Literature DB >> 21817889

Surgical site infection prevention: time to move beyond the surgical care improvement program.

Mary T Hawn1, Catherine C Vick, Joshua Richman, William Holman, Rhiannon J Deierhoi, Laura A Graham, William G Henderson, Kamal M F Itani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) improved surgical site infection (SSI) rates using national data at the patient level for both SCIP adherence and SSI occurrence.
BACKGROUND: The SCIP was established in 2006 with the goal of reducing surgical complications by 25% in 2010.
METHODS: National Veterans' Affairs (VA) data from 2005 to 2009 on adherence to 5 SCIP SSI prevention measures were linked to Veterans' Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program SSI outcome data. Effect of SCIP adherence and year of surgery on SSI outcome were assessed with logistic regression using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for procedure type and variables known to predict SSI. Correlation between hospital SCIP adherence and SSI rate was assessed using linear regression.
RESULTS: There were 60,853 surgeries at 112 VA hospitals analyzed. SCIP adherence ranged from 75% for normothermia to 99% for hair removal and all significantly improved over the study period (P < 0.001). Surgical site infection occurred after 6.2% of surgeries (1.6% for orthopedic surgeries to 11.3% for colorectal surgeries). None of the 5 SCIP measures were significantly associated with lower odds of SSI after adjusting for variables known to predict SSI and procedure type. Year was not associated with SSI (P = 0.71). Hospital SCIP performance was not correlated with hospital SSI rates (r = -0.06, P = 0.54).
CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to SCIP measures improved whereas risk-adjusted SSI rates remained stable. SCIP adherence was neither associated with a lower SSI rate at the patient level, nor associated with hospital SSI rates. Policies regarding continued SCIP measurement and reporting should be reassessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21817889     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822c6929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  49 in total

Review 1.  High inspired oxygen versus low inspired oxygen for reducing surgical site infection: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongye Wang; Shukun Hong; Yuanyuan Liu; Yan Duan; Hongmei Yin
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The dose makes the poison.

Authors:  Armand R J Girbes; René Robert; Paul E Marik
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Surgical site infections: epidemiology and microbiological aspects in trauma and orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Rose A Cooper
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Venous thromboembolism in colorectal surgery: skip SCIP or comply?

Authors:  H H Erem; R P Kiran; F H Remzi; J D Vogel
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Superficial Surgical Site Infection Following the Use of Intracutaneous Sutures Versus Staples.

Authors:  Elisabeth Maurer; Alexander Reuss; Katja Maschuw; Behnaz Aminossadati; Thomas Neubert; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Detlef K Bartsch
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Creation and Evaluation of New Porcine Model for Investigation of Treatments of Surgical Site Infection.

Authors:  Mahsa Mohiti-Asli; Marije Risselada; Megan Jacob; Behnam Pourdeyhimi; Elizabeth G Loboa
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.056

7.  Prevention of surgical site infections in bone and joint procedures.

Authors:  Ralf-Peter Vonberg; Petra Gastmeier
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.725

8.  Effectiveness of a care bundle to reduce surgical site infections in patients having open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  J Tanner; M Kiernan; R Hilliam; S Davey; E Collins; T Wood; J Ball; D Leaper
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Risk-adjusted pathologic margin positivity rate as a quality indicator in rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Nader N Massarweh; Chung-Yuan Hu; Y Nancy You; Brian K Bednarski; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; John M Skibber; Scott B Cantor; Janice N Cormier; Barry W Feig; George J Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Participation in quality measurement nationwide.

Authors:  Jennifer Lynn Irani
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.