Literature DB >> 23123040

Do ion concentrations after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing increase over time? A prospective study.

Harlan C Amstutz1, Patricia A Campbell, Frederick J Dorey, Alicia J Johnson, Anastasia K Skipor, Joshua J Jacobs.   

Abstract

Thirteen male and five female patients received a Conserve Plus hip resurfacing and prospectively provided blood samples to measure cobalt and chromium levels for up to 11 years. Trends in metal levels over time in unilateral and bilateral patients were studied. A multi-variate regression model was used to account for potential covariates. For unilaterals over all time intervals, the median Serum Cobalt level (CoS) was 1.06 μg/L, while the median Serum Chromium level (CrS) was 1.58 μg/L. For bilaterals, the median post operative CoS was 2.80 μg/L, while the median CrS was 5.80 μg/L. Metal levels increased within the first year then decreased and stabilized. These results show that serum metal levels in well-functioning implants can be low and do not increase with time.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23123040     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  Acetabular component thickness does not affect mid-term clinical results in hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Mariam Al-Hamad; Michel J Le Duff; Karren M Takamura; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Are Serum Metal Ion Levels a Concern at Mid-term Followup of Revision Knee Arthroplasty With a Metal-on-metal Hinge Design?

Authors:  Antonio Klasan; Esko Meine; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Turgay Efe; Friedrich Boettner; Thomas Jan Heyse
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Comparison of metal ion levels in patients with hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Craig W Forsthoefel; Nicholas M Brown; Mark L Barba
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-08-31

4.  Evaluation of impingement behaviour in lumbar spinal disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas M Grupp; James J Yue; Rolando Garcia; Christian Kaddick; Bernhard Fritz; Christoph Schilling; Jens Schwiesau; Wilhelm Blömer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Does femoral neck to cup impingement affect metal ion levels in hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Michel J Le Duff; Alicia J Johnson; Andrew J Wassef; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Current indications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty in 2016.

Authors:  Robert Sershon; Rishi Balkissoon; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

7.  Chromium and Nickel Concentrations in Subjects with a Stainless Steel Metal-on-Metal Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Results from a Prospective Longitudinal Study with 7 Years Follow-Up.

Authors:  Vaneet Singh; Anastasia K Skipor; Abdulhafez A Selim; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-31

8.  What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Andrew Judge; Antti Eskelinen; David W Murray; Hemant G Pandit
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.