Literature DB >> 15453222

Finite element analysis of an osseointegrated stepped screw dental implant.

J P Geng1, D W Xu, K B C Tan, G R Liu.   

Abstract

An osseointegrated stepped screw dental implant was evaluated using 2-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA). The implant was modeled in a cross section of the posterior human mandible digitized from a computed tomography (CT) generated patient data set. A 15-mm regular platform (RP) Branemark implant with equivalent length and neck diameter was used as a control. The study was performed under a number of clinically relevant parameters: loading at the top of the transmucosal abutment in vertical, horizontal, and 45 degrees oblique 3 orientations. Elastic moduli of the mandible varied from a normal cortical bone level (13.4 GPa) to a trabecular bone level (1.37 GPa). The study indicated that an oblique load and elastic moduli of the cortical bone are important parameters to the implant design optimization. Compared with the cylindrical screw implant, the maximum von Mises stress of the stepped screw implant model was 17.9% lower in the trabecular bone-implant area. The study also showed that the stepped screw implant is suitable for the cortical bone modulus from 10 to 13.4 GPa, which is not necessarily as strict as the Branemark implant, for which a minimum 13.4 GPa cortical bone modulus is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15453222     DOI: 10.1563/0654.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  8 in total

1.  3D finite element analysis to detect stress distribution: spiral family implants.

Authors:  Matteo Danza; Ilaria Zollino; Luigi Paracchini; Guidi Riccardo; Stefano Fanali; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2010-04-24

2.  Three dimensional finite element analysis to detect stress distribution in spiral implants and surrounding bone.

Authors:  Matteo Danza; Annalisa Palmieri; Francesca Farinella; Giorgio Brunelli; Francesco Carinci; Ambra Girardi; Giuseppe Spinelli
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2009

Review 3.  Current trends in dental implants.

Authors:  Laura Gaviria; John Paul Salcido; Teja Guda; Joo L Ong
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-04-28

4.  Biomechanical Behavior of Bioactive Material in Dental Implant: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Vathsala Patil; Nithesh Naik; Srikanth Gadicherla; Komal Smriti; Adithya Raju; Udit Rathee
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2020-05-07

5.  Finite element evaluation to compare stress pattern in bone surrounding implant with carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone and commercially pure titanium implants.

Authors:  Syeda Amtul Haseeb; Vinaya K C; Neha Vijaykumar; Anju Sree Durga B; Anju S Kumar; Sruthi M K
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-07-15

6.  The influence of thread geometry on biomechanical load transfer to bone: A finite element analysis comparing two implant thread designs.

Authors:  Manisha G Herekar; Viraj N Patil; Shahnawaz S Mulani; Megha Sethi; Omkar Padhye
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-07

7.  Numerical study of effect of elastomeric stress absorbers on stress reduction in bone-dental implant interface.

Authors:  Ghalem Mehdi; Abderrahmane Belarbi; Bensmaine Mansouri; Zitouni Azari
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  New dental implant selection criterion based on implant design.

Authors:  Mohamed I El-Anwar; Mohamed M El-Zawahry; Eman M Ibraheem; Mohammad Zakaria Nassani; Hisham ElGabry
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.