| Literature DB >> 25289067 |
Ding Wang1, Rui Chen2, Xuan Zhong2, Yong Fan2, Weiqiang Lai1, Xiaofang Sun1.
Abstract
The present study aimed to improve the characterization of amniotic fluid cells (AFCs) in order to optimize their use in chromosomal prenatal diagnosis and as seed or stem cells for tissue engineering. The AFCs used in the current study were obtained from three females in their second trimester of pregnancy. The cells were cultured independently and characterized by cell morphology, cell markers, cell cycle distribution and chromosome Giemsa banding in an early- and late-passage. The AFCs remained homogeneous in culture and expressed mesenchymal markers, but not endothelial markers along the culture process. In addition, compared with the early-passage cells, the late-passage cells exhibit an increase in CD105 expression, a decrease in cell division and a delay in the cell cycle, and a number of cells underwent cell cycle arrest. However, the cells retained a normal karyotype. Therefore, the current study characterized AFCs in a clinical culture and confirmed that AFCs are mesenchymal precursors. The results obtained may be useful for the application of AFCs in prenatal diagnosis.Entities:
Keywords: CD105; S-phase arrest; amniotic fluid cells; cell proliferation; long-term culture
Year: 2014 PMID: 25289067 PMCID: PMC4186349 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2014.1959
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1Cell morphology of AFCs in long-term culture reveal a normal karyotype. (A) Endothelial and fibroblast colonies are apparent in the primary culture, with a number of endothelial (white arrow) and fibroblast (black arrow) cells present in the subculture. For the first line figure, bar=50 μm, for the second line figure, bar=25 μm. The first line figure magnification, ×50; the second line figure magnification, ×100. (B) Proliferation curves for passages 1 and 6. *P<0.05 vs. passage 6. (C) AFCs retained a normal karyotype in passage 6. AFC, amniotic fluid cells.
Figure 2Flow cytometric analysis of the AFC subculture. (A) The positive cell percentage of each marker was calculated by flow cytometric analysis. The flow cytometric analysis of AFC1 is shown. (B) Comparison of the positive cell percentages between passages 1 and 6 for each marker. *P<0.05, vs. passage 1. AFC, amniotic fluid cell.
Figure 3Flow cytometry analysis of the (A) AFC2 and (B) AFC3.
Figure 4Cell cycle distribution of the AFC subculture. (A) DNA content analysis using flow cytometry. (B) Cell cycle stage ratios for each measurement. (C) Comparison of the cell cycle stage ratios between passages 1 and 6. AFC, amniotic fluid cell.