Literature DB >> 23139508

Osseotite implants inserted into fresh frozen bone grafts.

Maurizio Franco1, Alessandro Viscione, Leone Rigo, Riccardo Guidi, Giorgio Brunelli, Anna Avantaggiato, Francesco Carinci.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, several investigators have reported that double etched implants have achieved excellent results. However, no report regarding double etched implants inserted into fresh frozen bone is available. AIMS: We planned to perform a retrospective study on double etched implants inserted into fresh frozen bone grafts. SETTING AND
DESIGN: 28 patients (17 females and 11 males with a median age of 52 years) were operated on and 114 double etched implants inserted. Implant diameter and length ranged from 3.25 to 5.0 mm and from 10.0 to 15 mm, respectively. Implants were inserted to replace 14 incisors, 5 cuspids, 47 premolars and 48 molars.
RESULTS: Since only 4 out of 114 implants were lost (i.e. Survival Rate SVR = 96.5%) and no statistical differences were detected among the studied variables. The type of prosthetic restoration (i.e. fixed prostheses) correlated with a statistically significant lower delta Implant Abutment Junction (i.e. reduced crestal bone loss) and thus a better clinical outcome.
CONCLUSION: Double etched implants inserted into fresh frozen bone had a high survival and success rate similar to those reported in previous studies of two-stage procedures in non-grafted bone, although a higher marginal bone loss has to be expected when removable prosthetic restorations are used.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allograft; Double etched; Homograft; Iliac crest; Implant

Year:  2009        PMID: 23139508      PMCID: PMC3454234          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-009-0050-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  19 in total

Review 1.  Bone banking. Update on methods and materials.

Authors:  W W Tomford; H J Mankin
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  A multicenter prospective evaluation of 2-months loaded Osseotite implants placed in the posterior jaws: 3-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Tiziano Testori; Massimo Del Fabbro; Sylvan Feldman; Gianpaolo Vincenzi; Daniel Sullivan; Renato Rossi; Eduardo Anitua; Francesca Bianchi; Luca Francetti; Roberto L Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  A prospective multicenter evaluation of 1,583 3i implants: 1- to 5-year data.

Authors:  Mithridade Davarpanah; Henry Martinez; Daniel Etienne; Ion Zabalegui; Paul Mattout; Fréderic Chiche; Jean-François Michel
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Retrospective clinical study of Osseotite implants: zero- to 5-year results.

Authors:  Giuliano Garlini; Claudio Bianchi; Valeria Chierichetti; Davide Sigurtà; Carlo Maiorana; Franco Santoro
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: four-year interim report.

Authors:  T Testori; L Wiseman; S Woolfe; S S Porter
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Bone-implant interface structures after nontapping and tapping insertion of screw-type titanium alloy endosseous implants.

Authors:  K Satomi; Y Akagawa; H Nikai; H Tsuru
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  The reliability of pocket probing around screw-type implants.

Authors:  M Quirynen; D van Steenberghe; R Jacobs; A Schotte; P Darius
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1991 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 8.  Banked bone.

Authors:  C K Hardin
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies.

Authors:  A Wennerberg; T Albrektsson; B Andersson; J J Krol
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 10.  Critical review of immediate implant loading.

Authors:  Ricardo Gapski; Hom-Lay Wang; Paulo Mascarenhas; Niklaus P Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.977

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.