Literature DB >> 26107160

Valence and agency influence striatal response to feedback in patients with major depressive disorder.

Jakub Späti1, Justin Chumbley1, Nadja Doerig1, Janis Brakowski1, Martin Grosse Holtforth1, Erich Seifritz1, Simona Spinelli1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reduced sensitivity to positive feedback is common in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). However, findings regarding negative feedback are ambiguous, with both exaggerated and blunted responses being reported. The ventral striatum (VS) plays a major role in processing valenced feedback, and previous imaging studies have shown that the locus of controls (self agency v. external agency) over the outcome influences VS response to feedback. We investigated whether attributing the outcome to one's own action or to an external agent influences feedback processing in patients with MDD. We hypothesized that depressed participants would be less sensitive to the feedback attribution reflected by an altered VS response to self-attributed gains and losses.
METHODS: Using functional MRI and a motion prediction task, we investigated the neural responses to self-attributed (SA) and externally attributed (EA) monetary gains and losses in unmedicated patients with MDD and healthy controls.
RESULTS: We included 21 patients and 25 controls in our study. Consistent with our prediction, healthy controls showed a VS response influenced by feedback valence and attribution, whereas in depressed patients striatal activity was modulated by valence but was insensitive to attribution. This attribution insensitivity led to an altered ventral putamen response for SA - EA losses in patients with MDD compared with healthy controls. LIMITATIONS: Depressed patients with comorbid anxiety disorder were included.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest an altered assignment of motivational salience to SA losses in patients with MDD. Altered striatal response to SA negative events may reinforce the belief of not being in control of negative outcomes contributing to a cycle of learned helplessness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26107160      PMCID: PMC4622637          DOI: 10.1503/jpn.140225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci        ISSN: 1180-4882            Impact factor:   6.186


  57 in total

1.  Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRI.

Authors:  B Knutson; G W Fong; C M Adams; J L Varner; D Hommer
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Ventral striatum response during reward and punishment reversal learning in unmedicated major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Oliver J Robinson; Roshan Cools; Christina O Carlisi; Barbara J Sahakian; Wayne C Drevets
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation.

Authors:  L Y Abramson; M E Seligman; J D Teasdale
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1978-02

4.  Effects of task-relevant incentives on the electrophysiological correlates of error processing in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Avram J Holmes; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Striatal responses to negative monetary outcomes differ between temperamentally inhibited and non-inhibited adolescents.

Authors:  Sarah M Helfinstein; Brenda Benson; Koraly Perez-Edgar; Yair Bar-Haim; Allison Detloff; Daniel S Pine; Nathan A Fox; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Meta-analysis of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism in anxiety disorders and anxiety-related personality traits.

Authors:  Alessandra Frustaci; Gino Pozzi; Francesco Gianfagna; Lamberto Manzoli; Stefania Boccia
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 2.328

7.  [German version of the Snaith-Hamilton-Pleasure Scale (SHAPS-D). Anhedonia in schizophrenic and depressive patients].

Authors:  M Franz; M R Lemke; T Meyer; J Ulferts; P Puhl; R P Snaith
Journal:  Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 0.752

8.  Reduced hedonic capacity in major depressive disorder: evidence from a probabilistic reward task.

Authors:  Diego A Pizzagalli; Dan Iosifescu; Lindsay A Hallett; Kyle G Ratner; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 4.791

9.  Blunted response to feedback information in depressive illness.

Authors:  J D Steele; P Kumar; K P Ebmeier
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-06-24       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  What are the Odds? The Neural Correlates of Active Choice during Gambling.

Authors:  Bettina Studer; Annemieke M Apergis-Schoute; Trevor W Robbins; Luke Clark
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Prefrontal cortex and depression.

Authors:  Diego A Pizzagalli; Angela C Roberts
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Causal Inference Gates Corticostriatal Learning.

Authors:  Hayley M Dorfman; Momchil S Tomov; Bernice Cheung; Dennis Clarke; Samuel J Gershman; Brent L Hughes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Explicit Agency in Patients with Cervical Dystonia: Altered Recognition of Temporal Discrepancies between Motor Actions and Their Feedback.

Authors:  Cécile Delorme; Emmanuel Roze; David Grabli; Jean-Michel Mayer; Bertrand Degos; Marie Vidailhet; Yulia Worbe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.