OBJECTIVES: To determine whether high rates of compliance with perioperative processes of care used for public reporting and pay-for-performance are associated with lower rates of risk-adjusted mortality and high-risk surgical complications. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Medicare inpatient claims data (from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2006). Hierarchical logistic regression models assessed the relationship between adverse outcomes and hospital compliance with the surgical processes of care reported on the Hospital Compare Web site. SETTING: Two thousand US hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Beneficiaries who underwent 1 of 6 high-risk operations in 2005 and 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day postoperative mortality rate, venous thromboembolism, and surgical site infection. RESULTS: Process compliance ranged from 53.7% in low compliance hospitals to 91.4% in high compliance hospitals. Risk-adjusted outcomes did not vary at high compliance hospitals relative to medium compliance hospitals for mortality rate (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.05), surgical site infection (1.01; 0.90-1.13), or venous thromboembolism (1.04; 0.89-1.20). Outcomes also did not vary at low compliance hospitals. Stratified analyses by operation type confirm these trends for the 6 procedures individually. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available information on the Hospital Compare Web site will not help patients identify hospitals with better outcomes for high-risk surgery. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services needs to identify higher leverage process measures and devote greater attention to profiling hospitals based on outcomes to improve public reporting and pay-for-performance efforts.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether high rates of compliance with perioperative processes of care used for public reporting and pay-for-performance are associated with lower rates of risk-adjusted mortality and high-risk surgical complications. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Medicare inpatient claims data (from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2006). Hierarchical logistic regression models assessed the relationship between adverse outcomes and hospital compliance with the surgical processes of care reported on the Hospital Compare Web site. SETTING: Two thousand US hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Beneficiaries who underwent 1 of 6 high-risk operations in 2005 and 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day postoperative mortality rate, venous thromboembolism, and surgical site infection. RESULTS: Process compliance ranged from 53.7% in low compliance hospitals to 91.4% in high compliance hospitals. Risk-adjusted outcomes did not vary at high compliance hospitals relative to medium compliance hospitals for mortality rate (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.05), surgical site infection (1.01; 0.90-1.13), or venous thromboembolism (1.04; 0.89-1.20). Outcomes also did not vary at low compliance hospitals. Stratified analyses by operation type confirm these trends for the 6 procedures individually. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available information on the Hospital Compare Web site will not help patients identify hospitals with better outcomes for high-risk surgery. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services needs to identify higher leverage process measures and devote greater attention to profiling hospitals based on outcomes to improve public reporting and pay-for-performance efforts.
Authors: John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dale W Bratzler; Peter M Houck; Chesley Richards; Lynn Steele; E Patchen Dellinger; Donald E Fry; Claudia Wright; Allen Ma; Karina Carr; Lisa Red Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2005-02
Authors: Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: John D Birkmeyer; Therese A Stukel; Andrea E Siewers; Philip P Goodney; David E Wennberg; F Lee Lucas Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-11-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Evan M Graboyes; Melanie E Townsend; Dorina Kallogjeri; Jay F Piccirillo; Brian Nussenbaum Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Evan M Graboyes; Jennifer Gross; Dorina Kallogjeri; Jay F Piccirillo; Maha Al-Gilani; Michael E Stadler; Brian Nussenbaum Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Jennifer J Chung; Emily C Earl-Royal; M Kit Delgado; Jose L Pascual; Patrick M Reilly; Douglas J Wiebe; Daniel N Holena Journal: Am Surg Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Benjamin S Brooke; Francesca Dominici; Peter J Pronovost; Martin A Makary; Eric Schneider; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Surgery Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Nader N Massarweh; Chung-Yuan Hu; Y Nancy You; Brian K Bednarski; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; John M Skibber; Scott B Cantor; Janice N Cormier; Barry W Feig; George J Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ateev Mehrotra; Elizabeth M Sloss; Peter S Hussey; John L Adams; Susan Lovejoy; Nelson F Soohoo Journal: Med Care Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Ateev Mehrotra; Elizabeth M Sloss; Peter S Hussey; John L Adams; Susan Lovejoy; Nelson F SooHoo Journal: Med Care Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Adriana G Ramirez; Margaret C Tracci; George J Stukenborg; Florence E Turrentine; Benjamin D Kozower; R Scott Jones Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-08-05 Impact factor: 6.113