| Literature DB >> 23110072 |
Pernille Sarup1, Simon Metz Mariendal Pedersen, Niels Chr Nielsen, Anders Malmendal, Volker Loeschcke.
Abstract
We investigated the age-related changes in the metabolic profile of male Drosophila melanogaster and compared the metabolic profile of flies selected for increased longevity to that of control flies of equal age. We found clear differences in metabolite composition between selection regimes and among age groups. Contrary to results found in a previous study of the transcriptome of these lines the metabolic profile did not show a younger pattern in longevity-selected (LS) flies than in same aged control (C) flies. Rather, many of the metabolites affected by age had levels common to older control individuals in the young LS flies. Furthermore, ageing affected the metabolome in a different LS specific direction. The selection induced difference increased with age. Some metabolites involved in oxidative phosphorylation changed with age highlighting the importance of mitochondrial function in the ageing process. However, these metabolites were not affected by selection for increased longevity, indicating that improvements of mitochondrial function were not involved in the increased lifespan of LS lines. Of the eight metabolites identified as having a significant difference in relative abundance between selection regimes in our study choline, lysine and glucose also show difference among lifespan phenotypes in C. elegans indicating that the correlation between the concentration of these metabolites and longevity was evolutionary conserved. Links between longevity and choline concentration is also found in mice making this metabolite an obvious target for further study.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23110072 PMCID: PMC3479100 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 11H NMR spectrum of Drosophila melanogaster metabolites.
CPMG spectrum of 3-day-old control flies acquired at 25°C and pH 7.4. Well-resolved signals are assigned. The scale in the insert is five times larger than in the full spectrum.
Figure 2PCA scores for PC1 and PC2.
PCA scores for PC1 and PC2 for C lines (open symbols) and LS lines (closed symbols) at day 3, day 19, and for LS lines day 35 with (A) showing selection regimes and (B) individual lines. The difference between old (day 19 and 35) and young (day 3) flies in the metabolome of selection regimes and individual lines are shown in (C) and (D), respectively. PC1 and PC2 explain 37 and 12% of the variation in (A) and (B), and 18 and 13% in (C) and (D). Error bars represent one standard error.
Figure 3Hierarchical cluster analysis of the metabolic profiles.
Hierarchical cluster analysis of the metabolic profiles of C and LS lines at day 3, day 19 and for LS lines at day 35 with (A) showing selection regimes and (B) showing individual lines. of the difference between old (day 19 and 35) and young (day 3) flies in the metabolome of selection regimes (C) and individual lines (D).
Two-way MANOVA of PCA scores based on signal intensities or changesa in signal intensity.
| Analysis | P (selection) | P (age) | P (interaction) |
| Intensities | 6×10−26*** | 5×10−35*** | 0.2 |
| Intensity changes | 2×10−15*** | 1×10−38*** | n/a |
Significance (P = 0.05, 0.01, 0.001).
relative to young (day 3) flies.
Summary of OPLS-DA and OPLS models.
| Comparison/Characteristic |
|
| R2X | Q2
|
| LS-3– C-3 | 1+5 | 29 | 0.61 | 0.93 |
| C-19– C-3 | 1+5 | 29 | 0.60 | 0.96 |
| LS-19– LS-3 | 1+6 | 29 | 0.68 | 0.95 |
| LS-35– LS-19 | 1+6 | 29 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| LS-age interaction | 1+5 | 140 | 0.53 | 0.86 |
| Age | 1+4 | 72 | 0.47 | 0.95 |
| Life expectancy | 1+7 | 72 | 0.64 | 0.77 |
| Death rate | 1+7 | 72 | 0.63 | 0.60 |
R 2 X describes how much of the total variation is explained by the model.
Q 2 represents the predictability of the total model and is related to the statistical validity of the model. OPLS-DA showing Q2 values >0.5 is considered significant. Q was calculated using cross-validation with all measurements for one line at one age left out one at a time.
A describes the number of model components.
n describes the number of observation in the model.
Based on differences between 3 and 19 day old flies.
Metabolite changes/differences with time and/or selection regime or viability characteristics as determined by OPLS-DA or OPLS.
| Metabolite | 1H chemical shifts (ppm) | LS-3 C-3 | C19 C-3 | LS-19 LS-3 | LS-35 LS-19 | LS-3->LS-19C-3->C-19 | Age | Life expectancy | Death rate |
| AMP | 8.6, 6.13, 4.35 |
|
|
| |||||
| 3-hydroxykynurenine | 7.44, 6.98, 6.69,4.13, 3.18 |
|
| ||||||
| Maltose | 5.4, 5.21, 4.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Glucose | 5.21, 4.64 |
|
|
| |||||
| 1-O-(4-O-(2-aminoethyl phosphate)-β- | 4.48, 4.18, 3.93, 3.78, 3.26 |
|
|
|
| ||||
| Choline | 3.18 |
|
|
|
|
| |||
| β-alanine | 3.17, 2.54 |
|
| ||||||
| Lysine | 3.00, 1.90, 1.70 |
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Glutamine | 2.42, 2.12 |
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Alanine | 1.45 |
|
| ||||||
| Lactate/Threonine | 1.30 |
|
| ||||||
| Fatty acid | 0.91, 0.88 |
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Unidentified metabolite | 3.03, 2.74, 2.31, 1.90 |
|
|
|
|
- indicates a lower level in the upper category, or a decrease with increasing value of the life history parameter, while + indicates a higher level in the upper category, or an increase with increasing value of the life history parameter.
the difference was only significant after removing the orthogonal variation explained by the model.
Results from two-way ANOVA analysis of eigenmetabolites. The number in parenthesis denotes the number of bins per module.
| source | DF | MS | F | P | |
| Module 1 | Selection | 1 | 0.0434 | 4.2187 | 0.04383 |
| (64) | Age | 1 | 0.214378 | 20.8386 | 2.16E-05 |
| Sel x Age | 1 | 0.042667 | 4.1474 | 0.0456 | |
| Error | 68 | 0.010288 | |||
| Module 2 | Selection | 1 | 0.34422 | 53.0789 | 4.33E-10 |
| (332) | Age | 1 | 0.21334 | 32.8978 | 2.45E-07 |
| Sel x Age | 1 | 0.00146 | 0.2247 | 0.637 | |
| Error | 68 | 0.00871 | |||
| Module 3 | Selection | 1 | 0.33663 | 38.6531 | 3.54E-08 |
| (142) | Age | 1 | 0.01567 | 1.7997 | 0.18421 |
| Sel x Age | 1 | 0.05548 | 6.3707 | 0.01394 | |
| Error | 68 | 0.59221 | |||
| Module 4 | Selection | 1 | 0.039825 | 2.9007 | 0.0931 |
| (52) | Age | 1 | 0.025237 | 1.8381 | 0.1797 |
| Sel x Age | 1 | 0.001318 | 0.096 | 0.7576 | |
| Error | 68 | 0.01373 | |||
| Bins that does not belong to any module | Selection | 1 | 0.034302 | 2.9799 | 0.0888465 |
| (66) | Age | 1 | 0.180576 | 15.6869 | 0.0001815 |
| Sel x Age | 1 | 0.002357 | 0.2048 | 0.6523374 | |
| Error | 68 | 0.011511 |
degrees of freedom.
mean squares.
Results from one-way ANOVA analysis of dry weight and relative fat content of males, with line nested within selection regime.
| Source | DF | F Ratio | p | |
| Dry weight | selection | 1 | 10.44 | 0.03 |
| Relative nitrogen content | selection | 1 | 12.09 | 0.02 |
| Relative carbon content | selection | 1 | 7.24 | 0.05 |
| Relative fat content | selection | 1 | 1.09 | 0.36 |
degrees of freedom.
Figure 4Body composition.
Dry weight in 100 mg, relative nitrogen, carbon, and fat content (% of dry weight) in LS and C lines with standard deviations.