Literature DB >> 11324207

A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: four-year interim report.

T Testori1, L Wiseman, S Woolfe, S S Porter.   

Abstract

This article reports the 4-year interim results of a multicenter study evaluating the clinical performance of the Osseotite dental implant. At 4 study centers, 485 Osseotite implants were consecutively placed in 181 patients (219 were placed in the mandible and 266 in the maxilla). A total of 355 implants were placed in posterior regions. Short implants (10 mm or less) represented 31.5% (n = 153) of all implants placed in this study. Patients were restored with 210 restorations, distributed as 123 short-span prostheses, 58 single-tooth replacements, 28 long-span prostheses, and 1 maxillary overdenture. At this 4-year interim evaluation, the mean time from implant placement to the most recent evaluation was 52.6 +/- 3.0 months, with a mean loading time of 43.3 +/- 3.8 months. Of the 485 implants placed, there have been 6 failures. All implant failures occurred prior to loading and were categorized as early implant failures. Five of the 6 failures occurred in the maxilla. Only one of the 153 short implants failed to integrate. Baseline radiographs were obtained at prosthesis connection. Radiographic analysis 1 year post-restoration showed a mean bone loss of 0.09 +/- 0.7 mm. From baseline to the end of the second year of function, an overall mean bone loss of 0.13 +/- 0.8 mm was recorded, indicating no additional bone was lost after the first year of implant function. At 4 years, the cumulative implant success rate for all implants placed in this study was 98.7%, with a 99.4% success rate in the posterior mandible and 98.4% success rate in the posterior maxilla. Results of this 4-year interim analysis indicate that this implant achieved a high success rate in posterior regions and that all failures with this implant in this patient population occurred prior to implant loading. When the clinical success of implants 10 mm or shorter was compared to that of implants greater than 10 mm in length, the shorter implants in this study performed similarly to longer implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11324207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  13 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of anodized surface implants submitted to a counter torque of 25 ncm after 60 days of osseointegration: study in humans.

Authors:  Rafael Manfro; Marcelo Carlos Bortoluzzi; Vinícius Fabris; Carlos Nelson Elias; Vera Cavalcanti de Araújo
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-09-13

2.  Predicting clustered dental implant survival using frailty methods.

Authors:  S-K Chuang; T Cai
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Formation mechanism of biomedical apatite coatings on porous titania layer.

Authors:  Ping Huang; Kewei Xu; Yong Han
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Posterior partially edentulous jaws, planning a rehabilitation with dental implants.

Authors:  Douglas R Monteiro; Emily V F Silva; Eduardo P Pellizzer; Osvaldo Magro Filho; Marcelo C Goiato
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Osseotite implants inserted into fresh frozen bone grafts.

Authors:  Maurizio Franco; Alessandro Viscione; Leone Rigo; Riccardo Guidi; Giorgio Brunelli; Anna Avantaggiato; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2009-11-21

Review 6.  Dental implant systems.

Authors:  Yoshiki Oshida; Elif B Tuna; Oya Aktören; Koray Gençay
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Short implants: A systematic review.

Authors:  I Karthikeyan; Shrikar R Desai; Rika Singh
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-07

8.  Development of implant loading device for animal study about various loading protocol: a pilot study.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yoon; Young-Bum Park; Yuna Cho; Chang-Sung Kim; Seong-Ho Choi; Hong-Seok Moon; Keun-Woo Lee; June-Sung Shim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Marginal bone response of implants with platform switching and non-platform switching abutments in posterior healed sites: a 1-year prospective study.

Authors:  Yun-Chi Wang; Joseph Y K Kan; Kitichai Rungcharassaeng; Phillip Roe; Jaime L Lozada
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Assessing double Acid-etched implants submitted to orthodontic forces and used as prosthetic anchorages in partially edentulous patients.

Authors:  Rugani de Cravero Marta; Ibañez Juan Carlos
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2008-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.