| Literature DB >> 23125921 |
Monika Cahova1, Helena Dankova, Eliska Palenickova, Zuzana Papackova, Ludmila Kazdova.
Abstract
Aims. To determine the effect of two different diets (high-sucrose (HS) and high-fat (HF)) on the main metabolic pathways potentially contributing to the development of steatosis: (1) activity of the liver lysosomal and heparin-releasable lipases; (2) fatty acid (FFA) oxidation; (3) FFA synthesis de novo; (4) VLDL output in vivo in a rat model of metabolic syndrome (MetS), hereditary hypertriglyceridemic (HHTg) rats fed HS or HF diets. Results. Both diets resulted in triacylglycerol (TAG) accumulation in the liver (HF > HS). The intracellular TAG lipolysis by lysosomal lipase was increased in both groups and positively correlated with the liver TAG content. Diet type significantly affected partitioning of intracellular TAG-derived fatty acids among FFA-utilizing metabolic pathways as HS feeding accentuated VLDL secretion and downregulated FFA oxidation while the HF diet had an entirely opposite effect. FFA de novo synthesis from glucose was significantly enhanced in the HS group (fed ≫ fasted) while being completely eradicated in the HF group. Conclusions. We found that in rats prone to the development of MetS associated diseases dietary-induced steatosis is not simply a result of impaired TAG degradation but that it depends on other mechanisms (elevated FFA synthesis or attenuated VLDL secretion) that are specific according to diet composition.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23125921 PMCID: PMC3483727 DOI: 10.1155/2012/757205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Metab ISSN: 2090-0724
Figure 1Evolution of body weight in SD, HSD, or HFD fed rats. Body weight was measured three times a week from the beginning of the feeding period till the end of week 4. Mean values ± s.e. obtained in each group are represented. *Significant difference between SD and HSD with P < 0.05 or more; #Significant difference between SD and HSD with P < 0.05 or less.
Characteristics of experimental groups.
| Prediet | SD | HS | HF | P | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 281 ± 3 | 311 ± 4*** | 335 ± 15*** | 364 ± 10*** | <0.05 | <0.001 | |
| Epididymal fat (g) | — | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.3* | 5.5 ± 0.5*** | <0.05 | <0.001 | |
| s-glucose (mmol/L) | Fasted | 4.5 ± 0.2 | 4.6 ± 0.1 | 4.5 ± 0.05 | 5.4 ± 0.05* | N.S. | <0.05 |
| Fed | 6.2 ± 0.2 | 6 ± 0.1 | 11.4 ± 0.1*** | 7.6 ± 0.4* | <0.001 | <0.05 | |
| s-insulin (pmol/L) | Fasted | 126 ± 18 | 135 ± 21 | 155 ± 12 | 204 ± 20* | N.S. | <0.05 |
| Fed | 155 ± 20 | 158 ± 15 | 342 ± 29*** | 127 ± 18 | <0.001 | N.S. | |
| s-TAG (mmol/L) | Fasted | 1.3 ± 0.25 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 4.9 ± 0.5*** | 1.4 ± 0.3 | <0.001 | N.S. |
| Fed | 2 ± 0.4 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 7.2 ± 0.4*** | 1.8 ± 0.2 | <0.001 | <0.05 | |
| s-FFA (mmol/L) | Fasted | 0.65 ± 0.03 | 0.7 ± 0.05 | 1 ± 0.09* | 0.6 ± 0.08 | <0.05 | N.S. |
| Fed | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0.4 ± 0.02 | 1.3 ± 0.1*** | 0.45 ± 0.07 | <0.001 | N.S. | |
| s- | Fasted | 1.2 ± 0.04 | 1.3 ± 0.05 | 2.2 ± 0.14** | 3.8 ± 0.2*** | <0.01 | <0.001 |
| Fed | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.45 ± 0.05*** | N.S. | <0.001 |
Data are given as mean ± SEM, n = 6. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 before versus after diet.
Liver triacylglycerol content.
| Diet | Fasted | Fed |
|---|---|---|
| SD | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 3.7 ± 0.2 |
| HS | 7.6 ± 0.6** | 4.8 ± 0.2† |
| HF | 14 ± 1.1### | 20.8 ± 2.3xxx |
Data are given in μmol·g−1 wet weight and expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6.
**P < 0.01 HS fasted versus SD fasted; † P < 0.05 HS fed versus SD fed; ### P < 0.001 HF fasted versus SD fasted; xxx P < 0.001 HF fed versus SD fed.
Figure 2Glucose incorporation into lipids in liver slices in vitro. The utilisation of glucose for esterification and de novo fatty acid synthesis was determined in the same sample as glucose incorporation into total lipids (described in Section 2). open bars = fasted animals; closed bars = fed animals. All data are means SEM, n = 6 individual incubations for each bar. ***P < 0.001 HS-fasted versus SD-fasted; †† P < 0.01, ††† P < 0.001 HS-fed versus SD-fed; x P < 0.05 HF-fed versus SD-fed.
The incorporation of intracellular TAG-derived 14C palmitic acid into CO2, TCA intermediates, secreted β-hydroxybutyrate, and secreted triacylglycerols from liver slices in vitro.
| SD | HS | HF | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fasted | Fed | Fasted | Fed | Fasted | Fed | |
| CO2 (released) | 16 ± 1.2 | 11.9 ± 1 | 11 ± 1.5* | 8.3 ± 0.3† | 15 ± 0.7 | 9.8 ± 0.8 |
| TCA intermediates (intracellular) | 55.3 ± 1.6 | 41 ± 3.4 | 46.6 ± 1.8** | 25.7 ± 1.5††† | 54.2 ± 4.2 | 40.3 ± 1 |
|
| 269 ± 9 | 204 ± 8 | 380 ± 18** | 178 ± 15 | 452 ± 22### | 480 ± 11xxx |
| TAG (secreted) | 581 ± 35 | 401 ± 44 | 713 ± 29** | 825 ± 29††† | 314 ± 16### | 286 ± 35xx |
Data are expressed in nmol palmitic acid per g tissue and given as mean ± SEM n = 6. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 HS fasted versus SD fasted; † P < 0.05, ††† P < 0.001 HS fed versus SD fed; ### P < 0.001 HF fasted versus SD fasted; xx P < 0.01, xxx P < 0.001 HF fed versus SD fed.
Figure 3The activity of lysosomal (a) and hepatic (b) lipase in liver homogenate measured as FFA release from artificial substrate (3H-triolein). The lipase activity was measured as the release of fatty acids at pH = 4.5 from 3H triolein. Open bars = fasted animals; closed bars = fed animals. ‡ P < fed versus fasted; *P < 0.05 HS-fasted versus SD-fasted; ### P < 0.001 HF-fasted versus SD-fasted; xxx P < 0.001 HF-fed versus SD-fed.
The intracellular distribution of lipases activities in liver.
| Lysosomal lipase | Hepatic lipase | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diet | 10 000 g sediment | 10 000 g supernatant | 10 000 g sediment | 10 000 g supernatant | ||||
| Fasted | Fed | Fasted | Fed | Fasted | Fed | Fasted | Fed | |
| SD | 86 ± 9.2 | 85 ± 2 | 14 ± 1.5 | 15 ± 2 | 30 ± 4 | 23 ± 2 | 70 ± 5 | 77 ± 9.5 |
| HS | 87 ± 6.8 | 86 ± 7.3 | 13 ± 0.8 | 14 ± 3.6 | 40 ± 8.3 | 38 ± 7.3 | 60 ± 8.2 | 72 ± 5 |
| HF | 82 ± 4 | 75 ± 3xx | 18 ± 2# | 25 ± 2xx | 38 ± 5.2 | 24 ± 3.1 | 62 ± 4.5 | 76 ± 7 |
Data are given in % of the sum of the activities in 10 000 g sediment and supernatant prepared from liver homogenates, n = 6. # P < 0.05 HF fasted versus SD fasted; xx P < 0.01 HF fed versus SD fed.
Figure 4The correlation between lysosomal lipase activity and hepatic triacylglycerol content in fasted (a) and fed (b) animals. Lysosomal lipase activity was determined as the FFA release from endogenous TAG. Open circle = SD-fasted; open square = HS-fasted; open triangle = HF-fasted; closed circle = SD-fed; closed square = HS-fed; closed triangle = HF-fed.
Figure 5The correlation between lysosomal lipase activity and β-hydroxybutyrate content in serum. Lysosomal lipase activity was determined as the FFA release from endogenous TAG. Open circle = SD-fasted; open square = HS-fasted; open triangle = HF-fasted; closed circle = SD-fed; closed square = HS-fed; closed triangle = HF-fed.
Effect of HS and HF diet on TAG entry rate.
| SD | HS | HF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAG0 ( | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 6.4 ± 0.5+++ | 3.0 ± 0.1••,¶¶¶ |
| TAG90 ( | 7.4 ± 0.4 | 11.7 ± 0.75+++ | 5.2 ± 0.44••,¶¶¶ |
| TAG entry rate ( | 11.2 ± 0.7 | 45.7 ± 6.1+++ | 8.2 ± 0.5••,¶¶¶ |
TAG0: triacylglycerol serum concentration before WR 1339 administration; TAG90: triacylglycerol serum concentration 90 min after WR 1339 administration. TAG entry rate was calculated according to the formula TAG entry rate (μmol·100 g b. wt.−1·hr−1) = [(T90−T0)/1.5] × V × (W/100). Data are given as mean ± S.E.M. n = 6. +++ P < 0.001 HS versus SD; ### P < 0.001 HF fasted versus SD fasted; •• P < 0.01 HF versus SD; ¶¶¶ P < 0.001 HF versus HS.