Literature DB >> 16492793

Are shorter courses of filgrastim prophylaxis associated with increased risk of hospitalization?

Derek Weycker1, James Hackett, John S Edelsberg, Gerry Oster, Andrew G Glass.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In clinical trials in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy, 10-11 days of prophylaxis with filgrastim has been found to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia. In clinical practice, however, many patients receive shorter courses of therapy, even though the effectiveness of this regimen is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between duration of filgrastim prophylaxis and risk of hospitalization in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), breast cancer, or lung cancer.
METHODS: Using a large, automated, US healthcare claims database, we identified all adults who received chemotherapy for NHL, breast cancer, or lung cancer between 1998 and 2002. For these patients, we identified their first course of chemotherapy and each unique cycle within that course. We then focused attention on all patient cycles in which filgrastim was administered on or before cycle day 5 (filgrastim prophylaxis). Pooling all such cycles, we examined the relationship between duration of filgrastim prophylaxis and risk of hospitalization for neutropenia or infection and risk of hospitalization for any reason, using generalized estimating equations.
RESULTS: Mean +/- SD duration of filgrastim prophylaxis was 6.5 +/- 3.1 days across 332 cycles for 133 NHL patients, 6.1 +/- 2.9 days across 482 cycles for 205 breast cancer patients, and 4.3 +/- 3.1 days across 522 cycles for 260 lung cancer patients. In multivariate analyses, risk of hospitalization for neutropenia or infection was found to decline with each additional day of filgrastim prophylaxis for patients with NHL (OR 0.81; p = 0.003), breast cancer (OR 0.77; p = 0.001), and lung cancer (OR 0.91; p = 0.084). Risk reductions with each additional day of prophylaxis ranged from 15% to 19% for patients with NHL, 17% to 23% for those with breast cancer, and 8% to 9% for those with lung cancer. Similar reductions in risk were noted for all-cause hospitalization.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with NHL, breast cancer, or lung cancer, shorter courses of filgrastim prophylaxis may increase the risk of hospitalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16492793     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1G516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  28 in total

Review 1.  What do prescribers think of biosimilars?

Authors:  M S Aapro
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in a Canadian outpatient setting.

Authors:  S Fine; M Koo; T Gill; M Marin; M Poulin-Costello; R Barron; N Mittmann
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: where are we now?

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Jeffrey Crawford; Didier Kamioner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Burden of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Hospitalizations in US Clinical Practice, by Use and Patterns of Prophylaxis with Colony-Stimulating Factor.

Authors:  Derek Weycker; Xiaoyan Li; Spiros Tzivelekis; Mark Atwood; Jacob Garcia; Yanli Li; Maureen Reiner; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Time trends in utilization of G-CSF prophylaxis and risk of febrile neutropenia in a Medicare population receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Ravi K Goyal; Spiros Tzivelekis; Kenneth J Rothman; Sean D Candrilli; James A Kaye
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Chemotherapy treatment patterns and neutropenia management in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha; Javier Gallego Plazas; Laurent Mineur; Tomas Salek; Alain Hendlisz; Lucy DeCosta; Florian D Vogl; Rodolfo Passalacqua
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  G-CSF use in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) as observed in clinical practice in Italy.

Authors:  Umberto Vitolo; Francesco Angrili; Lucy DeCosta; Sally Wetten; Massimo Federico
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Treatment patterns and outcomes in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia with biosimilar filgrastim (the MONITOR-GCSF study).

Authors:  Pere Gascón; Matti Aapro; Heinz Ludwig; Carsten Bokemeyer; Mario Boccadoro; Matthew Turner; Kris Denhaerynck; Karen MacDonald; Ivo Abraham
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) patterns of use in cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Authors:  Mi Rim Choi; Craig A Solid; Victoria M Chia; Anne H Blaes; John H Page; Richard Barron; Thomas J Arneson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors as prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Sol Cortés de Miguel; Miguel Ángel Calleja-Hernández; Salomón Menjón-Beltrán; Inmaculada Vallejo-Rodríguez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.