Literature DB >> 9466060

Informed consent: patients' and junior doctors' perceptions of the consent procedure.

D J Houghton1, S Williams, J D Bennett, G Back, A S Jones.   

Abstract

The important task of obtaining informed consent is often left to the most junior member of the surgical team, whose understanding of the surgical procedures involved may be limited. Little is known about patients' and junior doctors' satisfaction with the consent procedure, which was studied with the use of questionnaires. The vast majority of patients (95%) were satisfied with the explanation given to them prior to obtaining consent although 45% thought that the doctor who signed the consent form would be performing the surgery. Thirty-seven per cent of the junior doctors questioned admitted to obtaining consent for procedures of which they had little understanding. The majority of both junior doctors and patients felt that the surgeon performing surgery should sign the consent form. Junior doctors cannot be expected to obtain informed consent for procedures they do not fully understand and patients's; expectations must be taken into consideration if the seemingly inexorable rise in medico-legal litigation is to be halted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship; Royal Liverpool University Hospital

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9466060     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.1997.00059.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci        ISSN: 0307-7772


  10 in total

Review 1.  Risks and medico-legal aspects of endoscopic sinus surgery: a review.

Authors:  M Re; G Magliulo; R Romeo; F M Gioacchini; E Pasquini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  'All by myself': interns' reports of their experiences taking consent in Irish hospitals.

Authors:  Roisin M Heaney; Michael Murray; Aine M Heaney; Eva M Doherty
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Clinicians' knowledge of informed consent.

Authors:  Lisa Fisher-Jeffes; Charlotte Barton; Fiona Finlay
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Litigation suits in otorhinolaryngology - Areas of concern.

Authors:  Binaya Kumar Bastia
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-10

5.  A comparison of the views of patients and medical staff in relation to the process of informed consent.

Authors:  M G Berry; Jennifer Unwin; G L Ross; Elizabeth Peacock; A Juma
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Content, accuracy and completeness of patient consent in a regional vascular surgery unit.

Authors:  D McGrogan; D Mark; B Lee; M E O'Donnell
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Using video-taped examples of standardized patient to teach medical students taking informed consent.

Authors:  Shirin Habibi Khorasani; Sedigheh Ebrahimi
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2015-04

8.  Consenting operative orthopaedic trauma patients: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Amin Kheiran; Purnajyoti Banerjee; Philip Stott
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2014-02-06

9.  Use of abbreviations in consent forms for orthopaedic surgery: A pilot study.

Authors:  M Noah H Khan; Hassan Shafiq; Muhammad Waqas Ilyas; Muhammad Hamzah Jamshed; Ammal Imran Qureshi; Basharat Ghafoor Khan; Neshat Anjum
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-10-15

10.  Preoperative informed consent: is it truly informed?

Authors:  M Jawaid; M Farhan; Z Masood; Smn Husnain
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.429

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.