Literature DB >> 23138752

Clinical application of massively parallel sequencing-based prenatal noninvasive fetal trisomy test for trisomies 21 and 18 in 11,105 pregnancies with mixed risk factors.

Shan Dan1, Wei Wang, Jinghui Ren, Yali Li, Hua Hu, Zhengfeng Xu, Tze Kin Lau, Jianhong Xie, Weihua Zhao, Hefeng Huang, Jiansheng Xie, Luming Sun, Xiaohong Zhang, Weipeng Wang, Shixiu Liao, Rong Qiang, Jiangxia Cao, Qiufang Zhang, Yulin Zhou, Haiyan Zhu, Mei Zhong, Yi Guo, Linhua Lin, Zhiying Gao, Hong Yao, Hongyun Zhang, Lijian Zhao, Fuman Jiang, Fang Chen, Hui Jiang, Songgang Li, Yingrui Li, Jun Wang, Jian Wang, Tao Duan, Yue Su, Xiuqing Zhang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the performance of massively parallel sequencing (MPS) based prenatal noninvasive fetal trisomy test based on cell-free DNA sequencing from maternal plasma in a routine clinical setting in China.
METHOD: The MPS-based test was offered as a prenatal screening test for trisomies 21 and 18 to pregnant women in 49 medical centers over 2 years. A total of 11,263 participants were recruited and the MPS-based test was performed in 11,105 pregnancies. Fetal outcome data were obtained after the expected date of confinement.
RESULTS: One hundred ninety cases were classified as positive, including 143 cases of trisomy 21 and 47 cases of trisomy 18. With the karyotyping results and the feedback of fetal outcome data, we observed one false positive case of trisomy 21, one false positive case of trisomy 18 and no false negative cases, indicating 100% sensitivity and 99.96% specificity for the detection of trisomies 21 and 18.
CONCLUSION: Our large-scale multicenter study proved that the MPS-based test is of high sensitivity and specificity in detecting fetal trisomies 21 and 18. The introduction of this screening test into a routine clinical setting could avoid about 98% of invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23138752     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  46 in total

1.  Noninvasive prenatal testing using a novel analysis pipeline to screen for all autosomal fetal aneuploidies improves pregnancy management.

Authors:  Baran Bayindir; Luc Dehaspe; Nathalie Brison; Paul Brady; Simon Ardui; Molka Kammoun; Lars Van der Veken; Klaske Lichtenbelt; Kris Van den Bogaert; Jeroen Van Houdt; Hilde Peeters; Hilde Van Esch; Thomy de Ravel; Eric Legius; Koen Devriendt; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Next-generation molecular diagnosis: single-cell sequencing from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Wanjun Zhu; Xiao-Yan Zhang; Sadie L Marjani; Jialing Zhang; Wengeng Zhang; Shixiu Wu; Xinghua Pan
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Maternal-fetal cellular trafficking: clinical implications and consequences.

Authors:  Cerine Jeanty; S Christopher Derderian; Tippi C Mackenzie
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.856

4.  China's bid to be a DNA superpower.

Authors:  David Cyranoski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

6.  The Integration of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening into the Existing Prenatal Paradigm: a Survey of Current Genetic Counseling Practice.

Authors:  Emily Suskin; Laura Hercher; Kathleen Erskine Aaron; Komal Bajaj
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies by semiconductor sequencing.

Authors:  Can Liao; Ai-hua Yin; Chun-fang Peng; Fang Fu; Jie-xia Yang; Ru Li; Yang-yi Chen; Dong-hong Luo; Yong-ling Zhang; Yan-mei Ou; Jian Li; Jing Wu; Ming-qin Mai; Rui Hou; Frances Wu; Hongrong Luo; Dong-zhi Li; Hai-liang Liu; Xiao-zhuang Zhang; Kang Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Integration of noninvasive DNA testing for aneuploidy into prenatal care: what has happened since the rubber met the road?

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi; Louise Wilkins-Haug
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Biological explanations for discordant noninvasive prenatal test results: Preliminary data and lessons learned.

Authors:  Louise Wilkins-Haug; Chengsheng Zhang; Eliza Cerveira; Mallory Ryan; Adam Mil-Homens; Qihui Zhu; Honey Reddi; Charles Lee; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  [Noninvasive prenatal screening for twin pregnancy: an analysis of 2057 cases].

Authors:  Yixuan Yin; Hui Zhu; Yeqing Qian; Jinglei Jin; Jin Mei; Minyue Dong
Journal:  Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.