| Literature DB >> 23118741 |
Yong Zhong1, Jun Wang, Ping Gu, Jiaqing Shao, Bin Lu, Shisen Jiang.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of ezetimibe on the insulin secretion in db/db mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23118741 PMCID: PMC3483710 DOI: 10.1155/2012/420854
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Diabetes Res ISSN: 1687-5214
Figure 1Effect of on IPGTT in db/db mice with diabetes. Compared with db/db, ezetimibe provided an improvement of glucose tolerance and first-phase insulin response. *P < 0.05.
Figure 2In vitro perfusion of pancreatic islets in different groups. (a), db/db; (b), db/m; (c), ezetimibe. Ezetimibe improved first-phase insulin response when compared with db/db, but the insulin response was still lower than db/m.
Figure 3Immunohistochemistry for insulin in the pancreatic islets of three groups. Representative immunostaining for insulin performed with pancreatic tissue sections derived from db/m mice, placebo-treated db/db mice, and ezetimibe-treated db/db mice.
Figure 4Content of β cells and staining intensity in three groups. (a) β-Cell mass was calculated by the following formula: islet β-cell mass (mg) = (the area stained by insulin antibody)/(the area of the whole pancreatic)∗(pancreas weight). (b) Insulin expression level was analyzed semiquantitatively. *P < 0.05.
Comparison of β cell amount and stain intensity among three groups.
| Group |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| db/m control ( | 14.23 ± 2.45* | 100* |
| db/db control ( | 8.36 ± 1.53 | 64.21 ± 7.21 |
| Ezetimibe group ( | 12.10 ± 2.55* | 83.36 ± 8.45* |
Versus db/db control mice, *P < 0.05.
(a)
| Group |
| Body weight (g) | FBG (mmol/L) | FSI (ug/L) | TC (mmol/L) | LDL-C (mmol/L) | ISI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| db/m | Baseline 20 | 29.10 ± 0.33* | 5.51 ± 0.53* | 2.43 ± 0.23* | 2.65 ± 0.41* | 1.65 ± 0.22* | −2.58 ± 0.15 |
| Terminal 20 | 35.80 ± 0.54* | 5.71 ± 0.63* | 2.63 ± 0.31* | 2.55 ± 0.53* | 1.79 ± 0.27* | −2.69 ± 0.19 | |
|
| |||||||
| db/db | Baseline 20 | 41.20 ± 3.18 | 17.30 ± 3.99 | 8.51 ± 1.26 | 5.14 ± 0.80 | 3.88 ± 0.44 | −4.95 ± 0.32 |
| Terminal 20 | 50.20 ± 4.32 | 25.9 ± 2.00 | 9.55 ± 1.20 | 5.86 ± 0.85 | 4.91 ± 0.37 | −5.49 ± 0.20 | |
|
| |||||||
| Ezetimibe | Baseline 20 | 40.92 ± 2.84 | 18.37 ± 4.25 | 9.01 ± 1.37 | 5.30 ± 0.77 | 3.69 ± 0.74 | −5.07 ± 0.34 |
| Terminal 20 | 45.40 ± 3.81* | 18.82 ± 3.99* | 7.58 ± 0.67* | 4.21 ± 0.63* | 2.78 ± 0.62* | −4.38 ± 0.24 | |
Note: db/m: db/m mice without diabetes; db/db: untreated db/db mice with diabetes; ezetimibe: ezetimibe-treated db/db mice with diabetes; *P < 0.05 untreated db/db mice versus treated db/db control mice.
(b)
| Group |
| TG (mmol/L) | FFA (mmol/L) | HbA1c (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| db/m | Baseline 20 | 1.03 ± 0.22* | 2.52 ± 0.39* | 5.18 ± 1.21* |
| Terminal 20 | 0.93 ± 0.27* | 2.58 ± 0.48* | 4.99 ± 1.03* | |
|
| ||||
| db/db | Baseline 20 | 1.99 ± 0.74 | 3.23 ± 0.87 | 8.80 ± 2.54 |
| Terminal 20 | 2.28 ± 0.49 | 3.74 ± 0.89 | 11.46 ± 2.87 | |
|
| ||||
| Ezetimibe | Baseline 20 | 2.18 ± 0.45 | 3.35 ± 0.84 | 9.08 ± 2.67 |
| Terminal 20 | 1.50 ± 0.74* | 2.88 ± 0.53* | 9.77 ± 2.60* | |
Note: db/m: db/m mice without diabetes; db/db: untreated db/db mice with diabetes; ezetimibe: ezetimibe-treated db/db mice with diabetes; *P < 0.05 untreated db/db mice versus treated db/db control mice.