Literature DB >> 23120351

Litigation suits in otorhinolaryngology - Areas of concern.

Binaya Kumar Bastia1.   

Abstract

The factors that separate an otolaryngology related law suit from others are manifold. The definition of standard of care, the patient's expectation of a surgical outcome and the psychological consequence that results from the surgical complications are unique to this specially. As this specially deals with one of the most sensitive part of a human body, patient's expectations of any treatment is bound to differ from that of the doctor. Unlike other fields, the definition of standard of care is constantly evolving due to continuous introduction and modification of the techniques and instruments. Statistics shows that the most common allegation in law suits relating to this branch is inadequate consent for the proposed treatment followed by wrong techniques used for operation. Negligence in postoperative care, failure to diagnose early and faulty maintenance of medical words are the other major areas that concern a doctor in a court room. The present article aims at reviewing some major problem areas and addressing the legal aspects concerning those areas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  informed consent; medical negligence; operating note; wrong diagnosis

Year:  2006        PMID: 23120351      PMCID: PMC3450379          DOI: 10.1007/BF03049598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  9 in total

1.  An audit of the quality of operation notes in an otolaryngology unit.

Authors:  N D Bateman; A S Carney; K P Gibbin
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1999-04

2.  Litigation and the lingual nerve.

Authors:  Daniel D Lydiatt
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Consent--who, what, where, when?

Authors:  K Haddow; J A Crowther
Journal:  Health Bull (Edinb)       Date:  2000-05

4.  Cancer of the oral cavity and medical malpractice.

Authors:  Daniel D Lydiatt
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Medicolegal analysis of injury during endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Alastair G Lynn-Macrae; Rebecca A Lynn-Macrae; Janaki Emani; Robert C Kern; David B Conley
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Informed consent: patients' and junior doctors' perceptions of the consent procedure.

Authors:  D J Houghton; S Williams; J D Bennett; G Back; A S Jones
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1997-12

7.  Informed consent for interventional radiology procedures: a survey detailing current European practice.

Authors:  H M O'Dwyer; S M Lyon; T Fotheringham; M J Lee
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2003-07-10       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Medical malpractice and facial nerve paralysis.

Authors:  Daniel D Lydiatt
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-01

Review 9.  Validity of consent--a review of statutes.

Authors:  Binaya K Bastia; Ajee Kuruvilla; K M Saralaya
Journal:  Indian J Med Sci       Date:  2005-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.