Literature DB >> 23120600

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: comparison of sequential vs. simultaneous presentation of primary tones.

U Ajith Kumar1, Sandeep Maruthy, Vishwakarma Chandrakant.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions are one form of evoked otoacoustic emissions. DPOAEs provide the frequency specific information about the hearing status in mid and high frequency regions. But in most screening protocols TEOAEs are preferred as it requires less time compared to DPOAE. This is because, in DPOAE each stimulus is presented one after the other and responses are analyzed. Grason and Stadler Incorporation 60 (GSI-60) offer simultaneous presentation of four sets of primary tones at a time and checks for the DPOAE. In this mode of presentation, all the pairs are presented at a time and following that response is extracted separately whereas, in sequential mode primaries are presented in orderly fashion one after the other. In this article simultaneous and sequential protocols were used to compare the Distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude, noise floor and administration time in individuals with normal hearing and mild sensori-neural (SN) hearing loss. In simultaneous protocols four sets of primary tones (i.e. 8 tones) were presented together whereas, in sequential presentation mode one set of primary tones was presented each time. Simultaneous protocol was completed in less than half the time required for the completion of sequential protocol. Two techniques yielded similar results at frequencies above 1000 Hz only in normal hearing group. In SN hearing loss group simultaneous presentation yielded signifi cantly higher noise floors and distortion product amplitudes. This result challenges the use of simultaneous presentation technique in neonatal hearing screening programmes and on other pathologies. This discrepancy between two protocols may be due to some changes in biomechanical process in the cochlear and/or due to higher distortion/noise produced by the system during the simultaneous presentation mode.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Otoacoustic emissions; SN hearing loss; Sequential presentation; Simultaneous presentation

Year:  2009        PMID: 23120600      PMCID: PMC3450116          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-009-0030-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  9 in total

1.  Effects of sample size on the noise floor and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  R C Beattie; A Ireland
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  2000

2.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions to single and simultaneous tone pairs.

Authors:  K S Schairer; C Clukey; H J Gould
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: comparison of sequential versus simultaneous presentation of primary-tone pairs.

Authors:  Randall C Beattie
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity.

Authors:  S A Gaskill; A M Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.

Authors:  R Hauser; R Probst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of relative levels of the primary tones on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  R C Beattie; R L Jones
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug

7.  A new method of measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multiple tone pairs: study of human adults.

Authors:  D O Kim; X M Sun; M D Jung; G Leonard
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 8.  The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2 f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans.

Authors:  P Kummer; T Janssen; W Arnold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.840

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions: Body Position Effects with Simultaneous Presentation of Tone Pairs.

Authors:  Samuel R Atcherson; Amy Mattheis
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2011-11-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.