Literature DB >> 3522781

Pneumatic nasal catheters: advantages and drawbacks.

S Elwany, T Kamel, A Mekhamer.   

Abstract

The authors present their experience with pneumatic nasal catheters in cases of epistaxis. Among the advantages of this method over tamponade with petroleum jelly-covered gauze are: Effective tamponade without causing hypoxia, carbon dioxide retention or additional loading of the cardiopulmonary system; Less need for sedation; and Easy application and removal. Conversely, its most important adverse effect is the possibility of pressure necrosis of the nasal mucosa and nasal septum. This can be greatly reduced by considering a few technical recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3522781     DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100099837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  2 in total

1.  Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation for refractory posterior epistaxis.

Authors:  A Thakar; C J Sharan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-10

2.  Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation for refractory posterior epistaxis.

Authors:  Alok Thakar; Cj Sharan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.