Armagan Aytug Yuruk1, Reyhan Nergiz-Unal2. 1. Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, 06100, Ankara, Turkey. 2. Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, 06100, Ankara, Turkey. rnergiz@hacettepe.edu.tr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maternal dietary choices throughout preconception, pregnancy, and lactation irreversibly affect the development of fetal tissues and organs, known as fetal programming. Recommendations tend to emphasize reducing added sugars. However, the impact of maternal dietary free or bound fructose in added sugars on developmental programming of lipogenesis is unknown. METHODS: Virgin Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups. Rats were given feed and plain water (control) or water containing maltodextrin (vehicle), fructose, high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) containing 55% fructose, sucrose (20% w/v) for 12 weeks before mating and throughout the pregnancy and lactation periods. Body weight, water, and feed intake were measured throughout the study. At the end of the lactation period, blood was drawn to determine the fasting levels of glucose, insulin, triglycerides, and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) in blood. Triglycerides and acetyl Co-A Carboxylase-1 (ACC1) levels in livers were analyzed, and insulin resistance was calculated. RESULTS: The energy intake of dams in the HFCS group was higher than in the fructose group, while weight gain was less in the HFCS group than in the fructose group. HFCS resulted in greater insulin resistance in dams, whereas free fructose had a robust effect on the fetal programming of insulin resistance. Free fructose and HFCS in the maternal diet increased blood and liver triglycerides and NEFA content in pups. Furthermore, fructose and HFCS exposure increased phosphorylated ACC1 as compared to maltodextrin and control, indicating greater fatty acid synthesis in pups and dams. CONCLUSION: Different types of added sugar in the maternal diet have different metabolic effects on the developmental programming of lipogenesis. Consequently, high fructose intake via processed foods may increase the risk for chronic diseases, and free fructose might contribute to developmental programming of chronic diseases more than bound fructose.
BACKGROUND: Maternal dietary choices throughout preconception, pregnancy, and lactation irreversibly affect the development of fetal tissues and organs, known as fetal programming. Recommendations tend to emphasize reducing added sugars. However, the impact of maternal dietary free or bound fructose in added sugars on developmental programming of lipogenesis is unknown. METHODS: Virgin Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups. Rats were given feed and plain water (control) or water containing maltodextrin (vehicle), fructose, high-fructosecorn syrup (HFCS) containing 55% fructose, sucrose (20% w/v) for 12 weeks before mating and throughout the pregnancy and lactation periods. Body weight, water, and feed intake were measured throughout the study. At the end of the lactation period, blood was drawn to determine the fasting levels of glucose, insulin, triglycerides, and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) in blood. Triglycerides and acetyl Co-A Carboxylase-1 (ACC1) levels in livers were analyzed, and insulin resistance was calculated. RESULTS: The energy intake of dams in the HFCS group was higher than in the fructose group, while weight gain was less in the HFCS group than in the fructose group. HFCS resulted in greater insulin resistance in dams, whereas free fructose had a robust effect on the fetal programming of insulin resistance. Free fructose and HFCS in the maternal diet increased blood and liver triglycerides and NEFA content in pups. Furthermore, fructose and HFCS exposure increased phosphorylated ACC1 as compared to maltodextrin and control, indicating greater fatty acid synthesis in pups and dams. CONCLUSION: Different types of added sugar in the maternal diet have different metabolic effects on the developmental programming of lipogenesis. Consequently, high fructose intake via processed foods may increase the risk for chronic diseases, and free fructose might contribute to developmental programming of chronic diseases more than bound fructose.
Authors: Reyhan Nergiz-Ünal; Marijke J E Kuijpers; Susanne M de Witt; Sylvia Heeneman; Marion A H Feijge; Sonia C Garcia Caraballo; Erik A L Biessen; Guido R M M Haenen; Judith M E M Cosemans; Johan W M Heemskerk Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2013-01-21 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: Quanhe Yang; Zefeng Zhang; Edward W Gregg; W Dana Flanders; Robert Merritt; Frank B Hu Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Richard J Johnson; Santos E Perez-Pozo; Yuri Y Sautin; Jacek Manitius; Laura Gabriela Sanchez-Lozada; Daniel I Feig; Mohamed Shafiu; Mark Segal; Richard J Glassock; Michiko Shimada; Carlos Roncal; Takahiko Nakagawa Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2009-01-16 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: D David Wang; John L Sievenpiper; Russell J de Souza; Laura Chiavaroli; Vanessa Ha; Adrian I Cozma; Arash Mirrahimi; Matthew E Yu; Amanda J Carleton; Marco Di Buono; Alexandra L Jenkins; Lawrence A Leiter; Thomas M S Wolever; Joseph Beyene; Cyril W C Kendall; David J A Jenkins Journal: J Nutr Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Desiree M Sigala; Bettina Hieronimus; Valentina Medici; Vivien Lee; Marinelle V Nunez; Andrew A Bremer; Chad L Cox; Candice A Price; Yanet Benyam; Abhijit J Chaudhari; Yasser Abdelhafez; John P McGahan; Michael I Goran; Claude B Sirlin; Giovanni Pacini; Andrea Tura; Nancy L Keim; Peter J Havel; Kimber L Stanhope Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-10-21 Impact factor: 6.134