,4.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that a distractor matching the target-nontarget color relation did not capture attention when it appeared outside of the attentional window, indicating that color-relation-based attention is lack of global selection. The present study examined whether a distractor best matching the target-nontarget color relation instead of the target color captured attention outside of the attentional window. The results consistently showed that peripheral distractors best matching the target-nontarget color relation instead of the target color captured attention outside of the attentional window. Additionally, color-relation-matched distractors outweighed target-color-matched distractors in capturing attention under this circumstance. This suggests that the color-relation-based attention shares the hallmark of global selection with the color-based attention. Combined with the previous finding of double dissociation of color-relation-based attention and color-based attention (Du & Jiao, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(4), 480-493, 2016; Du, Yin, Qi, & Zhang, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 1011-1018, 2014), preference for color-relation within the attentional window and priority for target color outside of the attentional window might be a strategic choice of visual attention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional capture; Attentional window; Relation-based attention

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30838527     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01573-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  24 in total

1.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex.

Authors:  S Treue; J C Martínez Trujillo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.

Authors:  Charles L Folk; Andrew B Leber; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-07

3.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.

Authors:  C L Folk; R W Remington; J C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search.

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2010-05

5.  Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: the effect of visual onsets and offsets.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-01

6.  The role of relational information in contingent capture.

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker; Charles L Folk; Roger W Remington
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Coordination of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control in human cortex.

Authors:  John T Serences; Sarah Shomstein; Andrew B Leber; Xavier Golay; Howard E Egeth; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-02

8.  Synergy of stimulus-driven salience and goal-directed prioritization: evidence from the spatial blink.

Authors:  Feng Du; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-11

9.  Visual field asymmetry in attentional capture.

Authors:  Feng Du; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Monika Kiss
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.