Literature DB >> 11280493

Peritoneal dialysis: better than, equal to, or worse than hemodialysis? Data worth knowing before choosing a dialysis modality.

E Thodis1, P Passadakis, V Vargemezis, D G Oreopoulos.   

Abstract

Technological advances such as those that allow the delivery of an adequate dialysis dose to a larger percentage of patients, minimization of peritoneal membrane damage with more biocompatible solutions, and lower peritonitis rates will undoubtedly improve retention of patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) for longer periods. Currently, only 15% of the world dialysis population is managed by PD. Peritoneal dialysis has many advantages over hemodialysis, and if end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are fully informed about them, the proportion of patients who would prefer this treatment would rise to 25%-30%. An integrated approach to the treatment of ESRD could start with PD in a large percentage of patients, especially those who will receive a kidney transplant within 2 - 3 years. With the present epidemic of ESRD, this approach could lead to a significant saving, relieve the pressure on dialysis units, and allow a larger number of ESRD patients to be treated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11280493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  9 in total

1.  Geographic and temporal trends in peritoneal dialysis services in the United States between 1995 and 2003.

Authors:  Virginia Wang; Shoou-Yih D Lee; Uptal D Patel; Bryan J Weiner; Thomas C Ricketts; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Vancomycin-resistant peritonitis associated with peritoneal dialysis: a cause for concern.

Authors:  A O'Riordan; K A Abraham; J Kee Ho; J J Walshe
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Selection bias explains apparent differential mortality between dialysis modalities.

Authors:  Robert R Quinn; Janet E Hux; Matthew J Oliver; Peter C Austin; Marcello Tonelli; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Patient outcome in primary peritoneal dialysis patients versus those transferred from hemodialysis and transplantation.

Authors:  Iraj Najafi; Mostafa Hosseini; Shahnaz Atabac; Hushang Sanadgol; Nader Nouri Majelan; Shiva Seirafian; Massih Naghibi; Khadigeh Makhdoumi; Fereshteh Saddadi; Tayebeh Soleymanian
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Medicare's New Prospective Payment System on Facility Provision of Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Virginia Wang; Cynthia J Coffman; Linda L Sanders; Shoou-Yih D Lee; Richard A Hirth; Matthew L Maciejewski
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 6.  Icodextrin: a review of its use in peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Perspectives of patients, families, and health care professionals on decision-making about dialysis modality--the good, the bad, and the misunderstandings!

Authors:  Konstadina Griva; Zhi Hui Li; Alden Yuanhong Lai; Meng Chan Choong; Marjorie Wai Yin Foo
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 8.  Extracorporeal versus peritoneal ultrafiltration in diuretic-resistant congestive heart failure--a review.

Authors:  Zofia Wańkowicz; Agnieszka Próchnicka; Anna Olszowska; Daniel Baczyński; Paweł Krzesiński; Mirosław Dziuk
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-12

9.  Therapeutic Challenges to End-Stage Kidney Disease in a Patient with Tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Ken Ohara; Tetsu Akimoto; Takuya Miki; Naoko Otani; Taro Sugase; Takahiro Masuda; Takuya Murakami; Toshimi Imai; Shin-Ichi Takeda; Yasuhiro Ando; Shigeaki Muto; Daisuke Nagata
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Case Rep       Date:  2015-11-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.