Literature DB >> 23139645

Exploring residue component contributions to dynamical network models of allostery.

Adam T Vanwart1, John Eargle, Zaida Luthey-Schulten, Rommie E Amaro.   

Abstract

Allosteric regulation in biological systems is of considerable interest given the vast number of proteins that exhibit such behavior. Network models obtained from molecular dynamics simulations have been shown to be powerful tools for the analysis of allostery. In this work, different coarse-grain residue representations (nodes) are used together with a dynamical network model to investigate models of allosteric regulation. This model assumes that allosteric signals are dependent on positional correlations of protein substituents, as determined through molecular dynamics simulations, and uses correlated motion to generate a signaling weight between two given nodes. We examine four types of network models using different node representations in Cartesian coordinates: the (i) residue alpha-carbons, (ii) sidechain center of mass, (iii) backbone center of mass, and the entire (iv) residue center of mass. All correlations are filtered by a dynamic contact map that defines the allowable interactions between nodes based on physical proximity. We apply the four models to imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase (IGPS), which provides a well-studied experimental framework in which allosteric communication is known to persist across disparate protein domains (e.g. a protein dimer interface). IGPS is modeled as a network of nodes and weighted edges. Optimal allosteric pathways are traced using the Floyd Warshall algorithm for weighted networks, and community analysis (a form of hierarchical clustering) is performed using the Girvan-Newman algorithm. Our results show that dynamical information encoded in the residue center of mass must be included in order to detect residues that are experimentally known to play a role in allosteric communication for IGPS. More broadly, this new method may be useful for predicting pathways of allosteric communication for any biomolecular system in atomic detail.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23139645      PMCID: PMC3489502          DOI: 10.1021/ct300377a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  51 in total

1.  Imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase from Thermotoga maritima. Quaternary structure, steady-state kinetics, and reaction mechanism of the bienzyme complex.

Authors:  S Beismann-Driemeyer; R Sterner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-03-22       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Developing an energy landscape for the novel function of a (beta/alpha)8 barrel: ammonia conduction through HisF.

Authors:  Rommie Amaro; Emad Tajkhorshid; Zaida Luthey-Schulten
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Thr-431 and Arg-433 are part of a conserved sequence motif of the glutamine amidotransferase domain of CTP synthases and are involved in GTP activation of the Lactococcus lactis enzyme.

Authors:  Martin Willemoës
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Small-molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions: progressing towards the dream.

Authors:  Michelle R Arkin; James A Wells
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 84.694

5.  Generalized correlation for biomolecular dynamics.

Authors:  Oliver F Lange; Helmut Grubmüller
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-03-01

Review 6.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  The limits of protein secondary structure prediction accuracy from multiple sequence alignment.

Authors:  R B Russell; G J Barton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-12-20       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  p-aminobenzoate synthesis in Escherichia coli: kinetic and mechanistic characterization of the amidotransferase PabA.

Authors:  B Roux; C T Walsh
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1992-08-04       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Implementation of the CHARMM Force Field in GROMACS: Analysis of Protein Stability Effects from Correction Maps, Virtual Interaction Sites, and Water Models.

Authors:  Pär Bjelkmar; Per Larsson; Michel A Cuendet; Berk Hess; Erik Lindahl
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Graphical analysis of pH-dependent properties of proteins predicted using PROPKA.

Authors:  Michał Rostkowski; Mats H M Olsson; Chresten R Søndergaard; Jan H Jensen
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2011-01-26
View more
  54 in total

1.  Dynamic Coupling and Allosteric Networks in the α Subunit of Heterotrimeric G Proteins.

Authors:  Xin-Qiu Yao; Rabia U Malik; Nicholas W Griggs; Lars Skjærven; John R Traynor; Sivaraj Sivaramakrishnan; Barry J Grant
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Protein Allostery and Conformational Dynamics.

Authors:  Jingjing Guo; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Local packing modulates diversity of iron pathways and cooperative behavior in eukaryotic and prokaryotic ferritins.

Authors:  Anatoly M Ruvinsky; Ilya A Vakser; Mario Rivera
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Analysis of allosteric communication in a multienzyme complex by ancestral sequence reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael Schupfner; Kristina Straub; Florian Busch; Rainer Merkl; Reinhard Sterner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Rapid Characterization of Allosteric Networks with Ensemble Normal Mode Analysis.

Authors:  Xin-Qiu Yao; Lars Skjærven; Barry J Grant
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  MDN: A Web Portal for Network Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Andre A S T Ribeiro; Vanessa Ortiz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Eigenvector centrality for characterization of protein allosteric pathways.

Authors:  Christian F A Negre; Uriel N Morzan; Heidi P Hendrickson; Rhitankar Pal; George P Lisi; J Patrick Loria; Ivan Rivalta; Junming Ho; Victor S Batista
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Detecting Allosteric Networks Using Molecular Dynamics Simulation.

Authors:  S Bowerman; J Wereszczynski
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  Solution NMR and computational methods for understanding protein allostery.

Authors:  Gregory Manley; Ivan Rivalta; J Patrick Loria
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Mapping Mechanical Force Propagation through Biomolecular Complexes.

Authors:  Constantin Schoeler; Rafael C Bernardi; Klara H Malinowska; Ellis Durner; Wolfgang Ott; Edward A Bayer; Klaus Schulten; Michael A Nash; Hermann E Gaub
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 11.189

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.