Qing Li1, Yong Fan, Xiaofang Sun, Yanhong Yu. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong, China.
Abstract
The ectopic expression of transcription factors for reprogramming human somatic cells to a pluripotent state represents a valuable resource for the development of in vitro-based models for human disease and has great potential in regenerative therapies. However, the majority of studies have used skin fibroblasts to generate induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) that typically require the enforced expression of several transcription factors, thereby posing a mutagenesis risk by the insertion of viral transgenes. To reduce this risk, iPSCs have been generated with OCT4 and KLF4 from human neural stem cells that endogenously express the remaining reprogramming factors. However, human neural stem cells are rare and difficult to obtain. Here, we show that iPSCs can be generated from human amniotic fluid cells (hAFCs) with two transcription factors: OCT4 and KLF4. Furthermore, iPSCs can be readily derived from hAFCs in a feeder-free conditions, thereby eliminating the potential variability caused by using feeder cells. Our results indicate that hAFCs represent an accessible source of cells that can be reprogrammed into pluripotent stem cells with two Yamanaka factors. Therefore, hAFCs may become a preferred cell type in the future for safe reprogramming without any exogenous genetic material.
The ectopic expression of transcription factors for reprogramming human somatic cells to a pluripotent state represents a valuable resource for the development of in vitro-based models for human disease and has great potential in regenerative therapies. However, the majority of studies have used skin fibroblasts to generate induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) that typically require the enforced expression of several transcription factors, thereby posing a mutagenesis risk by the insertion of viral transgenes. To reduce this risk, iPSCs have been generated with OCT4 and KLF4 from human neural stem cells that endogenously express the remaining reprogramming factors. However, human neural stem cells are rare and difficult to obtain. Here, we show that iPSCs can be generated from human amniotic fluid cells (hAFCs) with two transcription factors: OCT4 and KLF4. Furthermore, iPSCs can be readily derived from hAFCs in a feeder-free conditions, thereby eliminating the potential variability caused by using feeder cells. Our results indicate that hAFCs represent an accessible source of cells that can be reprogrammed into pluripotent stem cells with two Yamanaka factors. Therefore, hAFCs may become a preferred cell type in the future for safe reprogramming without any exogenous genetic material.
The generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from differentiated somatic cells by the
exogenous expression of several key transcription factors has provided great promise to the
generation of patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) for disease modeling,
drug screening and cell therapy applications. IPSCs are usually obtained from fibroblasts
after infection with viral constructs carrying the four transcription factors OCT4, SOX2, KLF4
and c-MYC [1]. However, one of the factors, c-MYC, is
known as a proto-oncogene, and its reactivation could give rise to transgene-derived tumors
[2]. Several studies have successfully produced iPSCs
without using c-MYC and obtained viable chimera mice with reduced tumorigenicity [3,4,5]. Recently, Hester et al. [6] demonstrated that human fetal neural stem cells, which
endogenously express SOX2 at a high level, can be reprogrammed by either of two factors (OCT4
and KLF4). This is a major advance toward identifying cells that can be reprogrammed more
easily with less manipulation. However, in humans, neural stem cells that can be reprogrammed
with only two factors, OCT4 and KLF4, are rare and difficult to obtain.Human amniotic fluid represents a heterogeneous population that contains cells from the
developing fetus. Various types of fetal cells have been detected in amniotic fluid (AF)
[7]. Approximately 1% of amniotic fluid cells (AFCs)
are categorized as amniotic fluid stem cells [8]. The
remaining cells in the AF are terminally differentiated cells (approximately 99%) that have
mainly been desquamated from the fetal skin. Recently, our group and other researchers
reported that human amniotic fluid cells (hAFCs) could be reprogrammed more rapidly and
efficiently than skin fibroblast cells using the four Yamanaka factors [5, 9, 10]. The hAFCs may therefore possess a different genetic and epigenetic landscape
that is more ideal for reprogramming than that of fibroblast cells. Here, we succeeded in
reprograming hAFCs into iPSCs via the ectopic expression of OCT4 and KLF4. The hAFCs yielded
two-factor iPSCs that fulfill all pluripotency criteria, as determined by their pluripotency
gene expression, their capacity to differentiate into various somatic cell types in
vitro and in vivo and their direct differentiation into beating
cardiomyocytes after induction and differentiation. Furthermore, the two-factor iPSCs can be
readily derived on feeder-free surfaces using Matrigel-coated tissue culture dishes, thereby
reducing the variability of the reprogramming processes associated with mouse feeder cells.
Our results indicate that hAFCs represent an accessible source of cells that can be
reprogrammed into iPSCs with two Yamanaka factors. Therefore, hAFCs may become a preferred
cell type in the future for safe reprogramming without any exogenous genetic material.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture
All experiments were approved by the ethical committee of The Third Affiliated Hospital
of Guangzhou Medical College. Human amniotic fluid was obtained by ultrasound-guided
amniocentesis performed on pregnant women for routine prenatal diagnosis purposes at
gestational ages ranging from the 18th to 22nd weeks. HAFCs were obtained by the
centrifugation of 10 to 20 ml of AF in a centrifuge tube at 1,000 rpm for 5 min. The
supernatant was removed, and the cells were resuspended in 2 ml of AmnioMAX™-II
Complete Medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), which was then transferred to 6 cm dishes
with the volume of each made up to 4 ml; these cells were cultured at 37 C under 5%
humidified CO2. Cell clusters emerged at 7 days after seeding. Non-adherent
cells were discarded. The cells were cultured and passaged routinely at 70–80% confluence.
HumanESCs were maintained on mitomycin C-treated mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells
in KnockOut DMEM culture medium supplemented with 20% KnockOut Serum Replacement, 1 mM
nonessential amino acids, 2 mM GlutaMAX, 0.1 mM b-mercaptoethanol, 100 U/ml penicillin,
100 mg/ml streptomycin (all from Invitrogen) and 4 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor
(PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA).
Derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells from amniotic fluid cells
Retroviruses were produced as previously described [1]. Briefly, 293T cells for retrovirus production were maintained in retrovirus
infection medium [DMEM containing 10% FBS (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA), 2 mM L-glutamine, and
1 mM nonessential amino acids (Invitrogen)]. The cells were transfected with the pMX-based
retroviral vectors (a gift from Dr Duanqing Pei of the Guangzhou Institute of Biomedicine
and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences) encoding the human cDNA of OCT4, SOX2, KLF4 and
c-MYC with Lipofectamine LTX & Plus Reagent (Invitrogen) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. To monitor the infection efficiency, a GFP-expressing
plasmid, pMX-GFP, was used as a control. Virus-containing supernatants were collected at
48 h after transfection. For viral transduction, hAFCs were seeded at
1×105/well in a 6-well plate (Costar, Corning, NY, USA), and 6 h later, the
medium was replaced with the virus-containing supernatants (OCT4, SOX2, KLF4 and c-MYC or
OCT4 and KLF4) with 8 µg/ml polybrene (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for infection overnight.
After 24 h, infected hAFCs were replated onto mitomycin C-treated MEF cells with human ESC
culture medium. At 10 to 15 days after the four-factor transductions and 25 to 30 days
after the two-factor transductions, colonies were picked and transferred onto
Matrigel-coated tissue culture dishes (ES qualified; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA)
with mTeSR1 (STEMCELL Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada) in 24-well plates. After
seeding of colonies for 5 to 7d onto the Matrigel-coated dish, the emerging colonies were
passaged using dispase. This passaging was repeated for up to 10 passages. During this
period, ES-like colonies were subjected to analyses of maker gene expression and
pluripotency.
Alkaline phosphatase staining and immunostaining
To detect alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity, iPS colonies were fixed with 90% alcohol
for 2 min, washed three times with Tween-BST solution [phosphate buffersaline (PBS) with
1% bovine serum albumin and 0.2% Tween-20] and then stained with BCIP/NBT (AP substrate
solution, Maxim Biotech, San Francisco, CA, USA) for 30 min. For immunocytochemistry,
cells were fixed with PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature.
After washing with PBS, the cells were treated with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 for
15 min at room temperature and then incubated with PBS containing 5% normal goat serum
(Chemicon, Billerica, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. The primary antibodies
included TRA-1-60 (1:200, Chemicon), NANOG (1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), OCT4
(1:200, Chemicon), α-fetoprotein (AFP) (1:100, Human Germ Layer Marker Kit, Chemicon),
α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) (1:200, Human Germ Layer Marker Kit, Chemicon), and Tuj1
(1:200, Human Germ Layer Marker Kit, Chemicon) and troponin T type 2 cardiac (TnTc)
(1;200, a cardiomyocyte marker, Chemicon). The secondary antibodies Alexa Fluor
488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:500, Invitrogen) and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit IgG (1:500, Invitrogen) were used. Nuclei were stained with
4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI).
Karyotype analysis
For chromosome analysis, iPSCs obtained after every 10 passages were incubated in culture
medium with 0.25 μg/ml colcemid (Gibco, Invitrogen) for 4 h, harvested and incubated in
0.4% sodium citrate and 0.4% chloratum Kaliumat (1:1, v/v) at 37 C for 5 min. The iPSCs
were then fixed in methanol:acetic acid (3:1, v/v) three times. After Giemsa staining, at
least 20 cells were examined in each group for chromosome analysis.
Quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA and cDNA from each sample were prepared using an RNAeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen)
and QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen), respectively, according to the
manufacturers' instructions. Quantitative RT-PCR used to measure gene expression levels
was performed using an Applied Biosystems 7500 instrument with SYBR Premix Ex
TaqTM#II (TaKaRa, Otsu, Shiga, Japan). The primer sequences used for
quantitative RT-PCR amplification were GACAGGGGGAGGGGAGGAGCTAGG, forward, and
CTTCCCTCCAACCAGTTGCCCCAAAC, reverse, for OCT4; CAGCCCCGATTCTTCCACCAGTCC, forward, and
CGGAAGATTCCCAGTCGGGTTCACC, reverse, for NANOG; CCCCAGGGCCCCATTTTGGTACC, forward, and
TTATCGTCGACCACTGTGCTGCTG reverse, for tg-OCT4: GGCACCCCTGGCATGGCTCTTGGCTC, forward, and
TTATCGTCGACCACTGTGCTGCTG, reverse, for tg-SOX2;ACGATCGTGGCCCCGGAAAAGGACC, forward, and TTATCGTCGACCACTGTGCTGCTG, reverse, for tg-KLF4;
CAACCGAAAATGCACCAGCCCCAG forward, and TTATCGTCGACCACTGTGCTGCTG, reverse, for tg-c-MYC.
In vitro differentiation
For embryoid body (EB) formation, human iPS cells were harvested by treating them with 1
mg/ml dispase. The cell clumps were transferred to a non-adherent bacteriological dish in
DMEM/F12 containing 15% FBS, 1 mM nonessential amino acids, 10–4 M
β-mercaptoethanol, 2 mM L-Glutamax and 50 μg/ml penicillin/streptomycin. The medium was
changed every other day. After 7 days, EBs were transferred to a gelatin-coated plate
(Costar, Corning, Tewksbury, MA, USA) and cultured in the same medium for an additional 7
days. For cardiomyocyte differentiation, the medium was supplemented with 100 ng/ml human
recombinant activin A (R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) for 24 h, followed by 10
ng/ml human recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4, R&D Systems) for 4 days.
The medium was changed every other day.
In vivo differentiation
The iPSC colonies from passages 10 or beyond were treated with a 1 mg/ml dispase solution
for 10–15 min and then dispensed into 300–400 small iPS colony suspensions. The colonies
were collected and subcutaneously injected into the inguinal grooves of 6-week-old male
severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice (Vital River Laboratories, Beijing, China).
Eight weeks later, the resultant tumors were removed, fixed for 4–8 h in 4%
paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. After staining with hematoxylin and eosin, the
sections were examined under a light microscope for the presence of tissues derived from
the three germ layers.
Microarray analysis
Affymetrix U133 2.0 GeneChips were used for this study. All experiments were performed
and analyzed at CapitalBio (Beijing, China). Three biological repeat samples from human
AFCs, humanES (FY-hES-1)[11],
hAFC-iPS4f-1(P15) and hAFC-iPS2f-1 (P21) cells were collected and
analyzed as described in the Affymetrix Technical Manual.
Results
Generation of iPSCs from hAFCs using two or four factors
When the hAFCs were passaged 5 times in vitro, we compared expression
levels of several marker genes among humanES cells, hAFCs and human fetal fibroblast
cells (hFFCs). Data from quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) revealed strong expression of
C-MYC and KLF4 in hAFCs. Trace amounts of NANOG were detected, being similar in hAFCs and
hFFCs, but much lower than that in humanES cells (Fig.
1).
Fig. 1.
Quantitative RT-PCR for expression of OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, KLF4 and c-MYC in human
ES cells (FY-hES-1), hAFC and hFFC. Values are shown as means + SD of results from
three independent experiments.
Quantitative RT-PCR for expression of OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, KLF4 and c-MYC in humanES cells (FY-hES-1), hAFC and hFFC. Values are shown as means + SD of results from
three independent experiments.The human reprogramming factors OCT4, KLF4, SOX2 and c-MYC or factors OCT4 and KLF4 were
expressed in hAFCs as previously described. To monitor the infection efficiency, a
GFP-expressing plasmid, pMX-GFP, was used as a control. The infection efficiency reached
approximately 80% as determined by the GFP expression. Twenty-four hours after infection,
virus-infected hAFCs were plated onto mitomycin C-treated MEF cells. One day later, the
medium was changed to humanES cell culture medium. The typical humanES-like colonies
appeared 5 days after replating and could be picked on day 9 after four-factor infection.
The typical humanES-like colonies appeared 20 days after replating and could be picked on
day 25 after two-factor infection. On day 21 after infection, AP staining was performed.
We counted the number of humanES-like colonies and those that were positive for AP
staining (Fig. 2A). The efficiency of the induction of pluripotency was approximately 0.46% in hAFCs
infected with four factors and approximately 0.01% in hAFCs infected with two factors
(data not shown). The efficiencies of reprogramming human dermal and neonatal foreskin
fibroblasts to iPS cells utilizing OCT4, KLF4, SOX2 and c-MYC have been shown to range
between 0.01% and 0.02% [1, 3, 12], which is quite similar to
our reprogramming efficiencies of hAFCs with OCT4 and KLF4. Eight colonies from 1 ×
105 hAFCs infected with four factors were picked and transferred onto
Matrigel for further expansion, and 5 iPS cell lines (named hAFC-iPS4f-1, 2, 3,
4 and 5) were established. Three colonies from 1 × 105 hAFCs infected with two
factors were picked and transferred onto Matrigel for further expansion, and two iPSC
lines (named hAFC-iPS2f-1 and 2) were established. HAFC-iPS4f-1 and
hAFC-iPS2f-1 (Fig. 2B, C) were
passaged more than 20 times. The two iPSC lines showed normal karyotypes (46XX) (Fig. 2D).
Fig. 2.
Characterization of iPSCs from hAFCs using two or four factors. A:
hAFC-iPS2f cells were stained for alkaline phosphatase (AP). B: A
typical hAFC-iPS4f cell colony growing on a feeder-free Matrigel surface.
C: A typical hAFC-iPS2f cell colony growing on a feeder-free Matrigel
surface. D: The karyotype of hAFC-iPS2f cells is 46XX. E: Quantitative
RT-PCR results showing that the endogenous expression levels of OCT4 and NANOG in
hAFC-iPS2f and hAFC-iPS4f cells are similar to those in hES
cells. F: Immunostaining of hAFC-iPS2f cells and hAFC-iPS4f
cells. hAFC-iPS2f cells and hAFC-iPS4f cells were positive for
the pluripotency genes OCT4 and NANOG, and they expressed the cell surface marker
TRA-1-60 (scale bars, 100 μm).
Characterization of iPSCs from hAFCs using two or four factors. A:
hAFC-iPS2f cells were stained for alkaline phosphatase (AP). B: A
typical hAFC-iPS4f cell colony growing on a feeder-free Matrigel surface.
C: A typical hAFC-iPS2f cell colony growing on a feeder-free Matrigel
surface. D: The karyotype of hAFC-iPS2f cells is 46XX. E: Quantitative
RT-PCR results showing that the endogenous expression levels of OCT4 and NANOG in
hAFC-iPS2f and hAFC-iPS4f cells are similar to those in hES
cells. F: Immunostaining of hAFC-iPS2f cells and hAFC-iPS4f
cells. hAFC-iPS2f cells and hAFC-iPS4f cells were positive for
the pluripotency genes OCT4 and NANOG, and they expressed the cell surface marker
TRA-1-60 (scale bars, 100 μm).
3.2 hAFC-iPS cells express hES markers
To validate the characteristics of the hAFC-iPS2f and hAFC-iPS4f
cells, the expression of undifferentiated ES marker genes was tested by quantitative
RT-PCR and immunocytochemical analysis. Quantitative RT-PCR results revealed that the
endogenous expression levels of OCT4 and NANOG were comparable to those in hES cells
(Fig. 2E). The expression of OCT4, NANOG and
the humanES cell-specific surface marker TRA-1-60 was detected in hAFC-iPS2f
and hAFC-iPS4f cells. As shown in Fig.
2F, all selected colonies were positive for OCT4, NANOG and TRA-1-60.
Quantitative RT-PCR using primers specific for retroviral transcripts confirmed efficient
silencing of all the four retroviruses (Fig.
3).
Fig. 3.
Quantitative RT-PCR for expression of retroviral transgenes in hAFC-iPS2f-1,
hAFC-iPS4f-1, hAFC and hAFC 6 days after transduction with the four retroviruses
(hAFC/4f-6d). Shown are the averages and standard deviations of three independent
experiments. The value of hAFC/4f-6d was set to 1 in each experiment.
Quantitative RT-PCR for expression of retroviral transgenes in hAFC-iPS2f-1,
hAFC-iPS4f-1, hAFC and hAFC 6 days after transduction with the four retroviruses
(hAFC/4f-6d). Shown are the averages and standard deviations of three independent
experiments. The value of hAFC/4f-6d was set to 1 in each experiment.
In vitro differentiation of hAFC-iPS cells
Floating cultivation of EBs was used to determine the differentiation ability of hAFC-iPS
cells in vitro. After 7 days in suspension culture, hAFC-iPS2f
-1 cells formed EBs, which were transferred onto gelatin-coated plates and cultured for an
additional 7 days. Immunocytochemistry results further showed that the differentiated
cells were positive for α-fetoprotein (AFP, endoderm), α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA,
mesoderm) and Tuj1 (ectoderm) (Fig. 4 A–I). We then examined the directed cardiac differentiation of hAF-iPS2f -1
cells using a recently reported protocol, which utilizes activin A and bone morphogenetic
protein (BMP) 4 [13]. Twelve days after the
induction of differentiation, clumps of cells started beating (Suppl Movie S1
: online only). Immunocytochemistry results further showed that these cells expressed cardiomyocyte
markers, such as troponin T type 2 cardiac (TnTc) (Fig.
4 J–L). These data demonstrated that hAFC-iPS cells possess the potential to
differentiate into all three germ layers in vitro.
Fig. 4.
In vitro differentiation of hAFC-iPS2f cells. iPSCs
were first cultured in a floating culture for 7 days and were then attached to
gelatin-coated dishes for an additional 7 days for differentiation.
Immunocytochemistry results show differentiated hAFC-iPS2f cells
expressing (A) Tuj1, (D) α-smooth muscle actin and (G) α-fetoprotein. (J)
Phase-contrast image of iPSCs differentiated into cardiomyocytes. (L)
Immunocytochemical analysis of cardiomyocyte marker TnTc (scale bars, 100 µm).
In vitro differentiation of hAFC-iPS2f cells. iPSCs
were first cultured in a floating culture for 7 days and were then attached to
gelatin-coated dishes for an additional 7 days for differentiation.
Immunocytochemistry results show differentiated hAFC-iPS2f cells
expressing (A) Tuj1, (D) α-smooth muscle actin and (G) α-fetoprotein. (J)
Phase-contrast image of iPSCs differentiated into cardiomyocytes. (L)
Immunocytochemical analysis of cardiomyocyte marker TnTc (scale bars, 100 µm).
In vivo differentiation of hAFC-iPS cells
To demonstrate the pluripotency of hAFC-iPS cells in vivo,
hAFC-iPS2f -1 cells were subcutaneously injected into immunodeficient (SCID)
mice. Eight weeks after injection, we observed teratoma formation. Histological
examinations showed that the teratomas contained various tissues comprising all three germ
layers, such as neural cells (ectoderm), cartilaginous tissue (mesoderm) and glandular
tissue (endoderm) (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.
In vivo differentiation of hAFC-iPS2f cells. Teratomas
that formed 8 weeks after the injection of iPSCs contained tissues from all three
types of germ layers, including (A) neural cells (ectoderm), (B) cartilaginous
tissue (mesoderm) and (C) glandular tissue (endoderm) (scale bars, 100 µm).
In vivo differentiation of hAFC-iPS2f cells. Teratomas
that formed 8 weeks after the injection of iPSCs contained tissues from all three
types of germ layers, including (A) neural cells (ectoderm), (B) cartilaginous
tissue (mesoderm) and (C) glandular tissue (endoderm) (scale bars, 100 µm).
Gene expression of hAFC-iPS cells
To characterize the hAFC-iPS cells at the global gene expression level, we performed
microarray analysis for the following cell lines: hAFCS, FY-hES-1, hAFC-iPS2f-1
and hAFC-iPS4f-1. Global gene expression patterns indicated that
hAFC-iPS2f-1 and hAFC-iPS4f-1 had a high similarity with FY-hES-1,
with correlation coefficients of 0.9750 and 0.9709, respectively (Fig. 6). In contrast, the hAFC-iPS2f-1 and hAFC-iPS4f-1 cells had
low similarities with parental hAFCs, indicating that the hAFCs were successfully
reprogrammed.
Fig. 6.
Microarray analysis of hAFC-iPS cells. The global gene expression profiles were
compared between hAFC-iPS cells and human ES cells (FY-hES-1) using an Affymetrix
microarray. The correlation coefficient was calculated between the groups.
Microarray analysis of hAFC-iPS cells. The global gene expression profiles were
compared between hAFC-iPS cells and humanES cells (FY-hES-1) using an Affymetrix
microarray. The correlation coefficient was calculated between the groups.
Discussion
In this study, we identified a new source of human cells that can be efficiently
reprogrammed into human iPSCs by the ectopic exposure of only two factors, OCT4 and KLF4.
The mechanism of this two-factor reprogramming is probably largely due to the intrinsic
expression of C-MYC and KLF4 within hAFCs. This is an important step toward the goal of
developing safe and efficient protocols for generating patient-specific iPSCs from
accessible cells for directed cell differentiation and transplantation. Furthermore, we show
that human iPSCs can be readily generated under feeder-free conditions using hAFCs, which
reduces the variability of reprogramming associated with the use of mouse feeder cells.
HAFC-iPS2f and hAFC-iPS4f cells express ES cell markers and genes
associated with pluripotency at similar levels to hES cells and are morphologically
indistinguishable from their hES cell counterparts. Global gene expression patterns are also
similar to hES cell profiles. HAFC-iPS cells can differentiate into cells belonging to all
three germ layer types both in vitro and in vivo and can
also directly differentiate into beating cardiomyocyte after induction and differentiation,
thereby indicating they are true pluripotent cells.Using hAFCs as a potential source of for reprogramming to iPSCs offers multiple advantages.
First, AFCs are routinely harvested in antenatal examinations to enable the early detection
of diseases. In most cases, more cells are obtained than are actually needed, and these
cells are eventually discarded. Because these cells have not aged, they have fewer
environmentally induced mutations, making them genetically more stable. Thus, it is possible
to reprogram these AFCs faster and more easily than other cell types, making hAFC-iPS cells
an interesting complement to ES cells. Second, because the reprogramming process requires
only two factors, the risk of changes due to insertional mutagenesis is minimized.
Furthermore, obviating the requirement for c-MYC reduces the risk of inducing tumorigenicity
[2, 3]. In
addition, because two factors are sufficient for human iPS induction from hAFCs, it may be
possible to substitute one or both of the two factors with small molecules that activate
OCT4 or KLF4 gene expression. For example, several recent reports have demonstrated that
small molecule activators and inhibitors of epigenetic regulation and signaling pathways can
replace the activity of individual reprogramming transcription factors [14, 15, 16, 17]. These
reports suggest that it may be possible to reprogram hAFCs into iPSCs by OCT4 and small
molecule modifiers of epigenetic regulation, further minimizing the undesired effects of
utilizing retroviral vectors. An additional advantage of utilizing hAFCs is that if the
homozygous state of a genetic disease is diagnosed, reprogramming these cells into iPSCs can
begin during the pregnancy immediately after diagnosis to offer early treatment in the
neonatal period.In summary, we demonstrated that hAFCs obtained during prenatal diagnosis can be
reprogrammed into iPSCs by two transcription factors, OCT4 and KLF4, without the use of
additional small molecules. The feeder-free derivation of iPSCs from hAFCs represents a more
clinically applicable method for the derivation of iPSCs compared with other cell types and
should enable the more efficient and rapid generation of disease-specific iPSCs, such as for
β-thalassemia.
Authors: Paolo De Coppi; Georg Bartsch; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Tao Xu; Cesar C Santos; Laura Perin; Gustavo Mostoslavsky; Angéline C Serre; Evan Y Snyder; James J Yoo; Mark E Furth; Shay Soker; Anthony Atala Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2007-01-07 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Elisa Galende; Ioannis Karakikes; Lisa Edelmann; Robert J Desnick; Thomas Kerenyi; Georges Khoueiry; James Lafferty; Joseph T McGinn; Michael Brodman; Valentin Fuster; Roger J Hajjar; Katalin Polgar Journal: Cell Reprogram Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 1.987
Authors: Michael A Laflamme; Kent Y Chen; Anna V Naumova; Veronica Muskheli; James A Fugate; Sarah K Dupras; Hans Reinecke; Chunhui Xu; Mohammad Hassanipour; Shailaja Police; Chris O'Sullivan; Lila Collins; Yinhong Chen; Elina Minami; Edward A Gill; Shuichi Ueno; Chun Yuan; Joseph Gold; Charles E Murry Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2007-08-26 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Mark E Hester; Sungwon Song; Carlos J Miranda; Amy Eagle; Phillip H Schwartz; Brian K Kaspar Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-09-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Enrica Bertin; Martina Piccoli; Chiara Franzin; Andras Nagy; Maria Mileikovsky; Paolo De Coppi; Michela Pozzobon Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Ivana Antonucci; Martina Provenzano; Melissa Rodrigues; Andrea Pantalone; Vincenzo Salini; Patrizia Ballerini; Cesar V Borlongan; Liborio Stuppia Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 5.923