Literature DB >> 23125305

Will PAXgene substitute formalin? A morphological and molecular comparative study using a new fixative system.

Benedetta Belloni1, Chiara Lambertini, Paolo Nuciforo, Jay Phillips, Eric Bruening, Stephane Wong, Reinhard Dummer.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Formalin fixation and paraffin embedding present the standard procedures for conserving clinical tissues for histological analysis. However, molecular analysis is impaired by the cross linking properties of formalin. The PAXgene tissue system (PreAnalytix, Switzerland) is a new formalin-free tissue collection device. AIMS: In this study we aimed to evaluate this new tissue preservation technique in comparison with formalin fixation and fresh frozen tissue samples.
METHODS: 12 melanoma biopsy samples were divided and fixed simultaneously with formalin, PAXgene or fresh frozen in liquid nitrogen and analysed with regard to morphology, immunohistochemistry,  DNA and RNA content and quality. Markers of melanocytic differentiation and tumour cell proliferation were used.
RESULTS: Morphology was well preserved in PAXPE samples. However, 5 out of 11 immunohistochemical markers showed significantly lower overall staining and staining intensity with PAXPE tissues in comparison with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE). Increasing membrane permeability through adding a detergent did proportionally increase staining intensity in PAXPE samples. Amplification of different mRNA amplicons showed a direct relationship with the size of the amplicon with greater template integrity observed in PAXPE samples. Sequencing and mutational analysis of DNA samples were comparable for all the different fixation methods, while the level of DNA fragmentation seemed to be lower in PAXPE compared with FFPE tissues.
CONCLUSIONS: The switch from formalin to PAXgene fixation would require a re-evaluation of immunohistochemical markers and staining procedures originally developed for FFPE tissues. Our data demonstrate that PAXPE fixation offers some advantages concerning molecular analysis. However, these advantages would not justify substituting formalin fixation in any routine pathology laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23125305     DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-200983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  16 in total

1.  Histomorphological and Molecular Assessments of the Fixation Times Comparing Formalin and Ethanol-Based Fixatives.

Authors:  Joon-Yong Chung; Joon Seon Song; Kris Ylaya; John D Sears; Lauren Choi; Hanbyoul Cho; Avi Z Rosenberg; Stephen M Hewitt
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 2.  Biopsies: next-generation biospecimens for tailoring therapy.

Authors:  Mark Basik; Adriana Aguilar-Mahecha; Caroline Rousseau; Zuanel Diaz; Sabine Tejpar; Alan Spatz; Celia M T Greenwood; Gerald Batist
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Effects of short and long-term alcohol-based fixation on Sprague-Dawley rat tissue morphology, protein and nucleic acid preservation.

Authors:  Simona Panzacchi; Federica Gnudi; Daniele Mandrioli; Rita Montella; Valentina Strollo; Bruce Alexander Merrick; Fiorella Belpoggi; Eva Tibaldi
Journal:  Acta Histochem       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  Preanalytical variables and phosphoepitope expression in FFPE tissue: quantitative epitope assessment after variable cold ischemic time.

Authors:  Maria Vassilakopoulou; Fabio Parisi; Summar Siddiqui; Allison M England; Elizabeth R Zarella; Valsamo Anagnostou; Yuval Kluger; David G Hicks; David L Rimm; Veronique M Neumeister
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 5.662

5.  Effect of Antigen Retrieval on Genomic DNA From Immunodissected Samples.

Authors:  Donald J Johann; Ik Jae Shin; Adam Roberge; Sarah Laun; Erich A Peterson; Meei Liu; Matthew A Steliga; Jason Muesse; Michael R Emmert-Buck; Michael A Tangrea
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Next-gen tissue: preservation of molecular and morphological fidelity in prostate tissue.

Authors:  Marc Gillard; Westin R Tom; Tatjana Antic; Gladell P Paner; Mark W Lingen; David J VanderWeele
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 7.  A review of room temperature storage of biospecimen tissue and nucleic acids for anatomic pathology laboratories and biorepositories.

Authors:  Jerry J Lou; Leili Mirsadraei; Desiree E Sanchez; Ryan W Wilson; Maryam Shabihkhani; Gregory M Lucey; Bowen Wei; Elyse J Singer; Sergey Mareninov; William H Yong
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.281

8.  A Buffered Alcohol-Based Fixative for Histomorphologic and Molecular Applications.

Authors:  Candice Perry; Joon-Yong Chung; Kris Ylaya; Chel Hun Choi; Amari Simpson; Kaipo T Matsumoto; William A Smith; Stephen M Hewitt
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 9.  Tissue fixation and the effect of molecular fixatives on downstream staining procedures.

Authors:  William J Howat; Beverley A Wilson
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 10.  Technological considerations for genome-guided diagnosis and management of cancer.

Authors:  Niall J Lennon; Viktor A Adalsteinsson; Stacey B Gabriel
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.