Literature DB >> 26306517

Treatment patterns and outcomes in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia with biosimilar filgrastim (the MONITOR-GCSF study).

Pere Gascón1, Matti Aapro2, Heinz Ludwig3, Carsten Bokemeyer4, Mario Boccadoro5, Matthew Turner6, Kris Denhaerynck7, Karen MacDonald7, Ivo Abraham8,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to examine the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia (chemotherapy-induced (CIN)/febrile neutropenia (FN)) prophylaxis with biosimilar filgrastim (Zarzio®).
METHODS: MONITOR-GCSF is an international (12 countries), multi-center (140), prospective (max. six cycles), observational, open-label, pharmaco-epidemiologic study of cancer patients (n = 1447) treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy across a total of 6,213 cycles and receiving prophylaxis with Zarzio®. Data were analyzed using both the patient and cycle as unit of analysis.
RESULTS: Most (72.3 %) received primary prophylaxis; dosed mainly (53.2 %) at 30 MIU but differentiated by weight, chemotoxicity, and tumor type; and mainly (53.2 %) initiated in the 24-72h post-chemotherapy window but differentiated by prophylaxis type, tumor type, and chemotoxicity and for modal/median duration of 5 days. Relative to European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines, 56.6 % were correctly prophylacted, 17.4 % under-prophylacted, and 26.0 % over-prophylacted. The following incidence rates were recorded: CIN grade 4 13.2 % of patients and 3.9 % of cycles, FN 5.9 % of patients and 1.4 % of cycles, CIN/FN-related hospitalizations 6.1 % of patients and 1.5 % of cycles, CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbances 9.5 % of patients and 2.8 % of cycles, and composite outcomes index 22.3 % of patients and 6.7 % of cycles. Rates varied by type of prophylaxis and tumor, chemotoxicity, initiation day, and prophylaxis duration. There were 1834 musculoskeletal events with 24.7 % of patients reporting bone pain of any grade (mostly mild to moderate), and 148 adverse drug reactions, including 4 serious, were recorded in 76 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and safety outcomes are well within the range of historically reported data for originator filgrastim underscoring the clinical effectiveness and safety of biosimilar filgrastim in daily clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biosimilar; Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; Febrile neutropenia; Filgrastim; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; Prophylaxis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26306517     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2861-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  30 in total

1.  Update on the MONITOR-GCSF study of biosimilar filgrastim to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients: Protocol amendments.

Authors:  Pere Gascón; Matti Aapro; Heinz Ludwig; Nadia Rosencher; M Boccadoro; Matthew Turner; Karen MacDonald; Michael Muenzberg; Ivo Abraham
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 2.  Clinical safety of biosimilar recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factors.

Authors:  Ivo Abraham; Soba Tharmarajah; Karen MacDonald
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 4.250

3.  Potential cost savings from chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with biosimilar filgrastim and expanded access to targeted antineoplastic treatment across the European Union G5 countries: a simulation study.

Authors:  Diana Sun; Tri Murti Andayani; Ahmed Altyar; Karen MacDonald; Ivo Abraham
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 4.  Febrile neutropenia: a critical review of the initial management.

Authors:  Jean Klastersky; Ahmad Awada; Mariane Paesmans; Mickael Aoun
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 5.  The colony-stimulating factors: use to prevent and treat neutropenia and its complications.

Authors:  Rami S Komrokji; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.388

6.  Observational study of the prevalence of febrile neutropenia in patients who received filgrastim or pegfilgrastim associated with 3-4 week chemotherapy regimens in community oncology practices.

Authors:  Vicki A Morrison; Mitchell Wong; Dawn Hershman; Luis T Campos; Beiying Ding; Jennifer Malin
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2007-05

Review 7.  Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  The impact of the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on chemotherapy dose intensity and cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  G H Lyman; D C Dale; E Culakova; M S Poniewierski; D A Wolff; N M Kuderer; M Huang; J Crawford
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 9.  Clinical experience with Zarzio® in Europe: what have we learned?

Authors:  Pere Gascón; Hans Tesch; Karl Verpoort; Maria Sofia Rosati; Nello Salesi; Samir Agrawal; Nils Wilking; Helen Barker; Michael Muenzberg; Matthew Turner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Biosimilar granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor for healthy donor stem cell mobilization: need we be afraid?

Authors:  Halvard Bonig; Petra S Becker; Arnd Schwebig; Matthew Turner
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.157

View more
  21 in total

1.  Safety Profile of Biosimilar Filgrastim (Zarzio/Zarxio): A Combined Analysis of Phase III Studies.

Authors:  Nadia Harbeck; Pere Gascón; Andriy Krendyukov; Nadja Hoebel; Sreekanth Gattu; Kimberly Blackwell
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-01-09

2.  Efficacy and safety of biosimilar filgrastim in primary and secondary prevention of febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Leszek Kraj; Joanna Krawczyk-Lipiec; Joanna Górniewska; Grzegorz Orlik
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2017-07-04

3.  Risk assessment of febrile neutropenia and evaluation of G-CSF use in patients with cancer: a real-life study.

Authors:  Elif Aras; Aygin Bayraktar-Ekincioglu; Saadettin Kilickap
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Neuroprotection through G-CSF: recent advances and future viewpoints.

Authors:  Vikrant Rahi; Sumit Jamwal; Puneet Kumar
Journal:  Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.024

5.  Outcomes of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia prophylaxis with biosimilar filgrastim (Zarzio®) initiated "same-day" (< 24 h), "per-guidelines" (24-72 h), and "late" (> 72 h): findings from the MONITOR-GCSF study.

Authors:  Heinz Ludwig; Pere Gascón; Carsten Bokemeyer; Matti Aapro; Mario Boccadoro; Kris Denhaerynck; Andriy Krendyukov; Karen MacDonald; Ivo Abraham
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  The Comparison of The Efficacy and Safety of Original and Biosimilar Filgrastim in Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Children with Cancer.

Authors:  Mustafa Buyukavci; Zuhal Keskin Yildirim
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2019-06

7.  Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving biosimilar filgrastim for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced/febrile neutropaenia: Results from the MONITOR-GCSF study.

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Andriy Krendyukov; Nadja Höbel; Pere Gascon
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.328

Review 8.  Refining the role of pegfilgrastim (a long-acting G-CSF) for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: consensus guidance recommendations.

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Ralph Boccia; Robert Leonard; Carlos Camps; Mario Campone; Sylvain Choquet; Marco Danova; John Glaspy; Iwona Hus; Hartmut Link; Thamer Sliwa; Hans Tesch; Vicente Valero
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Over- and under-prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia relative to evidence-based guidelines is associated with differences in outcomes: findings from the MONITOR-GCSF study.

Authors:  Carsten Bokemeyer; Pere Gascón; Matti Aapro; Heinz Ludwig; Mario Boccadoro; Kris Denhaerynck; Michael Gorray; Andriy Krendyukov; Ivo Abraham; Karen MacDonald
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Randomized, double-blind study comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer.

Authors:  Nadia Harbeck; Oleg Lipatov; Mona Frolova; Dmitry Udovitsa; Eldar Topuzov; Doina Elena Ganea-Motan; Roumen Nakov; Pritibha Singh; Anita Rudy; Kimberly Blackwell
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.404

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.