Literature DB >> 23120516

Pediatric cochlear implantation - II: postoperative follow-up.

Anupam Mishra1, Kevin H Franck.   

Abstract

A child with a cochlear implant is expected to achieve the successful outcome of facilitated perception of sound and more oral communication. To achieve this goal, ongoing intervention from a variety of professionals is required. These professionals may represent the disciplines of medicine, audiology, social work, education, and speech / language pathology. In India, cochlear implantation is available in only a few large cities. Here, the otolaryngologist will direct the cochlear implant program. Besides determination of medical candidacy, device implantation and medical management, the otolaryngologist is responsible to ensure that other aspects of cochlear implant management are implemented. This paper, the second of two that describe the multidisciplinary, team approach of the Pediatric Cochlear Implant Program of The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), in Pennsylvania, USA, discusses the non-medical aspects of cochlear implant post-implantation follow-up. The first article, previously published, discussed cochlear implant candidacy. The various speech tests used at CHOP for assessment are based on the English language. They may be translated into the regional Indian languages where the assessment and training can be carried out accordingly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Programming; Speech therapy; Tuning

Year:  2008        PMID: 23120516      PMCID: PMC3450526          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-008-0051-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children.

Authors:  M L Hughes; C J Brown; P J Abbas; A A Wolaver; J P Gervais
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Specific language growth in young children using the CLARION cochlear implant.

Authors:  P M Bollard; P M Chute; A Popp; S C Parisier
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1999-04

3.  Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with the neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M device.

Authors:  K H Franck; S J Norton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  A M Robbins; J J Renshaw; S W Berry
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1991

5.  Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K I Kirk; D B Pisoni; M J Osberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Use of a parent-report scale to assess benefit in children given the Clarion cochlear implant.

Authors:  M J Osberger; L Geier; S Zimmerman-Phillips; M J Barker
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

Review 7.  Objective measurements and the audiological management of cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  J K Shallop
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1997

8.  SAS-CIS preference study in postlingually deafened adults implanted with the CLARION cochlear implant.

Authors:  M J Osberger; L Fisher
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1999-04

9.  Changes in educational placement and speech perception ability after cochlear implantation in children.

Authors:  H Daya; A Ashley; C Gysin; B C Papsin
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  2000-08

10.  Pediatric cochlear implantation-I : Candidacy.

Authors:  Kevin H Franck; Anupam Mishra
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.