Lyndon G Amorin-Woods1, Randy W Beck1, Gregory F Parkin-Smith2, James Lougheed3, Alexandra P Bremner4. 1. Senior Clinical Supervisor, School of Health Professions [Discipline of Chiropractic], Murdoch University, Enrolled student, Master of Public Health, School of Population Health Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences The University of Western Australia, Email: L.Woods@murdoch.edu.au , Postal Address: Murdoch University, South Street Campus, 90 South Street, MURDOCH Western Australia 6150, Telephone: +61 8-93601202. 2. Registrar in Emergency Medicine, Registered Medical Practitioner, Rockingham General Hospital; Registered Chiropractor. 3. Senior Research Assistant, Institute of Functional Neuroscience, PERTH, Australia. 4. Associate Professor, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Western Australia PERTH, Australia Email: Alexandra.Bremner@uwa.edu.au.
Abstract
AIM: To determine adherence to clinical practice guidelines in the medical, physiotherapy and chiropractic professions for acute and subacute mechanical low back pain through best-evidence synthesis of the healthcare literature. METHODS: A structured best-evidence synthesis of the relevant literature through a literature search of relevant databases for peer-reviewed papers on adherence to clinical practice guidelines from 1995 to 2013. Inclusion of papers was based on selection criteria and appraisal by two reviewers who independently applied a modified Downs & Black appraisal tool. The appraised papers were summarized in tabular form and analysed by the authors. RESULTS: The literature search retrieved 23 potentially relevant papers that were evaluated for methodological quality, of which 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. The main finding was that no profession in the study consistently attained an overall high concordance rating. Of the three professions examined, 73% of chiropractors adhered to current clinical practice guidelines, followed by physiotherapists (62%) and then medical practitioners (52%). CONCLUSIONS: This review showed that quality papers in this area of research are very limited. Notwithstanding, chiropractors appear to adhere to clinical practice guidelines more so than physiotherapists and medical practitioners, although there is scope for improvement across all three professions.
AIM: To determine adherence to clinical practice guidelines in the medical, physiotherapy and chiropractic professions for acute and subacute mechanical low back pain through best-evidence synthesis of the healthcare literature. METHODS: A structured best-evidence synthesis of the relevant literature through a literature search of relevant databases for peer-reviewed papers on adherence to clinical practice guidelines from 1995 to 2013. Inclusion of papers was based on selection criteria and appraisal by two reviewers who independently applied a modified Downs & Black appraisal tool. The appraised papers were summarized in tabular form and analysed by the authors. RESULTS: The literature search retrieved 23 potentially relevant papers that were evaluated for methodological quality, of which 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. The main finding was that no profession in the study consistently attained an overall high concordance rating. Of the three professions examined, 73% of chiropractors adhered to current clinical practice guidelines, followed by physiotherapists (62%) and then medical practitioners (52%). CONCLUSIONS: This review showed that quality papers in this area of research are very limited. Notwithstanding, chiropractors appear to adhere to clinical practice guidelines more so than physiotherapists and medical practitioners, although there is scope for improvement across all three professions.
Entities:
Keywords:
chiropractic; evidence based guidelines; low back pain; medicine; physiotherapy
Authors: Gregory F Parkin-Smith; Ian J Norman; Emma Briggs; Elizabeth Angier; Timothy G Wood; James W Brantingham Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Daniel Cherkin; Francisco M Kovacs; Peter Croft; Jeffrey Borkan; Nadine E Foster; Birgitta Oberg; Gerard Urrútia; Javier Zamora Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2009-02-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Brook I Martin; Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Judith A Turner; Bryan A Comstock; William Hollingworth; Sean D Sullivan Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-02-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: John D Childs; Julie M Whitman; Phillip S Sizer; Maria L Pugia; Timothy W Flynn; Anthony Delitto Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2005-06-17 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: André E Bussières; Fadi Al Zoubi; Kent Stuber; Simon D French; Jill Boruff; John Corrigan; Aliki Thomas Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 3.659
Authors: Gregory F Parkin-Smith; Lyndon G Amorin-Woods; Stephanie J Davies; Barrett E Losco; Jon Adams Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 3.133