Karl Verpoort1, Thomas M Möhler. 1. Gemeinschaftspraxis für Hämatologie/Onkologie, Ärzte für Innere Medizin - Schwerpunkte Hämatologie und Onkologie, Ballindamm 3, 20095 Hamburg Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the severity of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Biosimilar G-CSF is now approved for use, based on comparable efficacy, safety and quality with the originator product. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients' charts following the switch from originator G-CSF (Neupogen(®)) to biosimilar G-CSF (Zarzio(®)/Filgrastim Hexal(®)) in a large community oncology practice. A total of 77 consecutive patients with cancer who received biosimilar G-CSF were reviewed, as were 25 patients who received originator G-CSF at the same centre. RESULTS: The median age of patients in the biosimilar G-CSF cohort was 67 years (range 20-83). In this cohort 48% had chemotherapy with a febrile neutropenia risk of >20%. Biosimilar G-CSF was given as primary prophylaxis in 52% and as secondary prophylaxis in 48% of patients. Age and febrile neutropenia in medical history or in previous chemotherapy were factors that triggered the use of G-CSF in patients with a febrile neutropenia risk of <20%. One patient developed febrile neutropenia. Neutropenia led to chemotherapy dose reductions in five patients (6.5%) and discontinuation in two patients (2.5%). No unexpected safety findings were observed. Patient characteristics were generally similar in the originator G-CSF cohort. Only 24% of patients had a febrile neutropenia risk >20% and 36% received primary prophylactic G-CSF. One patient developed febrile neutropenia. Neutropenia led to chemotherapy dose reductions in two patients (8%) and discontinuation in two patients (8%). CONCLUSIONS: Biosimilar G-CSF was effective and prevented dose reductions/discontinuation in the majority of patients. Biosimilar G-CSF was considered clinically comparable to its reference product.
OBJECTIVES: Prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the severity of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Biosimilar G-CSF is now approved for use, based on comparable efficacy, safety and quality with the originator product. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients' charts following the switch from originator G-CSF (Neupogen(®)) to biosimilar G-CSF (Zarzio(®)/Filgrastim Hexal(®)) in a large community oncology practice. A total of 77 consecutive patients with cancer who received biosimilar G-CSF were reviewed, as were 25 patients who received originator G-CSF at the same centre. RESULTS: The median age of patients in the biosimilar G-CSF cohort was 67 years (range 20-83). In this cohort 48% had chemotherapy with a febrile neutropenia risk of >20%. Biosimilar G-CSF was given as primary prophylaxis in 52% and as secondary prophylaxis in 48% of patients. Age and febrile neutropenia in medical history or in previous chemotherapy were factors that triggered the use of G-CSF in patients with a febrile neutropenia risk of <20%. One patient developed febrile neutropenia. Neutropenia led to chemotherapy dose reductions in five patients (6.5%) and discontinuation in two patients (2.5%). No unexpected safety findings were observed. Patient characteristics were generally similar in the originator G-CSF cohort. Only 24% of patients had a febrile neutropenia risk >20% and 36% received primary prophylactic G-CSF. One patient developed febrile neutropenia. Neutropenia led to chemotherapy dose reductions in two patients (8%) and discontinuation in two patients (8%). CONCLUSIONS: Biosimilar G-CSF was effective and prevented dose reductions/discontinuation in the majority of patients. Biosimilar G-CSF was considered clinically comparable to its reference product.
Authors: M S Aapro; J Bohlius; D A Cameron; Lissandra Dal Lago; J Peter Donnelly; N Kearney; G H Lyman; R Pettengell; V C Tjan-Heijnen; J Walewski; Damien C Weber; C Zielinski Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2010-11-20 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: P Gascon; U Fuhr; F Sörgel; M Kinzig-Schippers; A Makhson; S Balser; S Einmahl; M Muenzberg Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: D Almenar; J Mayans; O Juan; J M Garcia Bueno; J I Jalon Lopez; A Frau; M Guinot; P Cerezuela; E Garcia Buscalla; J A Gasquet; J Sanchez Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2008-12-08 Impact factor: 2.520
Authors: Pere Gascón; Matti Aapro; Heinz Ludwig; Carsten Bokemeyer; Mario Boccadoro; Matthew Turner; Kris Denhaerynck; Karen MacDonald; Ivo Abraham Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Fritz Sörgel; Arnd Schwebig; Johann Holzmann; Stefan Prasch; Pritibha Singh; Martina Kinzig Journal: BioDrugs Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 5.807
Authors: Pere Gascón; Hans Tesch; Karl Verpoort; Maria Sofia Rosati; Nello Salesi; Samir Agrawal; Nils Wilking; Helen Barker; Michael Muenzberg; Matthew Turner Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Dae Hyun Yoo; Nenad Prodanovic; Janusz Jaworski; Pedro Miranda; Edgar Ramiterre; Allan Lanzon; Asta Baranauskaite; Piotr Wiland; Carlos Abud-Mendoza; Boycho Oparanov; Svitlana Smiyan; HoUng Kim; Sang Joon Lee; SuYeon Kim; Won Park Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Won Park; Dae Hyun Yoo; Pedro Miranda; Marek Brzosko; Piotr Wiland; Sergio Gutierrez-Ureña; Helena Mikazane; Yeon-Ah Lee; Svitlana Smiyan; Mie-Jin Lim; Vladimir Kadinov; Carlos Abud-Mendoza; HoUng Kim; Sang Joon Lee; YunJu Bae; SuYeon Kim; Jürgen Braun Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2016-04-26 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Sophie Nahon; Mansour Rastkhah; Meher Ben Abdelghani; Ravaka-Fatoma Soumoudronga; Isabelle Gasnereau; Jean-Luc Labourey Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 3.359