Literature DB >> 23129125

The response to selection for broad male response to female sex pheromone and its implications for divergence in close-range mating behavior in the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis.

David C Droney1, Callie J Musto, Katie Mancuso, Wendell L Roelofs, Charles E Linn.   

Abstract

Coordinated sexual communication systems, seen in many species of moths, are hypothesized to be under strong stabilizing natural selection. Stabilized communication systems should be resistant to change, but there are examples of species/populations that show great diversification. A possible solution is that it is directional sexual selection on variation in male response that drives evolution. We tested a component of this model by asking whether 'rare' males (ca. 5 % of all males in a population) of the European corn borer moth (ECB), Ostrinia nubilalis, that respond to the sex pheromones of both ECB and a different Ostrinia species (O. furnacalis, the Asian corn borer, ACB), might play an important role in diversification. We specifically tested, via artificial selection, whether this broad male response has an evolvable genetic component. We increased the frequency of broad male response from 5 to 70 % in 19 generations, showing that broad-responding males could be important for the evolution of novel communication systems in ECB. We did not find a broader range of mating acceptance of broad males by females of the base population, however, suggesting that broad response would be unlikely to increase in frequency without the involvement of other factors. However, we found that ECB selection-line females accepted a broader range of courting males, including those of ACB, than did females of the base population. Thus, a genetic correlation exists between broad, long-range response to female sex pheromone and the breadth of female acceptance of males at close range. These results are discussed in the context of evolution of novel communication systems in Ostrinia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23129125     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-012-0208-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  24 in total

1.  Sexual selection and speciation.

Authors:  T M. Panhuis; R Butlin; M Zuk; T Tregenza
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  The evolution of pheromone diversity.

Authors:  Matthew R E Symonds; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Evolution of male pheromones in moths: reproductive isolation through sexual selection?

Authors:  P L Phelan; T C Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Evidence of olfactory antagonistic imposition as a facilitator of evolutionary shifts in pheromone blend usage in Ostrinia spp. (Lepidoptera: Crambidae).

Authors:  Michael J Domingue; Callie J Musto; Charles E Linn; Wendell L Roelofs; Thomas C Baker
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 2.354

5.  Potential for evolution of resistance to pheromones: Interindividual and interpopulational variation in chemical communication system of pink bollworm moth.

Authors:  K F Haynes; L K Gaston; M M Pope; T C Baker
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Sex pheromone production and perception in European corn borer moths is determined by both autosomal and sex-linked genes.

Authors:  W Roelofs; T Glover; X H Tang; I Sreng; P Robbins; C Eckenrode; C Löfstedt; B S Hansson; B O Bengtsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Bidirectional selection for novel pheromone blend ratios in the almond moth, Cadra cautella.

Authors:  Jeremy D Allison; Ring T Cardé
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Trade-off between sensitivity and specificity in the cabbage looper moth response to sex pheromone.

Authors:  Daniel J Hemmann; Jeremy D Allison; Kenneth F Haynes
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Novel sex pheromone desaturases in the genomes of corn borers generated through gene duplication and retroposon fusion.

Authors:  Bingye Xue; Alejandro P Rooney; Masaki Kajikawa; Norihiro Okada; Wendell L Roelofs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Silent genes and rare males: a fresh look at pheromone blend response specificity in the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis.

Authors:  Charles Linn; Marion O'Connor; Wendell Roelofs
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 1.857

View more
  4 in total

1.  Within-population variability in a moth sex pheromone blend: genetic basis and behavioural consequences.

Authors:  Astrid T Groot; Gerhard Schöfl; Ollie Inglis; Susanne Donnerhacke; Alice Classen; Antje Schmalz; Richard G Santangelo; Jennifer Emerson; Fred Gould; Coby Schal; David G Heckel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Male antenna morphology and its effect on scramble competition in false garden mantids.

Authors:  Anuradhi Jayaweera; Katherine L Barry
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-08-23

3.  Proximate Mechanisms of Host Plant Location by a Specialist Phytophagous Insect, the Grape Berry Moth, Paralobesia Viteana.

Authors:  Michael S Wolfin; Ronald R Chilson; Jonathan Thrall; Yuxi Liu; Sara Volo; Dong H Cha; Gregory M Loeb; Charles E Linn
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Plant odor and sex pheromone are integral elements of specific mate recognition in an insect herbivore.

Authors:  Felipe Borrero-Echeverry; Marie Bengtsson; Kiyoshi Nakamuta; Peter Witzgall
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 3.694

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.