Literature DB >> 14580831

Rasterstereographic back shape analysis in idiopathic scoliosis after posterior correction and fusion.

Lars Hackenberg1, Eberhard Hierholzer, Wolfgang Pötzl, Christian Götze, Ulf Liljenqvist.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of rasterstereographic three-dimensional back surface analysis and reconstruction of the spine in idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior correction and fusion.
DESIGN: Prospective imaging study of 25 patients with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior correction and fusion and were followed for one year.
BACKGROUND: In an earlier study published in this journal rasterstereography has proved to be an accurate imaging modality for quantifying the changes in the three-dimensional shape of the spine and posterior rib cage after anterior correction and fusion. Goal of the present study was to determine the accuracy for the more common posterior correction and fusion with attention paid to the presence of the posterior implants and scarring.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients with idiopathic scoliosis with maximum Cobb angles of 78 degrees were examined by rasterstereography and radiography. Seventy-one anterior-posterior radiographs were digitised. Twenty-four were preoperative and 47 postoperative radiographs. Rasterstereographic and radiographic curves were compared by best-fit superimposition. Root-mean-square differences were calculated as parameters of accuracy.
RESULTS: The accuracy of rasterstereography in severe idiopathic scoliosis with Cobb angles between 48 degrees and 78 degrees was satisfactory with root-mean-square differences of 5.8 mm for the lateral deviation and 4.8 degrees for vertebral rotation. Following posterior correction the accuracy was good. The root-mean-square difference was 4.5 mm for the lateral deviation and 4.3 degrees for vertebral rotation.
CONCLUSION: The accuracy obtained for posteriorly-operated scolioses between 50 degrees and 80 degrees was similar to the findings for scolioses operated via anterior approach, as well as those with curves up to 50 degrees Cobb angle. Therefore rasterstereography can be used postoperatively to reduce the number of radiographs and radiation exposure. Additionally, the method provides an objective quantification of the postoperative improvement in the cosmesis of the back shape. RELEVANCE: In the treatment of severe idiopathic scoliosis rasterstereography provides both a considerable reduction of X-rays and an objective documentation of the cosmesis before after scoliosis surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14580831     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(03)00169-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  21 in total

Review 1.  [Radiation-free diagnosis of scoliosis : An overview of the surface and spine topography].

Authors:  M Betsch; M Wild; B Rath; M Tingart; A Schulze; V Quack
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Answer to the Letter to the Editor of J. Padulo concerning: "Vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis calculated by radiograph and back surface analysis-based methods: correlation between the Raimondi method and rasterstereography" by Mangone M, Raimondi P, Paoloni M, Pellanera S, Di Michele A, Di Renzo S, Vanadia M, Dimaggio M, Murgia M, Santilli V (2013) Eur Spine J 22:367-371.

Authors:  M Mangone; M Paoloni
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Formetric rasterstereography: a new perspective. Reply to Padulo and Ardigó.

Authors:  M Krause; M Amling; F Barvencik
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Formetric rasterstereography: a new perspective.

Authors:  J Padulo; L P Ardigò
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Clinical investigation and imaging.

Authors:  Daniel Studer
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Rasterstereographic analysis of axial back surface rotation in standing versus forward bending posture in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lars Hackenberg; Eberhard Hierholzer; Viola Bullmann; Ulf Liljenqvist; Christian Götze
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Influence of non-traumatic thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures on sagittal spine alignment assessed by radiation-free spinometry.

Authors:  M Krause; S Breer; B Mohrmann; E Vettorazzi; R P Marshall; M Amling; F Barvencik
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Sagittal back contour and craniofacial morphology in preadolescents.

Authors:  Carsten Lippold; Emil Segatto; András Végh; Burkhard Drerup; Tatjana Moiseenko; Gholamreza Danesh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis calculated by radiograph and back surface analysis-based methods: correlation between the Raimondi method and rasterstereography.

Authors:  Massimiliano Mangone; Paolo Raimondi; Marco Paoloni; Sabina Pellanera; Alessandra Di Michele; Sara Di Renzo; Mariangela Vanadia; Mauro Dimaggio; Massimiliano Murgia; Valter Santilli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Intra- and interday reliability of spine rasterstereography.

Authors:  Laura Guidetti; Valerio Bonavolontà; Alessandro Tito; Victor M Reis; Maria Chiara Gallotta; Carlo Baldari
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.