Literature DB >> 23135792

Vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis calculated by radiograph and back surface analysis-based methods: correlation between the Raimondi method and rasterstereography.

Massimiliano Mangone1, Paolo Raimondi, Marco Paoloni, Sabina Pellanera, Alessandra Di Michele, Sara Di Renzo, Mariangela Vanadia, Mauro Dimaggio, Massimiliano Murgia, Valter Santilli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present research is to evaluate the relationship between an X-ray-based method (i.e. the Raimondi method) and rasterstereography in the evaluation of vertebral rotation (VR) in a sample of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients.
METHODS: A total of 25 patients (9 males; mean age 14 ± 3 years; mean height 160.7 ± 11.9 cm; mean weight 52.4 ± 10.7 kg) were considered for the present analysis. The mean Cobb angle was 30° ± 9°. The evaluation of VR on radiographs was made using the Raimondi method regolo (Marrapese Editore--Demi S.r.1., Rome). Rasterstereography was performed by means of Formetric 4D(®) (Diers International GmbH, Schlangenbad, Germany). Correlations between rasterstereographic and radiographic measurement of VR were calculated, both for the whole sample and for thoracic and lumbar spinal segments considered separately, as well as for subgroups of patients with a Cobb angle <30° and ≥ 30° using Spearman's correlation coefficient by rank (r (s)).
RESULTS: When applied to the entire spine, measurement of VR by means of the two methods highlighted a significant correlation in the whole group (r = 0.52; p < 0.0001), as well as in the <30° Cobb (r = 0.47; p = 0.0001) and ≥ 30° Cobb (r = 0.42; p < 0.0001) subgroups. A significant correlation was found also when lumbar and thoracic VR were considered as separated groups (r = 0.30, p = 0.024 and r = 0.47, p = 0.002, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Rasterstereographic evaluation of VR shows a good correlation with the Raimondi method, thereby confirming the possibility to use this non-invasive method for deformity assessment in AIS patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23135792      PMCID: PMC3555624          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2564-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Rasterstereographic back shape analysis in idiopathic scoliosis after posterior correction and fusion.

Authors:  Lars Hackenberg; Eberhard Hierholzer; Wolfgang Pötzl; Christian Götze; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Sarah Darby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of axial vertebral rotation.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Timothy R Kuklo; Benjamin K Potter; Teresa M Schroeder; Michael F O'Brien
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Scoliometer and Adam's forward bend test.

Authors:  P Côté; B G Kreitz; J D Cassidy; A K Dzus; J Martel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  In vivo three-dimensional segmental analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Takako Hattori; Hironobu Sakaura; Motoki Iwasaki; Yukitaka Nagamoto; Hideki Yoshikawa; Kazuomi Sugamoto
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. Scoliosis Cohort Study.

Authors:  M M Doody; J E Lonstein; M Stovall; D G Hacker; N Luckyanov; C E Land
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Relationship between clinical contourometric measurements and vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Mislav Cimić; Vladimir Kovac; Iva Smiljanić; Ida Kovac; Adrijana Cimić; Tomislav Smoljanović
Journal:  Coll Antropol       Date:  2009-12

9.  Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity.

Authors:  I A Stokes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Validity and reliability of a computer method to estimate vertebral axial rotation from digital radiographs.

Authors:  Alan P Pinheiro; Michelle C Tanure; Anamaria S Oliveira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  [Radiation-free diagnosis of scoliosis : An overview of the surface and spine topography].

Authors:  M Betsch; M Wild; B Rath; M Tingart; A Schulze; V Quack
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Answer to the Letter to the Editor of J. Padulo concerning: "Vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis calculated by radiograph and back surface analysis-based methods: correlation between the Raimondi method and rasterstereography" by Mangone M, Raimondi P, Paoloni M, Pellanera S, Di Michele A, Di Renzo S, Vanadia M, Dimaggio M, Murgia M, Santilli V (2013) Eur Spine J 22:367-371.

Authors:  M Mangone; M Paoloni
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The validity and reliability of "Spinal Mouse" assessment of spinal curvatures in the frontal plane in pediatric adolescent idiopathic thoraco-lumbar curves.

Authors:  Ayse Livanelioglu; Fatma Kaya; Vugar Nabiyev; Gokhan Demirkiran; Tüzün Fırat
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Reply to the letter to the editor of L. Russo et al. concerning "Relationship between sagittal spinal curves geometry and isokinetic trunk muscle strength in adults" by W. Elsayed, A. Farrag, Q. Muaidi, N. Almulhim (2018) Eur Spine J 27:2014-2022.

Authors:  Walaa Hamdy Elsayed; Ahmed Taha Farrag; Qassim Ibrahim Muaidi; Nora Ahmed Almulhim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Formetric rasterstereography: a new perspective. Reply to Padulo and Ardigó.

Authors:  M Krause; M Amling; F Barvencik
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Formetric rasterstereography: a new perspective.

Authors:  J Padulo; L P Ardigò
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis calculated by radiograph and back surface analysis-based methods: correlation between the Raimondi method and rasterstereography. Eur Spine J;22:2336-2337 : Statistical perspectives part II.

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Luca Paolo Ardigò
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Computerized tomography imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: prone versus supine.

Authors:  Gultekin Sıtkı Cecen; Deniz Gulabi; Aycicek Cecen; İsmail Oltulu; Bulent Guclu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Three-dimensional morphology study of surgical adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patient from encoded geometric models.

Authors:  William Thong; Stefan Parent; James Wu; Carl-Eric Aubin; Hubert Labelle; Samuel Kadoury
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Assessment of the reliability of hand-held surface scanner in the evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Yılmaz Yıldırım; Kadriye Tombak; Sezen Karaşin; İnci Yüksel; Ahmet Hakan Nur; Umut Ozsoy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.