Literature DB >> 23143099

Surgical care improvement project in the value-based purchasing era: more harm than good?

Adam Weston1, Kathleen Caldera, Shira Doron.   

Abstract

The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) started in 2006 as a core measure to reduce perioperative morbidity and mortality, with many measures addressing perioperative antibiotic usage and timing. However, measures are often rolled out without consideration of their full impact, causing confusion, frustration, and possibly patient harm. We have provided examples of each. The institution of SCIP has markedly increased the compliance to its measures but little evidence shows that it provides any substantial benefit to patients, whereas this improved compliance comes at the cost of significant time, money, and staff resources. Despite this, several SCIP measures, which are currently incorporated into quality contracts, will be tied to Medicare reimbursement in 2013 under value-based purchasing, with third-party payers likely following suit. This may lead to inappropriate lower compensation of hospitals providing good care with questionable effects on patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23143099      PMCID: PMC3540044          DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  9 in total

1.  Should compliance with the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) process measures determine Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates?

Authors:  Nicole Garcia; Sandy Fogel; Christopher Baker; Stephen Remine; Jim Jones
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Association of surgical care improvement project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement.

Authors:  Angela M Ingraham; Mark E Cohen; Karl Y Bilimoria; Justin B Dimick; Karen E Richards; Mehul V Raval; Lee A Fleisher; Bruce L Hall; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Adherence to Surgical Care Improvement Project measures: the whole is greater than the parts.

Authors:  E Patchen Dellinger
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.165

4.  Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Authors:  J Stuart Wolf; Carol J Bennett; Roger R Dmochowski; Brent K Hollenbeck; Margaret S Pearle; Anthony J Schaeffer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Surgical site infection: still waiting on the revolution.

Authors:  Lawrence T Kim
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Surgical site infection prevention: time to move beyond the surgical care improvement program.

Authors:  Mary T Hawn; Catherine C Vick; Joshua Richman; William Holman; Rhiannon J Deierhoi; Laura A Graham; William G Henderson; Kamal M F Itani
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Reducing the risk of surgical site infections: did we really think SCIP was going to lead us to the promised land?

Authors:  Charles E Edmiston; Maureen Spencer; Brian D Lewis; Kellie R Brown; Peter J Rossi; Cindy R Henen; Heidi W Smith; Gary R Seabrook
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 2.150

8.  Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections.

Authors:  Jonah J Stulberg; Conor P Delaney; Duncan V Neuhauser; David C Aron; Pingfu Fu; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Hospital process compliance and surgical outcomes in medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Lauren H Nicholas; Nicholas H Osborne; John D Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-10
  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Which Complications Matter Most? Prioritizing Quality Improvement in Emergency General Surgery.

Authors:  John E Scarborough; Jessica Schumacher; Theodore N Pappas; Christopher C McCoy; Brian R Englum; Suresh K Agarwal; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Effectiveness of a care bundle to reduce surgical site infections in patients having open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  J Tanner; M Kiernan; R Hilliam; S Davey; E Collins; T Wood; J Ball; D Leaper
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Surgical site infection: poor compliance with guidelines and care bundles.

Authors:  David J Leaper; Judith Tanner; Martin Kiernan; Ojan Assadian; Charles E Edmiston
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Decreasing Surgical Site Infections after Ventral Hernia Repair: A Quality-Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Deepa V Cherla; Julie L Holihan; Juan R Flores-Gonzalez; Debbie F Lew; Richard J Escamilla; Tien C Ko; Lillian S Kao; Mike K Liang
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.150

5.  Evaluating disparities in inpatient surgical cancer care among American Indian/Alaska Native patients.

Authors:  Vlad V Simianu; Arden M Morris; Thomas K Varghese; Michael P Porter; Jeffrey A Henderson; Dedra S Buchwald; David R Flum; Sara H Javid
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Description of a multidisciplinary initiative to improve SCIP measures related to pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis compliance: a single-center success story.

Authors:  Tori Sutherland; Jennifer Beloff; Marie Lightowler; Xiaoxia Liu; Luigino Nascimben; Alan D Kaye; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2014-09-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.