Literature DB >> 21872528

The journey from the old to the new AMH assay: how to avoid getting lost in the values.

S M Nelson1, A La Marca.   

Abstract

Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is set to dominate reproductive endocrinology because of its unique relationship with the ovarian reserve. To date half of the published articles have used the Diagnostic Systems Lab (DSL) assay and the other half the Immunotech (IOT) assay. Unfortunately, these assays utilize two different primary antibodies against AMH and different standards, and consequently the crude values reported can differ substantially, with the IOT assay giving values for AMH that are higher than those obtained with the DSL assay. With the recent consolidation of these two companies by Beckman Coulter, and their sole ownership of the patent to measure mammalian AMH, there is finally a single commercially available assay - the AMH Gen II assay, which will fully replace the DSL and IOT assays. The aim of this article is to briefly focus on the different assays for AMH evaluation in order to give readers hopefully helpful suggestions for a correct interpretation of the AMH measurement. A brief overview on the development and performance characteristics of the new assay, how it relates to previous values and previously developed nomograms and where the future lies for AMH is also provided.
Copyright © 2011 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21872528     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  41 in total

1.  Anti-Müllerian hormone: a potential new tool in epidemiologic studies of female fecundability.

Authors:  Donna D Baird; Anne Z Steiner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  The original Beckman Coulter Generation II assay significantly underestimates AMH levels compared with the revised protocol.

Authors:  Michael Bonifacio; Cara K Bradley; Sonal Karia; Mark Livingstone; Mark C Bowman; Steven J McArthur
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The role of serum AMH and FF AMH in predicting pregnancy outcome in the fresh cycle of IVF/ICSI: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingnv Yao; Wei Zhang; Hong Li; Wenqin Lin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

4.  Ovarian biomarkers predict controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilisation treatment in Singapore.

Authors:  Ryan Wai Kheong Lee; Lay Wai Khin; Marianne Sybille Hendricks; Heng Hao Tan; Sadhana Nadarajah; Nancy Wen Sim Tee; Seong-Feei Loh; Bee Choo Tai; Jerry Ky Chan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Post-chemotherapy serum anti-müllerian hormone level predicts ovarian function recovery.

Authors:  Hyun-Ah Kim; Jihye Choi; Chan Sub Park; Min-Ki Seong; Sungeun Hong; Jae-Sung Kim; In-Chul Park; Jin Kyung Lee; Woo Chul Noh
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.335

6.  AMH in women with diminished ovarian reserve: potential differences by FMR1 CGG repeat level.

Authors:  Lisa M Pastore; Timothy L McMurry; Christopher D Williams; Valerie L Baker; Steven L Young
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Anti-Müllerian hormone as a marker of ovarian reserve: What have we learned, and what should we know?

Authors:  Akira Iwase; Tomoko Nakamura; Satoko Osuka; Sachiko Takikawa; Maki Goto; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-23

8.  Impact of breast cancer on anti-mullerian hormone levels in young women.

Authors:  H I Su; S W Flatt; L Natarajan; A DeMichele; A Z Steiner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Disruptions in ovarian function are related to depression and cardiometabolic risk during premenopause.

Authors:  Maria E Bleil; Joyce T Bromberger; Melissa D Latham; Nancy E Adler; Lauri A Pasch; Steven E Gregorich; Mitchell P Rosen; Marcelle I Cedars
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Does accelerated reproductive aging underlie premenopausal risk for cardiovascular disease?

Authors:  Maria E Bleil; Steven E Gregorich; Daniel McConnell; Mitchell P Rosen; Marcelle I Cedars
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.