Literature DB >> 23114845

Heading off with the herd: how cancer cells might maneuver supernumerary centrosomes for directional migration.

Angela Ogden1, Padmashree C G Rida, Ritu Aneja.   

Abstract

The complicity of centrosomes in carcinogenesis is unmistakable. Mounting evidence clearly implicates a robust correlation between centrosome amplification (CA) and malignant transformation in diverse tissue types. Furthermore, CA has been suggested as a marker of cancer aggressiveness, in particular the invasive phenotype, in breast and prostate cancers. One means by which CA promotes malignancy is through induction of transient spindle multipolarity during mitosis, which predisposes the cell to karyotypic changes arising from low-grade chromosome mis-segregation. It is well recognized that during cell migration in interphase, centrosome-mediated nucleation of a radial microtubule array is crucial for establishing a polarized Golgi apparatus, without which directionality is precluded. The question of how cancer cells maneuver their supernumerary centrosomes to achieve directionality during cell migration is virtually uncharted territory. Given that CA is a hallmark of cancers and has been correlated with cancer aggressiveness, malignant cells are presumably competent in managing their centrosome surfeit during directional migration, although the cellular logistics of this process remain unexplored. Another key angle worth pondering is whether an overabundance of centrosomes confers some advantage on cancer cells in terms of their migratory and invasive capabilities. Recent studies have uncovered a remarkable strategy that cancer cells employ to deal with the problem of excess centrosomes and ensure bipolar mitoses, viz., centrosome clustering. This review aims to change the narrative by exploring how an increased centrosome complement may, via aneuploidy-independent modulation of the microtubule cytoskeleton, enhance directional migration and invasion of malignant cells. We postulate that CA imbues cancer cells with cytoskeletal advantages that enhance cell polarization, Golgi-dependent vesicular trafficking, stromal invasion, and other aspects of metastatic progression. We also propose that centrosome declustering may represent a novel, cancer cell-specific antimetastatic strategy, as cancer cells may rely on centrosome clustering during migration as they do in mitosis. Elucidation of these details offers an exciting avenue for future research, as does investigating how CA may promote metastasis through enhanced directional migration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23114845      PMCID: PMC3581755          DOI: 10.1007/s10555-012-9413-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev        ISSN: 0167-7659            Impact factor:   9.264


  121 in total

Review 1.  Actin machinery: pushing the envelope.

Authors:  G G Borisy; T M Svitkina
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 2.  Let's huddle to prevent a muddle: centrosome declustering as an attractive anticancer strategy.

Authors:  A Ogden; P C G Rida; R Aneja
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  Altered centrosome structure is associated with abnormal mitoses in human breast tumors.

Authors:  W L Lingle; J L Salisbury
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Interaction and feedback regulation between STK15/BTAK/Aurora-A kinase and protein phosphatase 1 through mitotic cell division cycle.

Authors:  H Katayama; H Zhou; Q Li; M Tatsuka; S Sen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Tumor hypoxia: definitions and current clinical, biologic, and molecular aspects.

Authors:  M Höckel; P Vaupel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-02-21       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  EB1-recruited microtubule +TIP complexes coordinate protrusion dynamics during 3D epithelial remodeling.

Authors:  Sarah Gierke; Torsten Wittmann
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Centrosome defects can account for cellular and genetic changes that characterize prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  G A Pihan; A Purohit; J Wallace; R Malhotra; L Liotta; S J Doxsey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Cell motility: can Rho GTPases and microtubules point the way?

Authors:  T Wittmann; C M Waterman-Storer
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Focal adhesion features during myofibroblastic differentiation are controlled by intracellular and extracellular factors.

Authors:  V Dugina; L Fontao; C Chaponnier; J Vasiliev; G Gabbiani
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Cytoskeletal control of fibroblast length: experiments with linear strips of substrate.

Authors:  E M Levina; M A Kharitonova; Y A Rovensky; J M Vasiliev
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  How to be good at being bad: centrosome amplification and mitotic propensity drive intratumoral heterogeneity.

Authors:  Padmashree C G Rida; Guilherme Cantuaria; Michelle D Reid; Omer Kucuk; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.264

2.  The WASF3-NCKAP1-CYFIP1 Complex Is Essential for Breast Cancer Metastasis.

Authors:  Yong Teng; Haiyan Qin; Abdulaziz Bahassan; N George Bendzunas; Eileen J Kennedy; John K Cowell
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Interphase microtubules: chief casualties in the war on cancer?

Authors:  Angela Ogden; Padmashree C G Rida; Michelle D Reid; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 7.851

4.  A Quantitative Centrosomal Amplification Score Predicts Local Recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Michael S Toss; Guanhao Wei; Jaspreet Kaur; Karuna Mittal; Da Hoon Choi; Brian D Melton; Remus M Osan; Islam M Miligy; Andrew R Green; Emiel A M Janssen; Håvard Søiland; Keerthi Gogineni; Upender Manne; Padmashree Rida; Emad A Rakha; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Aberrant Immunophenotypic Expression of CD5 in a Case of B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Case Report.

Authors:  Deepti Mutreja; Hara Prasad Pati; Divya Bansal; Rahul Kumar Sharma; Sonal Jain
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 0.900

6.  Mitochondrial genome regulates mitotic fidelity by maintaining centrosomal homeostasis.

Authors:  Shashikiran Donthamsetty; Meera Brahmbhatt; Vaishali Pannu; Padmashree C G Rida; Sujatha Ramarathinam; Angela Ogden; Alice Cheng; Keshav K Singh; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 7.  Turning the headlights on novel cancer biomarkers: Inspection of mechanics underlying intratumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  Michelle McBride; Padmashree C G Rida; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2015-05-27

Review 8.  Centrosome amplification: a suspect in breast cancer and racial disparities.

Authors:  Angela Ogden; Padmashree C G Rida; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.678

9.  CDK1 phosphorylation of YAP promotes mitotic defects and cell motility and is essential for neoplastic transformation.

Authors:  Shuping Yang; Lin Zhang; Miao Liu; Rong Chong; Shi-Jian Ding; Yuanhong Chen; Jixin Dong
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Circulating Tumor Cell and Cell-free Circulating Tumor DNA in Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Fariz Nurwidya; Jamal Zaini; Andika Chandra Putra; Sita Andarini; Achmad Hudoyo; Elisna Syahruddin; Faisal Yunus
Journal:  Chonnam Med J       Date:  2016-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.