Literature DB >> 20947803

Patient and physician predictors of peritoneal dialysis technique failure: a population based, retrospective cohort study.

Mala Chidambaram1, Joanne M Bargman, Robert R Quinn, Peter C Austin, Janet E Hux, Andreas Laupacis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been declining over the past decade in Canada, and high technique failure rates have been implicated. Studies have examined clinical risk factors for PD technique failure, but few studies have addressed sociodemographic factors driving technique failure. There are no studies examining the effect of physician factors on technique failure.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Ontario healthcare databases from 1 April 1995 to 31 March 2005 to examine the effects of patient sociodemographic and physician characteristics on PD technique failure. The primary outcome was time to technique failure. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients experiencing technique failure during the first year and the proportion of patients experiencing death during the study period. A competing risks analysis was applied to the Cox proportional hazards model to determine the predictors of technique failure, death, and kidney transplantation.
RESULTS: In 5162 incident PD patients, the probability of technique success and patient survival at 5 years was 58.2% and 46.9% respectively. Of patients failing PD, 43.5% failed during the first year of treatment. Statistically significant predictors of technique failure included increasing age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.02], diabetes mellitus (HR 1.32), lower neighborhood education level (HR 2.93), and receiving transient (≤ 3 months) hemodialysis before starting PD (HR 1.24). Predictors of patient death included increasing age (HR 1.05), diabetes mellitus (HR 1.44), coronary artery disease (HR 1.26), congestive heart failure (HR 1.58), and late referral to the nephrologist (HR 1.27). Distance from treating dialysis center and residing in a rural area did not impact the risk of technique failure or death. Male physician gender increased the risk of technique failure (HR 1.31). Increased PD patient volume decreased the risk of technique failure (HR 0.98). None of the physician factors were predictors of patient death.
CONCLUSION: These findings support the need for implementing strategies to reduce technique failure, which could include increasing educational resources for patients initiating PD, aggressive risk factor modification in patients with multiple comorbidities, and increasing physician awareness regarding the detrimental outcomes associated with late referral and late PD start.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20947803     DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2010.00096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  39 in total

1.  Dialysis modality after renal transplant failure.

Authors:  Clare Castledine; Fergus J Caskey
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Socioeconomic status and mortality among dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sibei Tao; Xiaoxi Zeng; Jing Liu; Ping Fu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  The Association of Individual and Regional Socioeconomic Status on Initial Peritonitis and Outcomes in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Qin Wang; Ke-Jie Hu; Ye-Ping Ren; Jie Dong; Qing-Feng Han; Tong-Ying Zhu; Jiang-Hua Chen; Hui-Ping Zhao; Meng-Hua Chen; Rong Xu; Yue Wang; Chuan-Ming Hao; Xiao-Hui Zhang; Mei Wang; Na Tian; Hai-Yan Wang
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Predictors and outcomes of transfers from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis.

Authors:  Patrick G Lan; Philip A Clayton; John Saunders; Kevan R Polkinghorne; Paul L Snelling
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 5.  Center-Centered in a Patient-Centered World?

Authors:  Thyago de Moraes; Jeffrey Perl
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 6.  Continuous Quality Improvement Initiatives to Sustainably Reduce Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infections in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Melissa Nataatmadja; Yeoungjee Cho; David W Johnson
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Determinants of peritoneal dialysis technique failure in incident US patients.

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Aya A Mitani; Anjali B Saxena; Benjamin A Goldstein; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  The risk factors and the impact of hernia development on technique survival in peritoneal dialysis patients: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Shang-Feng Yang; Chia-Jen Liu; Wu-Chang Yang; Chao-Fu Chang; Chih-Yu Yang; Szu-Yuan Li; Chih-Ching Lin
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  The impact of transfer from hemodialysis on peritoneal dialysis technique survival.

Authors:  Sharon J Nessim; Joanne M Bargman; S Vanita Jassal; Matthew J Oliver; Yingbo Na; Jeffrey Perl
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Hospitalization Rates for Patients on Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis Compared with In-Center Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Matthew J Oliver; Ahmed A Al-Jaishi; Stephanie N Dixon; Jeffrey Perl; Arsh K Jain; Susan D Lavoie; Danielle M Nash; J Michael Paterson; Charmaine E Lok; Robert R Quinn
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.