Literature DB >> 15280732

Medicolegal analysis of injury during endoscopic sinus surgery.

Alastair G Lynn-Macrae1, Rebecca A Lynn-Macrae, Janaki Emani, Robert C Kern, David B Conley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To survey the causes, characteristics, and outcomes of malpractice litigation resulting from injuries sustained during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of United States state and federal civil litigation involving injuries resulting from ESS.
METHODS: Sources were state and federal court decisions and jury verdict reports accessed through a computerized legal database. The 41 cases were decided or settled between 1990 and 2003. The cases and reports were analyzed for pertinent data regarding plaintiffs, defendants, allegations of wrongdoing, resulting injury, expert witnesses, and resulting verdict or settlement. Correlation between severity of injury and case outcome was analyzed.
RESULTS: All suits reviewed involved ESS. Many cases included multiple causes of action, or types of malpractice, including negligent technique, 31 (76%); lack of informed consent, 15 (37%); and wrongful death, 2 (5%). The defendant-physician specialty was overwhelmingly otolaryngology, 40 (98%). The most common presenting complaint, or indication for surgery, was chronic sinusitis, 30 (73%). The injuries caused by surgery were frequently multiple, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, 10 (24%); brain damage, 6 (15%); diplopia, 7 (17%); and death, 2 (5%). The majority of cases reviewed (83%) resulted in a verdict rather than settlement. The result of the verdict or settlement was 17 (41%) in favor of the plaintiff, 23 (56%) in favor of the defendant, and 1 (2%) unknown. The average award was 751,275 dollars, with a median of 410,239 dollars and a range of 61,000 dollars to 2,870,000 dollars.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to review malpractice litigation resulting from injuries sustained during ESS and shows a hitherto unexpected pattern between severity of injury and case outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15280732     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200408000-00032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  7 in total

Review 1.  Risks and medico-legal aspects of endoscopic sinus surgery: a review.

Authors:  M Re; G Magliulo; R Romeo; F M Gioacchini; E Pasquini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Danger points, complications and medico-legal aspects in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  W Hosemann; C Draf
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

3.  Otorhinolaryngology litigations in Japan.

Authors:  Toru Hiyama
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Esophageal perforation and rupture: a comprehensive medicolegal examination of 59 jury verdicts and settlements.

Authors:  Peter F Svider; Anna A Pashkova; Gian-Paul Vidal; Andrew C Mauro; Jean Anderson Eloy; Ravi J Chokshi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Litigation suits in otorhinolaryngology - Areas of concern.

Authors:  Binaya Kumar Bastia
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-10

6.  A proposal for limited criminal liability in high-accuracy endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  P Voultsos; M Casini; G Ricci; V Tambone; E Midolo; A G Spagnolo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Analysis of Factors Associated With Rhytidectomy Malpractice Litigation Cases.

Authors:  Aron Kandinov; Sean Mutchnick; Vaibhuv Nangia; Peter F Svider; Giancarlo F Zuliani; Mahdi A Shkoukani; Michael A Carron
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.611

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.