| Literature DB >> 23140574 |
Yufang Guo1, Sameer Khanal, Shunxue Tang, John E Bowers, Adam F Heesacker, Nelly Khalilian, Ervin D Nagy, Dong Zhang, Christopher A Taylor, H Thomas Stalker, Peggy Ozias-Akins, Steven J Knapp.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cultivated peanut or groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important oilseed crop with an allotetraploid genome (AABB, 2n = 4x = 40). Both the low level of genetic variation within the cultivated gene pool and its polyploid nature limit the utilization of molecular markers to explore genome structure and facilitate genetic improvement. Nevertheless, a wealth of genetic diversity exists in diploid Arachis species (2n = 2x = 20), which represent a valuable gene pool for cultivated peanut improvement. Interspecific populations have been used widely for genetic mapping in diploid species of Arachis. However, an intraspecific mapping strategy was essential to detect chromosomal rearrangements among species that could be obscured by mapping in interspecific populations. To develop intraspecific reference linkage maps and gain insights into karyotypic evolution within the genus, we comparatively mapped the A- and B-genome diploid species using intraspecific F2 populations. Exploring genome organization among diploid peanut species by comparative mapping will enhance our understanding of the cultivated tetraploid peanut genome. Moreover, new sources of molecular markers that are highly transferable between species and developed from expressed genes will be required to construct saturated genetic maps for peanut.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23140574 PMCID: PMC3532320 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-608
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Effect of SSR repeat motif types on frequency of polymorphism among tetraploid and diploid genotypes
| GT/CA | 285 | 8.1 | 2.7 | 10.8 | 21.6 | 51.4 | 75.7 | 78.4 |
| AG/CT | 37 | 16.8 | 14.0 | 24.2 | 32.3 | 57.5 | 70.2 | 73.0 |
| AT | 69 | 14.5 | 13.0 | 23.2 | 21.7 | 47.8 | 69.6 | 76.8 |
| CG | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CCG/CGG | 41 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 4.9 | 7.3 | 29.3 | 56.1 | 61.0 |
| ACC/GGT | 149 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 5.4 | 19.5 | 39.0 | 67.8 | 73.2 |
| ACG/CGT | 55 | 3.6 | 0 | 3.6 | 14.5 | 27.3 | 60.0 | 67.3 |
| AGC/GCT | 52 | 0 | 1.9 | 3.8 | 11.5 | 25.0 | 59.6 | 65.4 |
| AGG/CCT | 107 | 3.7 | 1.9 | 6.5 | 10.3 | 26.2 | 55.1 | 65.4 |
| AAC/GTT | 141 | 5.7 | 5.0 | 9.2 | 17.0 | 43.3 | 70.2 | 78.7 |
| AAG/CTT | 519 | 5.4 | 4.8 | 9.6 | 24.5 | 39.1 | 66.5 | 74.2 |
| ACT/AGT | 130 | 2.3 | 3.8 | 6.2 | 12.3 | 34.6 | 63.8 | 73.1 |
| ATC/GAT | 127 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 7.9 | 13.4 | 39.4 | 67.7 | 75.6 |
| AAT/ATT | 168 | 6.0 | 3.6 | 6.0 | 20.2 | 44.6 | 70.8 | 79.2 |
Number of loci, map length and density of each linkage group in the 9484x30081 map
| 1B | 98.2 | 38 | 2.7 | 10 |
| 2B | 138.3 | 35 | 4.1 | 1 |
| 3B | 117.8 | 62 | 1.9 | 0 |
| 4/9B | 209.9 | 80 | 2.7 | 1 |
| 4/9B.1 | 3.4 | 2 | 3.4 | 0 |
| 4/9B.2 | 8.6 | 2 | 8.6 | 0 |
| 4/9B.3 | 47.1 | 7 | 7.9 | 1 |
| 5B | 114.8 | 52 | 2.3 | 0 |
| 5B.1 | 30.1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 |
| 6B | 164.2 | 44 | 3.8 | 1 |
| 7B | 36.6 | 13 | 3.1 | 2 |
| 8B | 185.1 | 60 | 3.1 | 0 |
| 8B.1 | 7.1 | 5 | 1.8 | 0 |
| 10B | 107.1 | 39 | 2.8 | 2 |
| LG11 | 1.1 | 2 | 1.1 | 0 |
| LG12 | 9.2 | 2 | 9.2 | 0 |
| Whole map | 1278.6 | 449 | 2.9 | 18 (4.0%) |
Figure 1The alignment of A- and B- genome linkage maps of Alignment of B- genome linkage groups with A- genome linkage groups, orthologous markers are highlighted in bold. The B- genome map was based on EST-SSR markers and genomic SSR markers, and was obtained through the analysis of 94 F2 plants from the intraspecific crossing of A. batizocoi. The A- genome map was based on EST-SSR markers and genomic SSR markers, obtained through the analysis of 94 F2 plants from the intraspecific crossing of A. duranensis. The dotted lines indicate the correspondences between loci.
Number of common markers between the corresponding linkage groups from A- and B-genome genetic maps
| Linkage group | 1A | 2A | 3A | 4A | 5A | 6A | 7A | 8A | 9A | 10A | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | No. of marker loci | 73 | 40 | 89 | 67 | 66 | 51 | 56 | 75 | 55 | 61 | 633 |
| Linkage group | No. of marker loci | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1B | 38 | | 12 | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2B | 35 | | | 13 | | | | | | | | | |
| 3B | 62 | | | | 22 | | | | | | | | |
| 4/9B* | 91 | | | | | 18 | | | | | 13 | | |
| 5B** | 58 | | | | | | 25 | | | | | | |
| 6B | 44 | | | | | | | 15 | | | | | |
| 7B | 13 | | | | | | | | 7 | 2 | | | |
| 8B*** | 65 | | | | | | | | 9 | 21 | | | |
| 10B | 39 | | | | | | | | | | | 10 | |
| Total | 445 | 167 |
*4/9B including 4/9B, 4/9B.1, 4/9B.2, and 4/9B.3.
**5B including 5B and 5B.1.
***8B including 8B and 8B.1.