| Literature DB >> 28936471 |
Ursula Andreo1, Ype P de Jong1,2, Margaret A Scull1, Jing W Xiao1, Koen Vercauteren1, Corrine Quirk1, Michiel C Mommersteeg1, Sonia Bergaya3, Arjun Menon3, Edward A Fisher3, Charles M Rice1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a leading cause of chronic liver diseases and the most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States. HCV particles in the blood of infected patients are characterized by heterogeneous buoyant densities, likely owing to HCV association with lipoproteins. However, clinical isolates are not infectious in vitro and the relative infectivity of the particles with respect to their buoyant density therefore cannot be determined, pointing to the need for better in vivo model systems.Entities:
Keywords: Alb-uPA, Albumin-urokinase plasminogen activator; CETP, cholesterol ester transfer protein; FAH, fumaryl acetoacetate hydrolase; FNRG, absence of fumaryl acetoacetate hydrolase on a immunodeficient NOD Rag gamma IL2 deficient mouse background; FPLC, fast-performance liquid chromatography; HCV; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HCVcc, cell culture–derived hepatitis C virus; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; Human Liver Chimeric Mice; LVP, lipoviroparticle; Lipoprotein; Mouse Model; NRG, nod rag γ; NTBC, nitisinone; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; SCID, severe combined immunodeficiency disease; VLDL, very low density lipoprotein; apo, apolipoprotein
Year: 2017 PMID: 28936471 PMCID: PMC5602752 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.07.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol ISSN: 2352-345X
Figure 1Comparison of HCV infectivity buoyant density distribution between cell culture–derived and mouse-passaged J6/JFH1. HCVcc prepared by electroporation of in vitro–transcribed viral RNA into Huh-7.5 cells and a mouse-passaged sample were used for buoyant density analysis. HCV particles were separated on 10%–40% iodixanol gradients. Twelve fractions were collected and HCV infectivity in each fraction was assessed by limiting dilution to determine TCID50/mL and are represented as the distribution of infectivity as a percentage of the total.
Figure 2Lipoprotein profiles of FNRG and human liver chimeric FNRG mice. (A) Total cholesterol and (C) triglyceride (TG) levels were measured in the serum of FNRG and noninfected human liver chimeric FNRG mice that were highly engrafted (defined as having > 1 mg/mL human serum albumin levels) using commercial diagnostic kits (WAKO). Statistical differences were analyzed using an unpaired t test (n = 7). (B and D) Lipoprotein profiles of FNRG and noninfected human liver chimeric FNRG mice were determined by FPLC using pooled plasma (n = 5). The fractions corresponding to the lipoprotein particles noted in the figure were determined by prior analysis of lipoproteins derived from both mouse and human plasma by density gradient centrifugation. (B) Cholesterol and (D) triglyceride content in each fraction was determined using commercial diagnostic kits (WAKO). AU, arbitrary unit.
Figure 3Triglyceride (TG) profiles of FNRG, NRG, and FRG mice. (A) Total triglyceride levels were measured in the serum of FNRG, NRG, and FRG using commercial diagnostic kits (WAKO). Statistical differences were compared by analysis of variance using the Bonferroni multiple comparison test (**P < .01; ***P < .001) (n = 5). (B and C) Lipoprotein profiles of FNRG, NRG, and FRG mice were determined by FPLC. The fractions corresponding to the lipoprotein particles noted in the figure were determined by prior analysis of lipoproteins derived from both mouse and human plasma by density gradient centrifugation. The tracing comes from the mean of 2 experiments of pooled plasma (n = 5). (C) Triglyceride content in each fraction was determined using commercial diagnostic kits (WAKO). (C) The relative content of triglycerides in the peak fractions is represented for each of the 2 experiments. AU, arbitrary unit.
Figure 4Buoyant density distribution of HCV RNA and infectivity at 2 and 5 weeks after infection. (A) Sera of 4 representative liver chimeric mice (numbered 7343, 7350, 7337, 7339) infected with J6/JFH1 were collected. HCV particles were separated on a 10%–40% iodixanol gradient. Twelve fractions of 1 mL were collected. HCV RNA was quantified by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction in each fraction (represented by the black line graph), and HCV infectivity in each fraction was assessed by limiting dilution to determine TCID50/mL (represented by the filled gray area). Each mouse number is indicated. (B) The percentage of total infectivity (TCID50 in each fraction/sum of TCID50 in all fractions) in each fraction of corresponding density is represented for 2 weeks after infection (left) and for 5 weeks after infection (right). (C) Specific infectivity was calculated for each fraction by dividing the number of infectious particles (TCID50/mL) with the number of RNA molecules (HCV RNA copies/mL). The more infectious the virus is the closest to one the specific infectivity. (D) Analysis of the immunoreactivity of the fractions to apoE and apoC1 by Western blot for 2 weeks after infection (left) and 5 weeks after infection (right). Representative immunoblots are shown.
Figure 5Effect of 10% sucrose feeding on HCV infectivity buoyant density distribution. (A) Schematic of the experiment outline. A group of 13 human liver chimeric FNRG mice were infected with J6/JFH1 and serum was collected every 3 days before NTBC cycling to perform gradient density fractionation. After 2 weeks, 5 mice were given 10% sucrose in their drinking water for 8 weeks and then sucrose was withdrawn and the experiment was continued for 2 more weeks before killing the animals. At 11 weeks after infection, the mice were fasted overnight before serum collection. PS, presucrose; SC, serum collection; w ± S, weeks ± sucrose; wOS, weeks off sucrose; wPI, weeks postinfection. (A–C) Difference in buoyant density distribution of HCV infectivity between sucrose-fed mice and control mice (no sucrose). Thirteen mice were separated into 2 groups: one group (5 mice) received 10% sucrose in the drinking water at 2 weeks after infection (blue), and the other group received water as a control (red). The blood of infected human liver chimeric FNRG mice was collected at (B) 2, (C) 5, (D) 8, (E) 11, (F) 14, and (G) 17 wPI. Before the 11 wPI blood draw, mice were fasted overnight. HCV particles were separated on a 10%–40% iodixanol gradient. Twelve fractions were collected and HCV infectivity in each fraction was assessed by limiting dilution to determine TCID50/mL. The distribution of infectivity is represented as a percentage of the total as indicated in Figure 4B.
Figure 6Cholesterol and triglyceride content of fractionated mouse serum after 5 weeks of 10% sucrose feeding compared with control. (A and B) Lipoprotein profiles of noninfected human liver chimeric FNRG mice fed 10% sucrose or not in their drinking water were determined by FPLC. The fractions corresponding to the lipoprotein particles noted in the figure were determined by prior analysis of lipoproteins derived from both mouse and human plasma by density gradient centrifugation. (A) Cholesterol and (B) triglyceride (TG) content in each fraction was determined using commercial diagnostic kits (WAKO). (C and D) A total of 50 uL and 100 uL from each fraction of iodixanol were used to measure (C) cholesterol and (D) triglyceride levels, respectively, using a commercial diagnostic kit (Wako). AU, arbitrary unit; IDL, intermediate-density lipoprotein.
Average Infectivity (TCID50/mL) per Fraction for Each Time Point
| Average infectivity (TCID50/mL) | Bleed 1 | Bleed 2 | Bleed 3 | Bleed 4 | Bleed 5 | Bleed 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.6E+04 | 1.6E+04 | 9.8E+03 | 2.7E+02 | 7.2E+02 | 9.2E+02 |
| 2 | 5.6E+05 | 1.6E+04 | 3.9E+04 | 3.2E+03 | 7.5E+03 | 9.5E+02 |
| 3 | 1.9E+05 | 1.7E+04 | 2.4E+04 | 3.6E+03 | 7.4E+03 | 5.0E+03 |
| 4 | 3.6E+04 | 2.6E+03 | 1.1E+04 | 1.9E+03 | 2.6E+03 | 1.9E+03 |
| 5 | 3.7E+03 | 5.1E+02 | 1.3E+04 | 5.3E+02 | 3.7E+03 | 3.6E+03 |
| 6 | 5.1E+03 | 1.4E+03 | 1.7E+04 | 1.6E+02 | 5.0E+03 | 2.5E+03 |
| 7 | 9.9E+03 | 9.6E+03 | 2.9E+04 | 6.2E+01 | 8.1E+02 | 1.9E+03 |
| 8 | 1.5E+04 | 9.3E+03 | 4.4E+04 | 5.1E+02 | 3.2E+02 | 6.3E+02 |
| 9 | 6.1E+03 | 2.1E+02 | 1.2E+03 | 1.4E+02 | 1.8E+02 | 4.3E+02 |
| 10 | 1.4E+03 | 9.6E+01 | 1.3E+03 | 1.0E+00 | 9.4E+01 | ND |
| 11 | 1.1E+02 | 7.1E+01 | 3.8E+01 | 1.0E+00 | ND | ND |
| 12 | 6.5E+01 | 1.0E+01 | 1.1E+03 | 1.0E+00 | ND | ND |
NOTE. TCID50/mL have been averaged for each fraction number.
ND, not determined.
Fraction with the highest density per time point.