PURPOSE: Occurrence of atrial tachycardias (ATs) following radiofrequency (RF) pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is a frequent complication. Cryoballoon (CB) ablation might create more homogeneous and demarcated lesions than traditional point by point RF approach, hypothetically leading to a lower incidence of ATs. Our aim is to compare incidence and mechanism of regular ATs occurring after ablation of PAF by means of circumferential point by point RF vs CB ablation. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-six consecutive patients undergoing a first PV isolation procedure, as treatment for PAF, were included and followed up for 12 months. Point by point RF ablation was performed in 186 patients and CB ablation in the remaining 100. Among the last ones, first generation (CB-1) was used in 59 patients and second generation one (CB-2) in 41. RESULTS: Incidence of regular ATs was higher following RF PV isolation when compared with CB ablation (11.3 vs 3.0%, P = 0.028). When compared separately with RF ablation, both CB-1 and CB-2 presented lower incidences of ATs (5.1 and 0.0%) but differences only remained significant for the CB-2 (P = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Patients with PAF undergoing a first PV isolation procedure by means of CB ablation present a significantly lower incidence of ATs than those in which PV isolation is achieved by means of circumferential point by point RF ablation.
PURPOSE: Occurrence of atrial tachycardias (ATs) following radiofrequency (RF) pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is a frequent complication. Cryoballoon (CB) ablation might create more homogeneous and demarcated lesions than traditional point by point RF approach, hypothetically leading to a lower incidence of ATs. Our aim is to compare incidence and mechanism of regular ATs occurring after ablation of PAF by means of circumferential point by point RF vs CB ablation. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-six consecutive patients undergoing a first PV isolation procedure, as treatment for PAF, were included and followed up for 12 months. Point by point RF ablation was performed in 186 patients and CB ablation in the remaining 100. Among the last ones, first generation (CB-1) was used in 59 patients and second generation one (CB-2) in 41. RESULTS: Incidence of regular ATs was higher following RF PV isolation when compared with CB ablation (11.3 vs 3.0%, P = 0.028). When compared separately with RF ablation, both CB-1 and CB-2 presented lower incidences of ATs (5.1 and 0.0%) but differences only remained significant for the CB-2 (P = 0.027). CONCLUSION:Patients with PAF undergoing a first PV isolation procedure by means of CB ablation present a significantly lower incidence of ATs than those in which PV isolation is achieved by means of circumferential point by point RF ablation.
Authors: Jason G Andrade; Marc Dubuc; Peter G Guerra; Laurent Macle; Blandine Mondésert; Léna Rivard; Denis Roy; Mario Talajic; Bernard Thibault; Paul Khairy Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2012-06-05 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Antonio Sorgente; Gian Battista Chierchia; Carlo de Asmundis; Andrea Sarkozy; Mehdi Namdar; Lucio Capulzini; Yoshinao Yazaki; Stephan-Andreas Müller-Burri; Fatih Bayrak; Pedro Brugada Journal: Europace Date: 2010-10-25 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Edward P Gerstenfeld; David J Callans; Sanjay Dixit; Andrea M Russo; Hemal Nayak; David Lin; Ward Pulliam; Sultan Siddique; Francis E Marchlinski Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-09-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gian Battista Chierchia; Carlo de Asmundis; Stephan-Andreas Müller-Burri; Andrea Sarkozy; Lucio Capulzini; Gaetano Paparella; Sergio Chierchia; Markus Roos; Pedro Brugada Journal: Europace Date: 2008-12-22 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Alexander Fürnkranz; Stefano Bordignon; Boris Schmidt; Melanie Gunawardene; Britta Schulte-Hahn; Verena Urban; Frank Bode; Bernd Nowak; Julian K R Chun Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2013-02-11
Authors: Thomas Neumann; Jürgen Vogt; Burghard Schumacher; Anja Dorszewski; Malte Kuniss; Hans Neuser; Klaus Kurzidim; Alexander Berkowitsch; Marcus Koller; Johannes Heintze; Ursula Scholz; Ulrike Wetzel; Michael A E Schneider; Dieter Horstkotte; Christian W Hamm; Heinz-Friedrich Pitschner Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-07-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Vivek Y Reddy; Petr Neuzil; Andre d'Avila; Margaret Laragy; Zachary J Malchano; Stepan Kralovec; Steven J Kim; Jeremy N Ruskin Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2007-11-07 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Arash Aryana; Sheldon M Singh; Giacomo Mugnai; Carlo de Asmundis; Marcin Kowalski; Deep K Pujara; Andrew I Cohen; Steve K Singh; Charles E Fuenzalida; Nelson Prager; Mark R Bowers; Padraig Gearoid O'Neill; Pedro Brugada; André d'Avila; Gian-Battista Chierchia Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2016-07-30 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Wilber W Su; Muhanad Alzubaidi; Roger Tseng; Nicholas Jebaily; Yenn-Jiang Lin; Paul J Wang Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Alvise Del Monte; Luigi Pannone; Antonio Bisignani; Thiago G Osório; Saverio Iacopino; Gian-Battista Chierchia; Carlo de Asmundis Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-07-28