Literature DB >> 27156368

The characteristics of circular disposable devices and in situ devices for optimizing male circumcision: a network meta-analysis.

Yu Fan1,2, Dehong Cao1, Qiang Wei1, Zhuang Tang1, Ping Tan1, Lu Yang1, Liangren Liu1, Zhenhua Liu1, Xiang Li1, Wenbin Xue1.   

Abstract

In situ device (ISD) and circular disposable device (CDD) are used for optimizing male circumcision (MC), but evidence to explore the characteristics of these two devices is insufficient. In order to explore this issue systematically and provide reliable evidence, ten published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the safety and efficacy of ISDs and CDDs were included (involving 4649 men). Moderate quality of the RCTs included was found after assessment. Pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analyses were processed in stata 13.0 and AIDDS v1.16.6 respectively. According to the outcomes that were statistically significant in both pairwise and network meta-analyses, ISD was found to have less intraoperative blood loss (IB), less operative time (OT) and less incidence of wound bleeding (WB) than conventional circumcision (CC); ISD was found to have less WB but more wound healing time (WHT) than CDD; CDD was found to have less IB and less OT than CC. CDD tended to have the best wound healing condition and least pain experience; ISD tended to have the least IB, least OT, least WB, and highest satisfaction rate. With their own superiorities in many aspects, CDD and ISD are both safe and effective devices for optimizing MC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27156368      PMCID: PMC4860598          DOI: 10.1038/srep25514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  29 in total

1.  Cost Analysis of Adult Male Circumcision with the PrePex Device versus Surgery in Rwanda.

Authors:  Vincent Mutabazi; Jean Paul Bitega; Leon Muyenzi Ngeruka; Jean Pierre Nyemazi; Mary Dain; Steven A Kaplan; Corine Karema; Agnes Binagwaho
Journal:  Urol Nurs       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

2.  Case number and the financial impact of circumcision in reducing prostate cancer.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Jake Waskett; Stefan A Bailis
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of circumcision with Shang Ring vs conventional circumcision.

Authors:  Dehong Cao; Liangren Liu; Yingchun Hu; Jia Wang; Jiuhong Yuan; Qiang Dong; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Rapid, minimally invasive adult voluntary male circumcision: a randomised trial of Unicirc, a novel disposable device.

Authors:  Peter S Millard; Hannah R Wilson; Norman D Goldstuck; Chibuzo Anaso
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  2013-11-20

5.  A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a ring device versus conventional circumcision.

Authors:  Cheng Yue; Yan Ze-Jun; Ke-Rong Wu; Xin-Jun Su; Jia-Sheng Hu; Jian-Wei Ma; Chuan-Min Guo; Hai-Wei Fang; Rui Su; Yao Zhang; Qing-Hua Zhang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Circumcision and the risk of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan L Wright; Daniel W Lin; Janet L Stanford
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Cipriani; Toshiaki A Furukawa; Georgia Salanti; John R Geddes; Julian Pt Higgins; Rachel Churchill; Norio Watanabe; Atsuo Nakagawa; Ichiro M Omori; Hugh McGuire; Michele Tansella; Corrado Barbui
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Shang Ring versus forceps-guided adult male circumcision: a randomized, controlled effectiveness study in southwestern Uganda.

Authors:  Samuel Kanyago; David M Riding; Elichum Mutakooha; Alcides Lopez de la O; Mark J Siedner
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.731

9.  Risk of HIV acquisition among circumcised and uncircumcised young men with penile human papillomavirus infection.

Authors:  Anne F Rositch; Lu Mao; Michael G Hudgens; Stephen Moses; Kawango Agot; Danielle M Backes; Edith Nyagaya; Peter J F Snijders; Chris J L M Meijer; Robert C Bailey; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.177

10.  Safety and efficacy of a novel disposable circumcision device: a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial at 2 centers.

Authors:  Jingen Wang; Yongfei Zhou; Shuxia Xia; Zunwei Zhu; Linghua Jia; Yong Liu; Min Jiang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-03-20
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions: a Cochrane review.

Authors:  Ameer Steven-Jorg Hohlfeld; Sumayyah Ebrahim; Muhammed Zaki Shaik; Tamara Kredo
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 5.969

2.  Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions.

Authors:  Ameer Hohlfeld; Sumayyah Ebrahim; Muhammed Zaki Shaik; Tamara Kredo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 3.  Circumcision and its effects in Africa.

Authors:  Taiwo Akeem Lawal; E Oluwabunmi Olapade-Olaopa
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.