| Literature DB >> 23133615 |
Chun-Hong Liu1, Xin Ma, Feng Li, Yong-Jun Wang, Chang-Le Tie, Su-Fang Li, Tao-Lin Chen, Ting-ting Fan, Yu Zhang, Jie Dong, Li Yao, Xia Wu, Chuan-Yue Wang.
Abstract
AIM: We sought to use a regional homogeneity (ReHo) approach as an index in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the features of spontaneous brain activity within the default mode network (DMN) in patients suffering from bipolar depression (BD).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23133615 PMCID: PMC3487908 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048181
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1The DMN maps in both the BD and HC groups.
These maps are the results of the within group one-sample t-test with family wise error (FWE) corrected p = 0.05.
Brain Areas with Significantly Increased Reho in Patients with BD Relative to the HCsa.
| Montreal Neurological | |||
| Institute Coordinate | Analysis | ||
| Extent of Cluster | Cluster Size (voxels) | Voxel (x,y,z) |
|
| Left medial frontal gyrus | 45 | 0, 42, 24 | 3.66 |
| Left inferior parietal lobe | 171 | −42, −60, 48 | 5.28 |
Differences were significant at p = 0.01.
Data indicate coordinates corresponding to voxels with maximum (peak) effect sizes.
Figure 2Statistical maps showing two sample t-test results of the ReHo maps between the BD and the HC groups (p<0.01, cluster size >12 voxels).
Red and green denote increased ReHo. The color bars indicate the t-values.
depressive episodes
. No brain region demonstrated significant correlations with sex, patient age, educational years, HAMD score, or illness length within the BD group (Table 2).Brain areas with significant between-group ReHo differences within the DMN and various clinical measures.
| Brain regions | Side | Sex | Age | Education level | HAMD score | Number of depressive episodes | Illness length |
| Median frontal gyrus | Left | 0.322 | −0.156 | −0.083 | −0.065 | 0.378 | 0.217 |
| Inferior parietal lobe | Left | 0.149 | 0.134 | −0.272 | −0.011 | 0.350 | 0.042 |
Abbreviations: HAMD, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. The values in the table are Pearson’s Correlation Coefficients.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants.
| Variables (Mean±S.D.) | Bipolar depression(n = 26) | Healthy controls(n = 26) |
|
|
| Gender (M: F)Age (years) | 9∶1732.35±11.31 | 10∶1631.92±12.19 |
| 0.770.90 |
| Age range | 20–57 | 20–58 | _ | – |
| Education level (years) | 12.32±2.0 | 13.15±2.13 | T(1, 50) = 1.449 | 0.15 |
| HAMD score | 19.65±2.48 | – | – | – |
| Duration of disease (years) | 4.20±1.70 | – | – | – |
| Number of depressive episodes | 3.44±1.45 | – | – | – |
| On Antidepressants | – | – | – | |
| Citalopram | 7 | – | – | – |
| Sertraline | 8 | – | – | – |
| On Mood-stabilizer | – | – | – | |
| Lithium | 19 | – | – | – |
| Sodium valproate | 6 | – | – | – |
| Divalproex | 15 | – | – | – |
| On Antipsychotics | 16 | – | – | – |
| Quetiapin | 10 | – | – | – |
| Olanzapin | 1 | – | – | – |
| Risperidone | 5 | – | – | – |
Abbreviations: S. D., standard deviation; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.