BACKGROUND: Medical educators believe bedside rounds are effective for the delivery of patient-centered care, and are necessary in helping trainees acquire competence in clinical care. Although recommendations for bedside rounds have been reported, a recent, systematic assessment of strategies used by current-day bedside teachers was needed to advance knowledge of this teaching method. OBJECTIVE: To identify and understand bedside teachers' 1) preparatory steps, 2) patient selection, and 3) role allocation during the process of bedside rounds. DESIGN: A qualitative inductive thematic analysis using transcripts from audio-recorded, semi-structured telephone interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine physicians (n = 34) who perform bedside rounds from ten academic US institutions (2010-2011). APPROACH: A purposive sampling strategy was utilized to identify physicians who were active inpatient attending physicians and met specific inclusion criteria for "bedside rounds." A total of 34 interviews were completed, and each was recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis extracted key themes pertaining to the three objectives. KEY RESULTS: Most respondents (51 %) were associate or full professors, with an average of 14 years of academic experience. Attending physicians prepared using trainee-specific, patient-specific and disease-specific information, while also mentally preparing for bedside rounds. They sought trainee buy-in and learning objectives, reviewed expectations and methods to ensure patient comfort, and provided early guidance with bedside encounters. Patients were selected if they required immediate care, were new to the service, or had a high educational value, while patients were deferred if unavailable, unwilling, or unable to communicate. The team members' roles during bedside rounds varied, with trainees being given graduated autonomy with increased experience. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside teachers' methods for preparation, patient selection, and role allocation during bedside rounds enhance trainees' education within the workplace. Strategies used by experienced bedside teachers can be used for faculty development efforts aimed at promoting this activity.
BACKGROUND: Medical educators believe bedside rounds are effective for the delivery of patient-centered care, and are necessary in helping trainees acquire competence in clinical care. Although recommendations for bedside rounds have been reported, a recent, systematic assessment of strategies used by current-day bedside teachers was needed to advance knowledge of this teaching method. OBJECTIVE: To identify and understand bedside teachers' 1) preparatory steps, 2) patient selection, and 3) role allocation during the process of bedside rounds. DESIGN: A qualitative inductive thematic analysis using transcripts from audio-recorded, semi-structured telephone interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine physicians (n = 34) who perform bedside rounds from ten academic US institutions (2010-2011). APPROACH: A purposive sampling strategy was utilized to identify physicians who were active inpatient attending physicians and met specific inclusion criteria for "bedside rounds." A total of 34 interviews were completed, and each was recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis extracted key themes pertaining to the three objectives. KEY RESULTS: Most respondents (51 %) were associate or full professors, with an average of 14 years of academic experience. Attending physicians prepared using trainee-specific, patient-specific and disease-specific information, while also mentally preparing for bedside rounds. They sought trainee buy-in and learning objectives, reviewed expectations and methods to ensure patient comfort, and provided early guidance with bedside encounters. Patients were selected if they required immediate care, were new to the service, or had a high educational value, while patients were deferred if unavailable, unwilling, or unable to communicate. The team members' roles during bedside rounds varied, with trainees being given graduated autonomy with increased experience. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside teachers' methods for preparation, patient selection, and role allocation during bedside rounds enhance trainees' education within the workplace. Strategies used by experienced bedside teachers can be used for faculty development efforts aimed at promoting this activity.
Authors: Jason R Frank; Linda S Snell; Olle Ten Cate; Eric S Holmboe; Carol Carraccio; Susan R Swing; Peter Harris; Nicholas J Glasgow; Craig Campbell; Deepak Dath; Ronald M Harden; William Iobst; Donlin M Long; Rani Mungroo; Denyse L Richardson; Jonathan Sherbino; Ivan Silver; Sarah Taber; Martin Talbot; Kenneth A Harris Journal: Med Teach Date: 2010 Impact factor: 3.650
Authors: Brita Roy; Analia Castiglioni; Ryan R Kraemer; Amanda H Salanitro; Lisa L Willett; Richard M Shewchuk; Haiyan Qu; Gustavo Heudebert; Robert M Centor Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ralph I Horwitz; Jerome P Kassirer; Eric S Holmboe; Holly J Humphrey; Abraham Verghese; Carol Croft; Minjung Kwok; Joseph Loscalzo Journal: Am J Med Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: H E M Daelmans; R J I Hoogenboom; A J M Donker; A J J A Scherpbier; C D A Stehouwer; C P M van der Vleuten Journal: Med Teach Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 3.650
Authors: Steven R Simon; Darlene Davis; Antoinette S Peters; Kelley M Skeff; Robert H Fletcher Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Rebecca Blankenburg; Joan F Hilton; Patrick Yuan; Stephanie Rennke; Brad Monash; Stephanie M Harman; Debbie S Sakai; Poonam Hosamani; Adeena Khan; Ian Chua; Eric Huynh; Lisa Shieh; Lijia Xie Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Brita Roy; Lisa L Willett; Carol Bates; Briar Duffy; Kathel Dunn; Reena Karani; Shobhina G Chheda Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jason M Satterfield; Sylvia Bereknyei; Joan F Hilton; Alyssa L Bogetz; Rebecca Blankenburg; Sara M Buckelew; H Carrie Chen; Bradley Monash; Jacqueline S Ramos; Stephanie Rennke; Clarence H Braddock Journal: Acad Med Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Ann Ding; Temple A Ratcliffe; Alanna Diamond; Erika O Bowen; Lauren S Penney; Meghan A Crabtree; Kanapa Kornsawad; Christopher J Moreland; Sean E Garcia; Luci K Leykum Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Jed D Gonzalo; Brian S Heist; Briar L Duffy; Liselotte Dyrbye; Mark J Fagan; Gary Ferenchick; Heather Harrell; Paul A Hemmer; Walter N Kernan; Jennifer R Kogan; Colleen Rafferty; Raymond Wong; D Michael Elnicki Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 5.128