Literature DB >> 23117477

Correlation between three assay systems for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) determination.

Hang Wun Raymond Li1, Ernest Hung Yu Ng, Benancy Po Chau Wong, Richard A Anderson, Pak Chung Ho, William Shu Biu Yeung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is becoming of recognized importance in reproductive medicine, but assays are not standardized. We have evaluated the correlation between the new Gen II ELISA kit (Beckman-Coutler) and the older ELISA kits by Immunotech (IOT) and Diagnostic Systems Laboratories (DSL).
METHODS: A total of 56 archived serum samples from patients with subfertility or reproductive endocrine disorders were retrieved and assayed in duplicate using the three AMH ELISA kits . The samples covered a wide range of AMH concentrations (1.9 to 142.5 pmol/L).
RESULTS: We observed good correlations between the new (AMH Gen II) and old AMH assay kits by IOT and DSL (R(2) = 0.971 and 0.930 respectively). The regression equations were AMH (Gen II) = 1.353 × AMH (IOT) + 0.051 and AMH (Gen II) = 1.223 × AMH (DSL) - 1.270 respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: AMH concentrations using the Gen II kit are slightly higher than those from the IOT and DSL kits. Standardization of assay results worldwide is urgently required but this analysis facilitates the interpretation of values obtained historically and in future studies using any of the 3 assays available. Meanwhile, adapting clinical cut-offs from previously published work by direct conversion is not recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23117477      PMCID: PMC3528883          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-012-9880-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  21 in total

Review 1.  AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S L Broer; M Dólleman; B C Opmeer; B C Fauser; B W Mol; F J M Broekmans
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 15.610

2.  Measurement of anti-mullerian hormone by Beckman Coulter ELISA and DSL ELISA in assisted reproduction: differences between serum and follicular fluid.

Authors:  Nick A Bersinger; Dorothea Wunder; Martin H Birkhäuser; Jean Guibourdenche
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  Serum anti-Müllerian hormone and FSH: prediction of live birth and extremes of response in stimulated cycles--implications for individualization of therapy.

Authors:  Scott M Nelson; Robin W Yates; Richard Fleming
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  A multicentre evaluation of the new Beckman Coulter anti-Mullerian hormone immunoassay (AMH Gen II).

Authors:  A M Wallace; S A Faye; R Fleming; S M Nelson
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.057

Review 5.  The journey from the old to the new AMH assay: how to avoid getting lost in the values.

Authors:  S M Nelson; A La Marca
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.828

6.  Anti-mullerian hormone and cumulative pregnancy outcome in in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Suresh Kini; H W Raymond Li; Dave Morrell; Sue Pickering; K Joo Thong
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Development of a second generation anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) ELISA.

Authors:  Ajay Kumar; Bhanu Kalra; Amita Patel; Lauren McDavid; William E Roudebush
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 8.  The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count.

Authors:  Simone L Broer; Ben Willem J Mol; Dave Hendriks; Frank J M Broekmans
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Anti-Müllerian hormone as a predictor of IVF outcome.

Authors:  Dharmawijaya N Lekamge; Michael Barry; Michele Kolo; Michelle Lane; Robert B Gilchrist; Kelton P Tremellen
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.828

10.  Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH): what do we still need to know?

Authors:  A La Marca; F J Broekmans; A Volpe; B C Fauser; N S Macklon
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  19 in total

1.  The role of serum AMH and FF AMH in predicting pregnancy outcome in the fresh cycle of IVF/ICSI: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingnv Yao; Wei Zhang; Hong Li; Wenqin Lin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

2.  Anti-Mullerian hormone normogram in an Irish subfertile population.

Authors:  M N Naasan; C Harrity; L Pentony; E Mocanu
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Anti-Müllerian hormone as a diagnostic tool for ovarian remnant syndrome in bitches.

Authors:  Özge Turna Yilmaz; Tuğba Seval Fatma Toydemir; Ismail Kirsan; Zeynep Gunay Ucmak; Esra Caliskan Karacam
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.459

4.  Ovarian biomarkers predict controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilisation treatment in Singapore.

Authors:  Ryan Wai Kheong Lee; Lay Wai Khin; Marianne Sybille Hendricks; Heng Hao Tan; Sadhana Nadarajah; Nancy Wen Sim Tee; Seong-Feei Loh; Bee Choo Tai; Jerry Ky Chan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  BRCA1 germline mutations may be associated with reduced ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Erica T Wang; Margareta D Pisarska; Catherine Bresee; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Jenny Lester; Yalda Afshar; Carolyn Alexander; Beth Y Karlan
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  Anti-Müllerian hormone as a marker of ovarian reserve: What have we learned, and what should we know?

Authors:  Akira Iwase; Tomoko Nakamura; Satoko Osuka; Sachiko Takikawa; Maki Goto; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-23

7.  Comparability of antimüllerian hormone levels among commercially available immunoassays.

Authors:  H Irene Su; Mary D Sammel; Michael V Homer; Kim Bui; Carolyn Haunschild; Frank Z Stanczyk
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Baseline AMH Level Associated With Ovulation Following Ovulation Induction in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Richard S Legro; Michael P Diamond; Christos Coutifaris; Anne Z Steiner; William D Schlaff; Ruben Alvero; Gregory M Christman; Peter R Casson; Hao Huang; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Heping Zhang; Marcelle I Cedars
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Optimal cutoff value of basal anti-mullerian hormone in iranian infertile women for prediction of ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome and poor response to stimulation.

Authors:  Malek Mansour Aghssa; Azam Manshadi Tarafdari; Ensieh Shahrokh Tehraninejad; Mohammad Ezzati; Maryam Bagheri; Zahra Panahi; Saeed Mahdavi; Mehrshad Abbasi
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 10.  Challenges in Measuring AMH in the Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Hang Wun Raymond Li; David Mark Robertson; Chris Burns; William Leigh Ledger
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.