Literature DB >> 31755018

Proximate Mechanisms of Host Plant Location by a Specialist Phytophagous Insect, the Grape Berry Moth, Paralobesia Viteana.

Michael S Wolfin1,2, Ronald R Chilson3, Jonathan Thrall4, Yuxi Liu4, Sara Volo4, Dong H Cha5, Gregory M Loeb3, Charles E Linn3.   

Abstract

There are contrasting hypotheses regarding the role of plant volatiles in host plant location. We used the grape berry moth (GBM; Paralobesia viteana)-grape plant (Vitis spp.) complex as a model for studying the proximate mechanisms of long distance olfactory-mediated, host-plant location and selection by a specialist phytophagous insect. We used flight tunnel assays to observe GBM female in-flight responses to host (V. riparia) and non-host (apple, Malus domestica; and gray dogwood, Cornus racimosa,) odor sources in the form of plant shoots, extracts of shoots, and synthetic blends. Gas chromatography-electroantennographic detection and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analyses were used to identify antennal-active volatile compounds. All antennal-active compounds found in grape shoots were also present in dogwood and apple shoots. Female GBM flew upwind to host and non-host extracts and synthetic blends at similar levels, suggesting discrimination is not occurring at long distance from the plant. Further, females did not land on sources releasing plant extracts and synthetic blends, suggesting not all landing cues were present. Additionally, mated and unmated moths displayed similar levels of upwind flight responses to all odor sources, supporting the idea that plant volatiles are not functioning solely as ovipositional cues. The results of this study support a hypothesis that GBM females are using volatile blends to locate a favorable habitat rather than a specific host plant, and that discrimination is occurring within the habitat, or even post-landing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flight tunnel; GC-EAD; Grape berry moth; Habitat cues; Insect semiochemicals; Lepidoptera; Tortricidae; Volatile collection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31755018     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-019-01112-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  27 in total

1.  The raison d'ĕtre of secondary plant substances; these odd chemicals arose as a means of protecting plants from insects and now guide insects to food.

Authors:  G S FRAENKEL
Journal:  Science       Date:  1959-05-29       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Insect host location: a volatile situation.

Authors:  Toby J A Bruce; Lester J Wadhams; Christine M Woodcock
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 18.313

3.  Chemical signals from host plant and sexual behavior in a moth.

Authors:  A K Raina; T G Kingan; A K Mattoo
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Flight tunnel responses of female grape berry moth (Paralobesia viteana) to host plants.

Authors:  Dong H Cha; Stephen P Hesler; Charles L Moser; Satoshi Nojima; Charles E Linn; Wendell L Roelofs; Gregory M Loeb
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Early quality assessment lessens pheromone specificity in a moth.

Authors:  Zsolt Kárpáti; Marco Tasin; Ring T Cardé; Teun Dekker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Relative performance of European grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana) on grapes and other hosts.

Authors:  Denis Thiéry; Jérôme Moreau
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  (-)-Germacrene D increases attraction and oviposition by the tobacco budworm moth Heliothis virescens.

Authors:  R Mozuraitis; M Stranden; M I Ramirez; A-K Borg-Karlson; H Mustaparta
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  The response to selection for broad male response to female sex pheromone and its implications for divergence in close-range mating behavior in the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis.

Authors:  David C Droney; Callie J Musto; Katie Mancuso; Wendell L Roelofs; Charles E Linn
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Eavesdropping on plant volatiles by a specialist moth: significance of ratio and concentration.

Authors:  Dong H Cha; Charles E Linn; Peter E A Teal; Aijun Zhang; Wendell L Roelofs; Gregory M Loeb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Interactions of carbon dioxide and food odours in Drosophila: olfactory hedonics and sensory neuron properties.

Authors:  Cécile P Faucher; Monika Hilker; Marien de Bruyne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.